Bigbrog

Because of a tweet?? Again...come on man...seriously. What you are saying and the mainstream media is nothing but rhetoric that has no basis in facts or reality...just your reality you want it to be. I would be the first to stand up and criticize this administration if I thought they weren't adhering to something that the SCOTUS ruled on but this is nowhere near that...this is a bunch of people who hate Trump trying their hardest to turn every little thing into some HUGE travesty...luckily most of the US isn't buying it.

What did the Supreme Court say that Trump's administration isn't complying with??

How in the heck did you get a picture of me???

So, we get to pick and choose what we considered accusations and what we don't? Also, how are people crucifying Garcia...because they support him being deported?? As Scout said...you come here illegally you get deported...hard stop. Majority of Americans support that...hard stop. People elected Trump to do exactly what he is doing...hard stop. I've said this on other posts...at least be genuine and just say you hate everything Trump does versus trying to play mental gymnastics in your head to somehow paint his policies to be something other than they are, or somehow make it sound like the things he does are such a travesty. I am not a fan of everything Trump does, or who he is as a person, heck I didn't even vote for him, this time, but I do like some of his policies...including his boarder and deportation policies. You don't want to get deported, or want "due process", don't freaking come here illegally...period. I just can't understand the selective outrage for this one person who has plenty of "smoke" around him that shows he is a bad dude...AND he came here illegally...again just say you are playing politics and are trying to create rhetoric because you hate Trump. And by the way, no matter all the selective outrage and pearl clutching that is happening, Garcia isn't coming back...as he shouldn't.

Seriously?!?! Come on...what a disingenuous statement and quite frankly ridiculous. And I am not even a Hegseth fan as I thought he was a bad choice to begin with...mostly for some of his views and how he presented himself...but to compare him to a person who was here illegally, accused of human trafficking, being a gang member (one of the worst gangs out there), beating his wife, etc.?? SMH

Loved looking at my 401k this morning...still up over 5% since beginning of the year.

Come on...don't be obtuse...just because they FINALLY got labeled a terrorist organization doesn't mean they weren't terrorizing us before. I just don't get the endless support for violent gang members that if they met you wouldn't care less if you supported them or not, they'd more than likely rob you, or worse, without blinking an eye. Yet you try and normalize them and their behavior by your rhetoric...why do you do that...seriously?? Is it because it is the "in thing to do" for D's?? So ridiculous.

I agree...regardless of the letter after your name people should be held accountable for their actions...I'll wait for you to hold this same standard to a D...and there have been plenty of times a D has done similar things with their electronic devices and you and your ilk were silent or defended the person.

Coocoo....Coocoo....

I love at the end..."I am a dancing clown!"

So I'm confused, what in the heck are you even arguing about...you said the SCOTUS said we had to return him, which you then say it isn't what the SCOTUS said, they you said we should ask to have him returned, but we did provide a plane, and then you said we didn't ask. Then you said Bukele should send him back because the District Court said Trump should send him back, but then you said no Bukele doesn't have to send him back, but should send him back if Trump asks...again even though we sent a plane. Then you backtrack even more and say, "Well Bukele shouldn't have said to smuggle him into the US because it wouldn't be smuggling....so AGAIN, what is your stance....should we or shouldn't we get the gang member back? Or is it you just want to complain about every little thing Trump does no matter what??

Trump doesn't want him back!! What does that have to do with being a deal maker?? Sorry bud, but you are reaching so hard on this and are wrong at every turn.

LOL...SCOTUS is requiring the US to TRY and facilitate HIS RELEASE from prison....and you finally admit the SCOTUS doesn't say we have to return him. And now you are holding Bukele to abide by the US district courts?? The SCOTUS specifically says that the District Court has no standing to have any say in foreign affairs. And what do you disagree with about what Bukele said?

impeach Trump because he didn't ask nicely

I'm not sure how hard it is to understand that while someone can most certainly go around saying they support terrorists (without materially providing support) as it is protected by the first amendment; however, you can't block access to people from going places, you can't vandalize property, you can't take over buildings, you can't set up encampments on campus, and you also are held to a certain behavioral expectation especially when on a private college campus. I bet if RV spewed his rhetoric at his job he would be fired on the spot. As for government support for colleges, I am fine with whatever the past/current/future President/Congress finds acceptable to give grants to as long as it is based on merit and the purpose is to better the students and the country...and am fine if they choose to no longer give grants. Just like elections have consequences, behavior has consequences, including college administrations behavior.

How hard is it to understand what "help facilitate the release from prison" means. You keep spewing the left's MSM's rhetoric and it isn't true. If the SCOTUS wanted the US to "facilitate his return to the US" they would have said that they uphold the district court's ruling, but they didn't. Funny part is what you posted says exactly what I am saying but you refuse to read it that way. Let's start here...how do you interpret this to mean (from what you posted)..."The intended scope of the term "effectuate" in the District Court's order is, however, unclear and may exceed the District Court's authority." It even goes on to say that the government should be prepared to share WHAT IT CAN concerning the steps it has taken.... Again, tell us what you think that means....

Care to again say what the Supreme Court ruling said?? I bet it doesn't say what you think it says.

But I have a kid

So your opinion is the only one that isn't "cute" and you have ALL the evidence and can ascertain it to be "flimsy"??? Come on man...at least be intellectually honest and just say "Based on only the sources I choose to read and what their headlines say, it seems to be that there isn't much evidence to the claims he is an MS13 gang member, I mean he said he isn't one, that he didn't come here illegally, never beat his wife, and he feared for his life even though he didn't state that when he first came to the country illegally."

I don't care if you have proof from multiple sources, I said I wasn't so I wasn't...

Nothing to do with all the religious stuff, but Amit Elor is my current favorite American wrestler...she is amazing!

I wasn't speeding today on my way to work

Are you going to admit you were wrong again....we'll wait.....

Do you ever get sick of being wrong?? And have you ever in your life been like..."yeah, I guess I was wrong on that"...my guess is no. You remind me of the young relative that is overly opinionated (and wrong) on everything that no one wants to invite to Easter dinner.

I sure hope you are referring to Kentucky??