1032004

Only 1 finalist? No I don’t think that is possible.

I haven’t really heard a Penn State wrestler talk about much of anything except maybe Starocci talking about how great he is

Barnett beat Courtney at MIdlands this year

I'm guessing with Soldano it might be more of don't want the other guy to get a feel for him (still a duck from Goodale though unless he's injured)

Maybe this is just the norm now, but I feel like there were quite a few anticipated matchups that did not happen. I presume some were actual injuries Michigan/Iowa: Ragusin (Teske) Amine (Kennedy) Ragusin wrestled against Indiana, Amine did not. I know back at themat we would not call it an official duck if the wrestler also missed the next match (particularly against an unranked opponent). Northwestern/Purdue: DeAugustino (Ramos) - NW forfeited Tal Shahar (Filius) - NW forfeited Both of them wrestled Friday against Northern Illinois, although DeAugustino actually lost. UNC/VT: Sherman (Henson) - Sherman did not wrestle in last week’s dual either…injury? Lautt (Lewis) Minnesota/Wisconsin: Brayton Lee (Model) Kudos to UNI/Iowa State and Pitt/VT who looked to wrestle their full lineups.

Pyles on FRL one day said Brands alluded to an injury and that he wouldn’t be wrestling this past weekend

So he got 2 medical redshirts in 2018 and 2019? Weirdly wrestlestat only shows 1

Yeah to be clear I’m referring to the 1:47 to 1:10 timeframe. I think most of what follows can be argued as not stalling according to the rulebook, although some refs certainly might’ve hit him for basically walking Hart out of bounds

Did you see the match in question? The link in the OP didn’t work for me but it starts at 9:45 of this one: That’s stalling even by the rulebook definition.

The most common example I can think of is if someone is in on a double (could also get to that position from a mat return) and then locks around the body to take them to their back. I’ve never seen that called locked hands even if locked prior to meeting nearfall criteria (and after the TD was awarded if from neutral)

I thought it just had to be a pinning situation or something, not necessarily meeting NF criteria, but could be wrong

Hofstra head coach:

Just saw Willie asked the same question. Apparently neutral danger takedown is past 90, didn’t realize that

I don’t think anyone said he actually was, just that they think he should have been?

It’s Bormet, not the wrestlers, clearly

I don’t see how he didn’t get nearfall if he got the danger takedown, seemed like Parris didn’t really move. Is danger a different angle required?

Is this that politician guy from Kansas or something that would post random stuff on themat?

Although… Coaches rank has Courtney tied for 7, so keeping Lee at 1 keeps him on the opposite side. There’s probably a decent chance Courtney ends up at 6 or 7. He likely isn’t passing Lee, Barnett (lost H2H), Glory or Cardinale. 1 or 2 other B10 guys probably stay ahead of him, but he could jump the rest. Probably thinking way too much into this lol…

I saw that. And Zeke had a vote for 125 too… Which is another a stupid thing about this process…each conference gets 2 votes for every weight, regardless of the size of the conference. So Zeke gets 4 votes but Cael only gets 2.

Hmm, probably true

It was brought up on FRL that RBY, Yianni and Kerk were not included in the first coaches rankings due to not enough matches so people (Zeke Jones it seems) may have just copied those ones exactly. Which I guess is possible

Don’t they say that’s just a ranking too?

Yeah I think you solved the mystery. I was going to say how would his guy benefit, but all 3 of McGee, Parco and Schultz are currently at either 4 or 5 so the clear #1 has in theory dropped to the opposite side of the bracket (at least at 133 and 149, forgot Kerk lost). But still seems stupid though, surely the other criteria would push RBY in particular back to the #1 actual seed right?

I think that was a photoshopped picture of DeSanto or something

Where is the list of coaches that vote for each weight?