Jump to content

mspart

Members
  • Posts

    4,027
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by mspart

  1. I thought schools were gun free zones. But apparently nothing happened here other than the parents were not advised. Super needed to go. You don't do that. Period. It is not a cell phone etc as noted above. But you can kill with a cell phone if you try hard enough. Good thing that kid didn't pull the trigger. He'd be deaf in that bathroom if not seriously injured. I'd say that kid has had a decent edumacation about common sense. There's not much of that around anymore. mspart
  2. Hey Luchador, better pic!! mspart
  3. That was incredible mat awareness from Lee. Very impressive. mspart
  4. I know that WA has girls State. But during the normal season, the girls wrestle boys or don't wrestle. There are only a few teams that have a full girls team. I know at the HS that I volunteered at, we had a few girls the last few years but it was less than a couple each year. mspart
  5. Saitiev was OLY gold from 1996 through 2008. He did not medal in 2000 as we all know. He won 6 WCs. His last WC was 2005 and he came back for 2008 to win gold. He is the best there was. His brother Adam was also very good but had the misfortune to be younger than Bouvi. But he won 2 WC and 1 OLY gold. Sadulaev has 5 WC and 2 OLY golds. So he is close to Saitiev. But I think Bouvaisar was a better freestyler. He is hands down considered the best there's ever been. mspart
  6. Well, we may not have the fittest in the navy but........ mspart
  7. UW does not have wrestling. mspart
  8. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/3857172-five-lingering-questions-over-ohio-train-derailment-toxic-spill/ Did lax regulations help cause the crash? Railroad safety experts and union members have reiterated calls for more stringent federal oversight of the rail industry following the derailment. One area of constant tension has been brakes. Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) received reports that crews of the Norfolk Southern train pulled the emergency brake, and a mechanical issue with one of the railcar axles was discovered, CNN reported. The possibility of a brake failure points to a behind-the-scenes battle in American railroad regulation — and a place where critics say that both parties have resisted reforms that would make Americans safer. Most trains run on a system where wheels stop one at a time using a compression system, left-leaning news outlet The Lever reported. By contrast, electronically controlled pneumatic brake technology halts all the cars simultaneously — dramatically reducing stopping time. While Norfolk Southern initially touted these advances, it was also part of a coalition of rail companies that successfully fought the regulations, winning a reprieve from the Obama administration and a repeal under the Trump administration, according to The Lever. The outlet reported that the Norfolk Southern train wasn’t regulated as a “high-hazard flammable train” even though its crash triggered a fireball. “Railroads should not use their lobbyists to block or weaken commonsense safety measures that protect workers and communities,” Brown told The Lever. In his statement to The Hill, the Ohio senator called on the NTSB, which is investigating the derailment, to tell Congress and the Department of Transportation what can be done “to avert future derailments involving hazardous materials.” One such measure is before the agency now. Members of multiple railroad unions are fighting a potential rule that would allow trains using the new electronic brakes to travel 2,500 miles — up from 1,500 — without stopping to have their brakes tested. While these trains would have electronic logs, such a ledger “cannot justify reducing the frequency of inspections and repairs to train brakes in the field,” Rich Johnson of the Brotherhood of Railway Carmen said in a statement. “Such changes will almost certainly reduce the overall safety of trains operating across the country,” Johnson added. There is still no explanation of why ECP brakes would have prevented an axle or bearing to break. But the Obama admin exempted this kind of thing anyway, and Trump admin got rid of it. Either way, the ECP issue was not being enforced ever for this situation. mspart
  9. NTSB says: https://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/NR20230214.aspx NTSB investigators have identified and examined the rail car that initiated the derailment. Surveillance video from a residence showed what appears to be a wheel bearing in the final stage of overheat failure moments before the derailment. The wheelset from the suspected railcar has been collected as evidence for metallurgical examination. The suspected overheated wheel bearing has been collected and will be examined by engineers from the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, D.C. So it appears the bearing overheated. I guess we'll find out more when they examine it. mspart
  10. I really hate to ask these questions, but how would ECP brakes have helped in this derailment over the brakes that were fitted on the train? What are ECP brakes and how are they different from other brakes? It takes the same energy to stop a train no matter what. Braking energy is converted to heat energy by friction. That is the nature of brakes. That heat energy will warm up the wheels but most is dissipated at the rim, not at the center where the bearing is. What was the nature of the wheel bearing failure? Probably too early for that assessment. Fatigue? Tensile loading? Heat/cold shock? No grease? I can see the no grease being a potential reason. Missed its maintenance window. Doesn't happen often in a highly regulated industry like trains but it does happen from time to time I'm sure. NTSB will put out their report and that should tell us all we need to know. Unfortunately, that usually takes a year or more. mspart
