I saw your (I think it was you? Oh, and thanks for coming over, reading, and commenting. I really appreciate it.) comment on the article, so I came to take a peek at what you said here. But first a tangent/rant (completely optional, feel free to skip).
Begin Rant.
Oh My God, you are killing me with the AI. It is not completely wrong, just mostly wrong. Six of the ten scores above are incorrect. That said that is at least partly our fault, as the site as currently configured makes it harder than it should be to get that answer. It is not my site so I don't control that, but I will see what is possible.
But, as I am just over there lending a hand, I do not want to overstep my bounds. I don't pay for the site nor do any of the hard work setting it up and maintaining it. I only provide light data support, analytics, puking words onto a page, etc. And I am keenly aware that @cowcards doesn't have any ads over there (i.e. he is paying for this stuff himself). As I am not a big fan of spending other people's money I do not want to make promises someone else has to keep.
End Rant.
I think you make an interesting point and I have some ideas on how to attack it. Stay tuned for a follow up post. Though I will also pop back in to let you know.