Wrestleknownothing

Thats not all he had for relaxation.

Classically the reason for a small positive target is that it is nearly impossible to hit a target with precision. Since central banks are trying to avoid deflation they shoot for a modest positive growth rate. As for negative growth (deflation), it is bad for the economy writ large as it encourages businesses to delay investments (or not make them at all) and individuals to delay spending while both hoard cash. Deflation then leads to negative interest rates to discourage savings/encourage investmemts and try to reverse the above trends.

Not to worry after four years as president, and another four years where he could really buckle down and think about it, and another 10 months as president, Trump has the concepts of a plan to replace the ACA. By his fourth term he hopes to have a plan. By his sixth term he hopes to have the concepts of a plan to pass his plan. And by his eighth term he plans to have a plan to pass his plan. By his tenth term he plans to pass his plan. That is if everything goes according to plan.

Trump on the golf course? Could be any day of his presidency. Remember this lie? “I’m going to be working for you, I’m not going to have time to go play golf,” Good times. And that is some pretty wicked drop foot he has going there.

I would not wish that on you so I am willing to take your money off your hands.

No he is not. He wanted to argue that they lost their eligibility because they had a post-season when the NCAA never said that. Yes, they had part of a post-season. No, they did not have a post-season. No, the NCAA never, ever, at all, even a little bit, in any way, implied, stated, uttered, mentioned, referenced anything about the lose of eligibility being due to having any part of a post-season. I know this because the NCAA very specifically, unequivocally, official, precisely stated that senior winter athletes (not just wrestlers) did not get another year because they had completed all or much of their regular season. Yes, he wants to change the subject and make it about the definition of a post-season, but that was not his claim. His claim was the NCAA said they had a post-season. Never happened.

I am saying, and I have been saying, something like three or four times now, that the NCAA never said that they had their post-season in 2020. They did say they had all or much of their regular season. But you already know this and would rather change the subject to deflect. Fine. Deflect.

My problem is that you were trying to gotcha Fly with a technicality without bothering to check if you were technically correct. You were not. The NCAA never said they had a post-season.

Now you are trying to say something different. Fine. I assert that you made a factually incorrect statement (in an attempt to gotcha fly - one of the top, least agenda-ed posters on the site) when you claimed the NCAA said there was a post-season because in their press release where they explicitly stated the logic for their decision they specifically did not mention that there was a post-season. Here is the press release: https://www.ncaa.org/news/2020/3/30/division-i-council-extends-eligibility-for-student-athletes-impacted-by-covid-19.aspx You will find no mention of post-season anywhere in it. What you will find is the following sentences where they explain their reasoning: "Winter sports were not included in the decision. Council members declined to extend eligibility for student-athletes in sports where all or much of their regular seasons were completed." Now feel free to show me where the NCAA said things that are not covered by the press release like they had a post-season.

Do you really think I did not look this up before responding? Or that I did not use the exact language they used in their press release?

Incorrect. The NCAA declined to extend the eligibility of student-athletes where all or much of their regular season was completed. They said nothing about post-season.

Today is the rarest of days. NFL, MLB, NBA, and NHL are all playing tonight.

The contract has it structured that way already. What LSU is likely proposing is to make it a lump sum payment instead in exchange for a haircut on the total amount owed (as well as recognizing the time value of money). For example, $800k a month for the next 66 months (roughly what he will get) equals $52.8 million total dollars. But if you assume interest rates are 4% then it is worth $47.4 million in today's dollars. So maybe LSU offers him $40 million as a lump sum with some amount held back to cover any future offsets. Or maybe they offer him $20 million plus wiping out the offset language. That way if he gets another job he won't have to forfeit any payment from LSU. A lot of ways you can go with this, but it is only because they included the offset language that LSU has any leverage in a negotiation.

Pretty wild to see Forrest getting horsed around the mat by Uulu and still coming away with the victory. To be out muscled and still put three four pointers on the board is a statement of extreme technical proficiency. Very impressive.

The link to save a minute searching:

Ah, ah, ah. You forgot mentality.

A function? Sounds like you are wearing an ascot.

Aside from his pace, skill, NCAA and World titles is he elite?

I got a laugh out of this on The Ringer website

Since Bob and Husker don't frequent these parts, I DMed them as that generates an email. I suggest you all do likewise.

Using Flo, Intermat and Wrestlestat the expectations are for roughly 3 AA's for the conference. Sadly, Bakersfield had no top 33 ranked wrestlers in any service. Though there is about a 15% chance of 4 or more AA's for the conference (this time using Flo only):

@BobDole, @Husker_Du if anything, it is worse. I have rebooted, tried multiple computers and phones, and it is the same everywhere. I pull 300 Mbps down and push 170 Mbps up. The issue is not our stuff, but Intermat's.

Amen, brother. We are all dealing with something. It fills me with happiness that you are choosing to fight. I was very happy to see you return to the board after a long absence. I instantly remembered you when you began posting again. I will make you the same offer that you made. If you need to talk DM me.