  11. I read on Yahoo, that the recession will come later in the year. But today was not a good day, that's for sure. mspart
  12. I never went to state. I have excuses for that. Wrestled from 7th to 12 grade. I was a volunteer wrestling throwing dummy coach for many many years and enjoyed that. I love wrestling as a sport but was never really all that good at it as a competitor. mspart
  13. I don't have access to UWW right now. So thank you for that. Sorry for the misdirect. mspart
  14. What are the percentages of TDs in MMA legs and no legs? mspart
  15. I figured Intermat was posting the UWW rankings. If this is intermat's rankings, I should delete this thread. If someone can tell me how to do it, I will. mspart
  16. First, if you wanted to ignore, you would have long ago. This question of mine, that you still have not answered, has been going on for pages in this thread. I asked a very simple question and I will ask it again: Which R in Congress, other than Rick Scott, has proposed altering SS or MC in 2023? That is a really simple question with a really simple answer. The answer is either: a) none or b) name the folks and cite the legislation they have proposed. Very simple. There doesn't need to be a lot of conversation on this. Just answer the question. If you don't want to support your claim, then by all means begin the ignoring. But if you want to support your claim, which you have not yet done and that is really ludicrous in my opinion, support it with facts and data. It is not hard to do, but liberals generally will not put up when asked, they just keep deflecting. That is what is going on here. I have no personal animosity towards you Mike. I love your posts on the international board. You provide good insight there. But on this board, you say things and don't back them up when I've asked. That's what I find curious. Opinions are good, but rather than deflecting you could just say you don't have anything concrete to back up your opinion. Opinions are not necessarily grounded in facts and data. But when you present them as facts, then when called upon, it is not unreasonable to provide the data to support those 'facts'. mspart
  17. I think it could happen. I think other things could happen as well. These high earners are in the upper realms of their companies if not the owners. There are lots of options to show low W2 earnings and still make a lot under the table. Who makes 400k? Certainly not me. Those are reserved for the top guys and they can do things us schlubbs can't. I just was giving one idea of how they might skirt the rules. I'm sure, when properly motivated, CPAs will figure out how to do whatever it takes to shield income from taxation. They already do. mspart
  18. Are you saying that Mike Pence is in Congress and has floated this as a bill? Oh, I thought not. Nice try. It is timely but not on topic. mspart mspart
  19. I think I did and maybe you didn't catch it. The extrapolation depends on everything staying the same. You don't extrapolate on changing conditions throughout the extrapolation. If things change as i suggested that salaries decrease but remuneration is given in other ways to maintain the overall earnings package, then that would be a change the extrapolation couldn't account for. It would be nice if it were linear. If life were linear, things would be so much simpler. mspart
  20. If you would discuss this in any manner, civilly or not, that would be a nice change. I'm only trying to point out that you say things and do not back them up. And when finally pushed to do so, your stuff doesn't back up anything you have said. That really is not so much snide as what I am observing here. If you feel it is snide, that is on you. Moving the goalposts? Not really. I'll restate the question I have repeated over and over and over and over that you have not actually responded to: Which R, other than Rick Scott, has proposed altering SS or MC in 2023? That is a really simple question with a really simple answer. The answer is either none, or these folks and cite the legislation they have proposed. Very simple. mspart
  21. Extrapolation must be used in many cases. But extrapolation doesn't prove your point. Extrapolation, in this case, assumes things will remain as they are today with only one change. But it doesn't take into account that as one thing changes, so may many others. mspart
  22. Finally, something that kind of looks like something. From the TIME article: But Scott wasn’t alone among Republicans in floating ideas that could lead to the paring back of federal entitlements. The Republican Study Committee, a quasi in-house think tank for the House GOP conference, unveiled a 2023 budget blueprint last year that would raise the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 and the Social Security eligibility age from 65 to 69. Thank you for finally providing something that supports your position. The question is, are they acting on this plan? Not to my knowledge. mspart
  23. Are you sure you want to use that one. Where does this document say 100% fixed? mspart
×
×
  • Create New...