scourge165

Yeah... I tore mine up and I got back to being pretty good, pretty strong. Rehabbed it, I was never a guy who could throw up 400 pounds or 360...but I could throw up 225 15-20X or more if I was training hard and training for endurance. But I my shoulder looked all jacked when I would raise my arm over my head. It poked out and made a weird song. That was the end for me. They drilled 4 holes for anchors, and basically just tied it back together. I was no longer Wrestling and I'm pretty sure the reference was a hack doctor. I got back to being able to lift, but I can't throw anymore(and I used to love Baseball). But those shoulder injuries were SOO painful. I've had hip, knee, back(that was actually minor, but it was spne)...I've had over 15 now. Nothing hurt like that shoulder when the nerve blocker wore off.

LOL... because you can't without making a fool of yourself. By the way, my Norton blocks the Tweets you send... but shockingly, you're once again leaning on someone else to articulate a point for you. That's funny, they're PERFECTLY valid sources for ME. YOU all were the ones claiming Iran "wasn't serious" and that Iran wasnt' following the agreement in 2018 when Trump pulled out...despite those same sources saying otherwise.

Jesus Christ dude, this was a simple question asking where they were seeing that. I wasn't near a TV and had a poor connection. (Then again, you still never answered why you believe the IAEA NOW when you blindly dismissed them in 2018.... and just to remind you of your buffoonery when you ask why I believe THEM in 2018, but NOT today, I'll... just reiterate, I've believed them both times as I have no reason not to). He promises everything on most issue, so it's hard to do the opposite of what he promised to do. That said, I'm REALLY on board with this one is if they support Reza Pahlavi in helping him with regime change(which Iranians are overwhelmingly in favor of, with 40% specifically wanting HIM to lead them and ~80% who want a form of a Democracy.

A coherent policy regarding Iran? This administration is all over the place. -2018, their State Department says they're abiding by the JPCOA -The IAEA said they've been in full compliance and. **US Pulls out of Deal...which means Iran has no reason to adhere to the plan after we unfroze their money(we never "gave" them money, we had their money frozen and released it) -2nd Administration says; And now aside from Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Palestine, all of which the US were merely involved in tangentially, they're not directly involved. Which in Iran's case, I'm fine...IF they were going to support the Shah and the Shah's supporters. But they're not, this is it...they're done. So the last administration didn't actually get involved in a War, this one did(in fact the last one LEFT a War).

Where are these reports from?

Fair enough... I do get suckered into these...weird changes midway through that are not related to the original topic. But I agree with that article on that count. I celebrated Bush and Bowman getting knocked out, I'd like to see Pesseley, Talib and...another who's name escapes me. Beshear, Polis(if he was straight, I think he'd be great, I think that'll take away from it), JB from Illinois, Mark Kelly is a guy I think would have impacted the election...though he's a "loon," yet I haven't heard why. We get distracted by these... silly peripheral issues that serve almost nobody. They'll call a guy like Biden a Marxist anyway, but that's to be expected under any circumstance. I do think it's funny who the right view as the leaders on the left. Someone named Jeffries, Harris(Obviously not)...Newsom(very popular) and AOC...who is not the Cori Bush type progressive they suggest and she may be "a leader," more recently, but not a candidate for POTUS anytime soon.

No... not now. 15 years ago...yes. Of course. He Wrestle's real Wrestlers and then it's a joke. He Wrestled Josh Moore, former Penn State and current Kent State coach...and it was just play Wrestling. Moore could have taken him down over and over. But it's a good video for the sport, so lets keep the secret for a while!

So...SOOO many young kids with cars dude! And you must not be a CFB fan if you never heard about him before that? He was a great College QB and my prediction is... as always entirely dependent upon what the Browns surrounding talent looks like. If he was in the right situation, I'd say he could be a PB caliber QB. He's in the 2nd worst organization when it comes to developing QBs since the Sid Luckman, Otto Graham era. Only the Bears have been worse...and their QB(who similarly had the same type of stupid speeding tickets) appears to be the guy who'll finally break their curse(which sucks, I enjoy the pitiful Bears).

