Wrestleknownothing

@Jason Bryant do you recall who the admin for the site is?

Thanks. Weird. I am still getting 404 using the bookmark I created years ago and if I type in the URL.

It seems wrestlingstats.com has gone offline this morning. It was there last night, but mow the URL results in a 404 Not Found error. Does anyone have any insight?

Yes, the same ones that Trump made a point of saying would be released as part of his campaign promises. The same ones Biondi said are sitting on her desk. The same ones Kash Patel said had a list of clients that later made his eyes bug out so horribly. The same ones that Elon Musk said contained Donald Trump's name. The same ones Trump has worked so hard, and so successfully, to distract you from. Yes, those.

Will they share the results the day after they share the Epstein Files?

I read somewhere that the first thing they do when you are elected president is plan your funeral. Can't get caught off guard. Now, this whole Trump is dying because his hand is bruised is pretty dumb. He is old. Old people have paper skin. Paper skin bruises.

I did not say there were any. As a matter of fact it is what everyone, save one person, wants. So that one person needs to generate daily distractions. Stay distracted.

It is working. Talk about this instead of the Epstein Files.

Have I got good news for you. Per the Gerrymandering Project who "bridges the gap between mathematics and law" there are fifteen states that get a failing grade (D or F). Of those two create no partisan advantage (Tennessee, Louisiana). Five create a Democratic advantage (Oregon, New Mexico, Nevada, Illinois) Nine create a Republican advantage (Utah, Texas, Kansas, Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina) The Democratic bias states have a total of 36 seats. The Republican bias seats have a total of 132 seats. https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/

And yet it is your impotent rage I find more entertaining.

Sadly, your level of dumb is not an act.

Not surprised in the least that you don't understand the difference between how and why either.

The only time I worry about being wrong is when you agree with me.

Is @Offthemat's mommy here to stick up for him? Boo hoo.

Not only did I answer his question, he even thanked me for answering his question. You brought up why, as though why was the question. Why was not the question. At the risk of quoting someone who does not know the difference between how and why, "Now you've lost track of your conversation".

It is you who has lost track. The question was how, you brought up why.

I understand that shallow is your specialty, but I do not have the first clue why they vote differently on presidential elections than gubernatorial ones. If you want to know, do some research. Don't just let others do the thinking for you.

So far your argument for is cuz Trump said so. Meanwhile, the gerrymander project gives them an overall A grade and an A for partisan fairness. You are not bright, but you are loyal. A perfect Trump Republican.

Yes. From 1992-2024 a Democratic candidate has won Massachusetts every time with 60% - 66% of the vote. The last time a Republican won the presidential vote in Massachusetts was 1984 (Reagan vs Mondale). That is 10 straight elections where they voted for a Democratic candidate for president, yet in the same time they have had 5 Republican and 2 Democratic governors. The reality of Massachusetts is that 64% of voters are neither enrolled as Democrat or Republican. Meanwhile only 26% are registered as Democrat and only 8% are registered as Republican. So unlike the sheep @Offthemat and @El Luchador, sometimes they vote one way, sometimes they vote the other way. They clearly view state politics differently than national politics.

Your inability to grasp simple concepts makes me feel better about what I said, not worse.

And nothing else? That is the dumbest thing you have said yet. Odd shapes are not the goal, they are the result. The goal is to over ride the true representation of a district. That is what gerrymandering is about, and nothing else. The shape is the tool not the goal. And Massachusetts does not have oddly shaped districts like North and South Carolina, Illinois, Maryland and Texas. I know you really want to believe it is true about Massachusetts, but it just isn't despite the fact that gerrymandering was invented there. https://gerrymander.princeton.edu/redistricting-report-card?planId=recCUmeKhThrNstI9

Oh ye of little brain. The reason Republicans have zero Reps in Congress is because Massachusetts is not gerrymandered. State rules say each district must contain one ninth of the state's population (~780k). If you took any single person in Massachusetts and chose the 780k citizens closest to them, Trump would have lost every single dis9ltrict, every time. There is not a single part of the state that contains enough Republicans to constitue a majority unless you gerrymander.

24 of the last 34 years Massachusetts has had a Republican governor. Top notch research.

Melania hasn't been in his bedroom in decades.