Wrestleknownothing

Post 2014 that is easy (thank you, WrestleStat). Prior to that it is almost impossible (except for Cael Sanderson).

It is a real issue. I remember Ben Askren on FRL laughing about how he went to tournaments with lesser competition just so he could fatten up his pinfall stats.

Hint, hint

You needed to do this earlier in the day. We all know what day it is.

Sadly, yes. Without detailed match by match scores or scoring there really is no way to adjust

Take the exact rankings with a grain of salt. Also consider this a cry for help. I cannot find TF, or MD stats for 1999 Stephen Neal, 2001 Nick Ackerman, 2004 Emmett Wilson, 2007 Ben Askren, or 2010 Jayson Ness. Their dominance scores are higher than what I have hear, as a result. Any help with filling in the missing pieces would be appreciated. I also need breakdowns between TF and MD for 1995 TJ Jaworsky, 1998 Mark Ironside, and 2013 Kyle Dake. For these I know how many combined TF/MD they had, but not the split between TF and MD. I just used a 50/50 split. The net result is that Stephen Neal, and 2007 Ben Askren will be at or near the top if the data can be found.

Lee won the fan vote by a huge margin, 5:1 (25,712 to 5,202) They referenced multiple committee members voting for co-winners. Two years before they released the number of Nolf/Nickal co-votes, but not this year.

God, I hate pie charts

Not that I am aware of

Check your calendar

The year they split (2021) he and Spencer Lee had similar stats for pinfalls and bonus, though Lee was slightly better in both. In 2022 Steveson beat out Yianni Diakomihalis with his 1 pin, but he had a much higher bonus rate that year (83 vs 57). In hindsight, would have been nice to see a four timer get a Hodge.

No one seems to know the date

I cannot imagine. Happy spring.

Consenting adults. If the university is unable to protect itself from an 18/19 year old then they need to find someone who can.

Player to be named later?

I do not think you should

This really is not how mergers are done.

If it isn't the right price then outside shareholders of one of the two might be getting a bad deal. See my commentary above. One other odd thing this reminds me of is both companies apparently used the same investmemt bankers. Hard to ensure a fair price when the majority shareholder of one is the majority shareholder of the other and thr same investment bankers are also on both sides of the "negotiation".

The right price is an issue

See the first question

Yes

I have some follow up questions. Was X for sale? Did Musk solicit any other offers? Does it bother the other shareholders of X or xAI that this was a conflicted transaction? Has this received regulatory approval? Given Musk's control of X, xAI, and the regulators will he even bother? Has the deal closed? Or is it just announced? What protections did minority shareholders receive? Isn't it clear that the prior funding round for X was just used as a way to validate a merger price?

FYI, Pinfalls, defaults forfeits, and disqualifications were 1 team point starting in at least 1928. Edit: And it was actually called a pin fall in 1928.

I am not saying you are wrong, it certainly was reported. I am saying I do not think Starocci is a faithful narrator.

A freakin men.