No, it's not a mandatory court appearance. You just basically admit guilt by not going and lose whatever points were associated with the tickets. The speeding ticket is...not a big deal. It was his attitude, telling front offices how he's turn around their franchise. He should have been a late 1st, but...he was obnoxious. He could be a really good player though. VERY accurate passer and great anticipation. Just needs to realize he hasn't done what his Dad did. He did have an incredible College career, but he isn't a great athlete and doesn't have great arm strength relative to other top QBs. But he is very smart... reading the defense and playing the game.

It's also the main source of Jimmy...err...Scout(same person) and the basis for every argument. Please nobody show them Facebook where they use just...completely AI generated articles to come up with ridiculous stories.

So... yet again @Scouts Honor is incapable of articulating why he agrees with the 2025 IAEA report, but claims he knows for sure the IAEA was lying in 2018(Along with the US State Department). That's about a page now and he can't answer a simple question. Not that it's a big deal, it's SUPER obvious why he can't. one fits his talking points and the other doesn't. And as always, I'm neve sure why people screen show an article rather than just posting it here. -It's almost like they don't actually read the articles and prefer to remain ignorant; https://taskandpurpose.com/news/iran-attacks-us-military-iraq-syria-biden/?utm_source=chatgpt.com It also says; Not sure this is a compelling argument that this is "our war," and we've attacked those same groups many more times then they've attacked us.... or why don't we go after Jordan ore the places these Iranian backed groups actually live? -Either way, don't be a coward Scout, answer the question or just say you're a hypocrite. -Also, the screenshot with no link so you can only see the headline with no context is quintessential Scout/Jimmy stuff.

Kinda, but we're talking about fundraising, you're talking about a more specific issue. It basically comes down to David Hogg and his position/approach to spending the money on putting up primary contenders to the GOP(similar to '18 when the GOP red wave never came as they tried to run more extremist candidates). It's a bad strategy that... doesn't really belong in the DNC. Let the special interest groups spend money primarying one side or the other. But over all this...consternation from the right over how much troulble the Democrats are having a year and a half before...they still raised more than the Republicans with the top donors wanting to see the direction before they spend any money. Mostly a nothing story and...again, there have been a dozen saying the Republican fundraising was dead. It's kinda funny how people suddenly care about these things June a year before MID-terms.

No, you're just posting articles that you can't read or summarize because you saw a headline, but you can't even read the article. That's...the definition of being a clown bro. They're...literally out-raising Republicans(as I showed you without editorializing it). C'mon dude, that Jimmy/Scout stuff.

I don't really think it's fair to call this a 'beg-a-thon.' I've seen someone opened a fundraiser to help them grow an RTC for higher level athletes to train in Wisconsin...which makes sense given they'll have guys like O'Toole, Mesenbrink, and then perhaps Hopke, Sinclair...a ton of guys who COULD be competitive in the coming years., Millard, Scholes, Clark. Either way, just an idea someone else came up with. And then I'd guess there's a Gofundme for Amy as she's got 3 young kids, but Dana White can't just write a check and cover these transplants. if that was the case, I'd think Ben would be fine as he's done very well financially.

By the time he's ready to go to College, Bassett may have transferred, but my guess would be Iowa, Penn State, Okie State and long shot, OSU, Cornell...

How did Bassett become such an old Jr? And that's SO pathetic. An 8th grade kid...so you're ~13 when you make the decision(so it's NOT your decision) and you're "morally bankrupt?" You hurt a kid, you're morally bankrupt, you scam people, you steal money, you're morally bankrupt. You are a small 8th grader and you re-do 8th grade PURELY for athletic reason and it sure as hell does NOT mean you're "morally bankrupt."

Yeah, I remembered it shortly after posting this. He was a stud. He was undefeated at Minesota... albeit in limited matches, but...~14-0 in opens and not struggling as a RS Freshmen.

And ONCE AGAIN... to show the difference between me and Scout(and since Scout apparently hasn't picked up on this) but I've never questioned the current report. I absolutely said...from the start of this thread, once we pulled out, they've been working toward a bomb. Scout is the one who believes the IAEA in one case, but not in the other.

