Jump to content

Wrestleknownothing

Members
  • Posts

    10,670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    139

Everything posted by Wrestleknownothing

  1. Dammit. Now you have me back to betting. I will take the other side.
  2. After watching Uncut Gems WKN doesn't gamble.
  3. Who says he did? The rest could be ties.
  4. Did he have plastic surgery?
  5. As long as he bet the under he should be flush
  6. The gambler's creed. I wasn't wrong, I was just early.
  7. The D1 Administrative Committee voted to allow athletes to bet on professional sports. Still no betting on college sports. The rule only goes into affect if both D2 and D3 vote to do the same thing. I guess they had to remove some of their hypocrisy with respect to gambling.
  8. Let's Do a little something different this year. With all three services reporting their pre-season rankings I thought I would take a look at expectations. Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting Get a little action in. Let's start with expected finalists. The three services see lineups and weights a bit different at this early stage, but who cares. Let's make some reckless predictions. These are all the teams that have at least a 50/50 shot at one finalist in at least one service. Everyone's All-American Sticking with the same roster of teams, what does the prospect for All-Americans look like? It is interesting to see Iowa State leapfrog Nebraska and Iowa here.
  9. About time Penn State caught a break.
  10. For the gamblers in the crowd... If the pre-season ranks listed above for the twenty wrestlers holds up to be their seeds at the NCAA tournament (they won't), then the over/under for total AA's would be 14.5 (14.7 to be precise). Will 5 of them get injured or under-perform their pre-season expectations enough to make 10 a reasonable O/U at this point? Sure. I don't know. But if you can remove injuries from the denominator then I would definitely take the over.
  11. I would not be surprised if they are in Serbia too as training partners
  12. SVN may be a training partner. Bartlett was Lee's and Lee was Retherford's, etc.
  13. Not when you consider that seven of them plus their training partners will be returning from two weeks overseas three or four days prior.
  14. I wouldn't mind seeing Shayne Van Ness wrestle all ten weights. There is a nut job on the Rutgers Rivals board who claims to be a former AA and big time insider for the program. He makes outrageous claims that never happen. And when they fail to happen he disappears for a while before coming back with a different user name. One of his favorite themes is that SVN is a traitor. I would like to see this guy's head explode.
  15. 20 miles? That's crazy talk. The most I ever swam non-stop was 3.2 miles. The most in a day was 10.
  16. I can't remember the last time I had chocolate milk. Man, that needs to change.
  17. Speaking of Trump and AI, he really is losing the plot: https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2025/09/29/how-trump-boosted-bizarre-medbed-conspiracy-theory-with-deleted-post/
  18. I know your misery would love sime company, but nah.
  19. Your twitter murder porn does not interest me. The algo has its claws deep into your psyche though.
  20. If you cannot spot at least two racist tropes then you do not understand what it means. As for AI it does what it is programmed to do. If Trump instructs it to make a video with racist tropes, it will deliver.
  21. Racist tropes, but there is no way he is racist.
  22. I forgot to mention the 24 ounces of milk. My teeth are like iron.
  23. I just made a grilled cheese with gouda, munster, american, cheddar, havarti, red pepper, tomato, onion, and pickled jalapenos on slices of Costco's rustic itlaian loaf (fantastic bread) prepared in a panini press. Damn good. I can feel my bones getting denser already.
  24. You should read the whole thread. The entire conversation began with Offthemat making the definitive statement "while it is clear he lied" and me responding that based on this indictment it is not clear at all. I have even said in prior posts that he may be guilty. That said, it is clear that this indictment is flimsy. The sole quote in it is not from the person it implies it is from. You may want to re-read that last sentence. It is one page double spaced with zero specifics. Only 14 of 23 jurors voted for only 2 of 3 charges. Eleven or fewer voted for the other charge. It is only signed by a single person. None of the investigators on the case signed the indictment. That is not normal. It was filed by someone who has never done this before. That is not normal. To say this indictment is strong is to ignore the facts.
×
×
  • Create New...