Absolutely.
There is no way he or the Touhys knew that you could take 10 day courses (10 day courses?) to get an easy A to replace a semester long F without an Ol Miss shaped birdie whispering in their ear. It is like the Dresser Last Chance Open it is designed for one thing and one thing only.
Honda minivan. Within the last 5 years. Police cars are equipped with license plate readers so that as they pass parked cars they get a hit for anything reported stolen. Technology that invades our privacy can also retrieve our atolen cars.
My sarcastic answer to your sarcastic queation is, the fact that they have a police force for starters.
Also I have a friend who got his car stolen in Chicago. The police recovered it and returned it to him three days later.
This crime is allowed narrative you and a few others have fallen in love with is so unbelievably stupid.
Not at all what I am saying. Fault is not binary. Fault can be assigned for multiple elements of a crime. Stop pretending that suing a car company stops the city from going after car thieves. You know that is not true and you know no such claim is made in that article or any place else. Your logic is just so flawed. And your willingness to jump to ludicrous conclusions based on your flawed logic is regrettable.
I don't even know if Chicago can sue. A judge may decide they do not have standing since they do not own the cars that got stolen. Chicago will argue that the incremental cost of law enforcement (the thing you all want), or some such, gives them standing. We will see what a judge decides.
If they lie about having designs to prevent catalytic converts, then sure.
It isn't a crime to make a crappy car, but it may be a crime to say you made a car with features it did not have.
You guys act like only car companies are being pursued because you read one article that was only about car companies being pursued. And you want to pretend that it is about car design, when it is about lying about car design.
I am not saying the facts of the case are the same. I am saying their motivation for bringing the cases are the same. Pure political opportunism. Populist attempts to play to their base.
If in response to a lawsuit against car companies he asks why he is trying to take money from victims, then yes, he did absolutely say that the car companies are the victims.
Again. Come on.
Don't act like you do not know that is a strategic choice. Why would he offer Kia and Hyundai a defense in the charges?
This is a politician being a politician. No different than DeSantis going after Disney or Abbott going after Blackrock.
And for the completests in the crowd, the years 1970, 1988, 1997, and 2008 were the only freshman-eligible years that did not contribute any wrestlers to the top 230 career scorers at the NCAA tournament.
Another way to think about freshman dominance is to focus on the entire career and then work backwards. You can argue that the top year for freshman is actually the year when the most career top scorers began. There were four years that contributed 6 wrestlers to the eventual top 230.
Who says freshman need time to acclimate to college? Try telling that to the crop that landed in 2015.
Homework Assignment
The title of the table might not be strictly true. I came up with this list from the list of the top 230 scoring wrestlers. So all the ones and twos are missing from my totals. I doubt that has any impact on 2015's status as the year of the freshman, but it certainly could impact the order of every year after that given how tightly bunched they all become. Sooooo, if there is anyone out there who wants to complete the calcs, here is your chance.