You didn't and you will never answer my question. MY question was so extremely simple, but in order to answer it, you'd have to admit you're a liar. Why do you NOT believe the 2018 report that Iran was abiding by the agreement, but then turn around and use that very same source to say they're at 60% enrichment(and they need to get to 90%...and they also need a delivery system, but I understand you only understand what's on Twitter. (And don't worry, I know there is zero chance you'll justify believing the IAEA AND the US Sec of State in 2018, but you believe the IAEA now).

Cool Ok, buddy, so where are you getting 60% from? The IAEA? And AGAIN, I didn't. I believe the one now. YOU'RE calling the the report from 2018 a lie? Either way, this is how you become a joke. YOU are claiming the VERY SAME SOURCE that said they're at ~60% enriched Uranium is the SAME ORGANIZATION THAT SAID THEY WERE ABIDING BY THE AGREEMENT IN 2018!!! You're just too dumb to see you're making my point for me SOOO easily! You really think Obama just "gave them money," don't you? The agreed to unfreeze Iran's own funds. LOL...riiight. And since you believe it, that means, you only believe a source if it fits what you WANT to believe. You did. You spelled out that you're just...kinda making things up here Scout!

Well, I disagree from my experience. They want the Ayatollah gone and I don't think they care who is helping them. Setting aside all the influencers and taking into account the distrust of doing public survey's in Iran... at the VERY least, there's a WHOLE lot who favor Israel over their own regime... I won't even justify the "endless murders and genocidal actions." It's not worth it to me. People who think the Israeli's are somehow the ones who started this are... not going to change their mind. Whatever...in EVERY world, the BEST potential outcome is Iranians standing up and overthrowing their Govt', they'd almost certainly normalize relations if the Son of the Shah came back as Israel is the Regional power now(they had to be after the ENTIRE region tried coming at them time and time again) and Iran goes back to the modern, progressive, MODERN Nation(relative to the Middle East, just NOT blinding Women for talking back). And then there's another fact that FAR too many people just won't acknowledge. Our culture isn't just different than Iran, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Egypt... it's BETTER. We always want to tip toe around that as though, 'well, that's just their culture.' Ok. Well, Women are supposed to obey Men and you could take the Bible and concoct a real twisted theocratic Christian Nation in the West as though the Handmaid's tale was real, but we moved PAST that. So had Iran until they had their revolution in 1979. On reddit, some Iranians and diaspora voices express warm feelings toward Israel, nostalgic for pre-1979 ties and hopeful for future rapprochement .

The NYTs article is "evidence the DNC is broke," and that's your takeaway? Ok, so you didn't read the article. Got it. They raised more than the GOP in the first quarter. My opinion is this is nothing. They have some infighting as David Hogg wants to primary Democrats to put up the exact type of candidates that lose and that we've been primarying to try and get rid of them(Bush, Bowman...Talib) and the larger donors want to see the outcome. You realize you could go and find a dozen of these articles from... the RNC... And AGAIN, the DNC raised MORE than the RNC in the first quarter. So... first, if you post an article that isn't from a right wing site, make sure you can read it. You obviously couldn't and didn't in the first case. There are...dozens and dozens of articles about donors not wanting to donate to the RNC and the DNC out-raising them. We're not even close to the mid-terms, much less the next Presidential Election and you're worried about the Democrats when the right is normally complaining it's not fair they raise more? LOL....cool. Now, I gotta go take my Nephew on a 4-wheeler ride...I'll be back when you figure out exactly what your point is here.

Hey, I certainly appreciate this "scholarly intellect," you've...rather consistently assigned to me! I'm flattered you'd think so highly of me.

So...what did that article say and what was the point of contention as YOU see it...given I'm sure you're not just going off a headline, right?

Yeah, I never said Harris, Hakm or AOC. Newsom would hardly be "laughable," but not my choice. And if you want to know what someone stands for, go look it up. But calling an Astronaut and literal Fighter Pilot a "loon," is a little silly. He's also one of the most bi-partisan Senators based on his voting history. But sure, "Loon." (Have you seen the cabinet or the guy who sits behind the resolute desk)? You want to know what Polis stands for, go listen to some speeches. JB Pritzker...again, too far, but he looses 40 pounds, he'd be a great candidate.