Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

how about you two just dm each other.

Or someone at least ask the other one out. All of this flirting is making me a little frisky.

Edited by JimmyCinnabon
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, bnwtwg said:

@BobDole @Husker_Du I'm asking, begging... reactions be damned. Please ban this twat waffle. Please.

I don’t know if it has been mentioned, but nm1965’s account was created right after this blew up the first time here. Coincidence? Given his pooh-poohing of the allegations against the creepy video maker … I don’t think so… gtfoh Nima 

Edited by Fred
Posted
41 minutes ago, Fred said:

I don’t know if it has been mentioned, but nm1965’s account was created right after this blew up the first time here. Coincidence? Given his pooh-poohing of the allegations against the creepy video maker … I don’t think so… gtfoh Nima 

Just trying to bait everyone. The easy solution is to press the ignore button and be an adult.

9yeaQ7C.jpeg

 

i am an idiot on the internet

Posted
3 hours ago, Fred said:

I don’t know if it has been mentioned, but nm1965’s account was created right after this blew up the first time here. Coincidence? Given his pooh-poohing of the allegations against the creepy video maker … I don’t think so… gtfoh Nima 

That would explain why he's stalking me. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Fred said:

I don’t know if it has been mentioned, but nm1965’s account was created right after this blew up the first time here. Coincidence? Given his pooh-poohing of the allegations against the creepy video maker … I don’t think so… gtfoh Nima 

I've never even heard of this topic until some dickhead stuck it in the college forum, asshole. And who the hell are you?? I've never seen you in this forum at all, and you have less than 200 msgs. 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, bnwtwg said:

Just trying to bait everyone. The easy solution is to press the ignore button and be an adult.

9yeaQ7C.jpeg

 

So, dumb cunt, why did you attack me? All I did was state I didn't see anything pornographic, then you acted like the stupid moron you are with a personal attack on me, who hadn't said anything to you. You are quite stupid and didn't realize you were attacking someone new to the conversation. 

BUT THAT'S WHAT DUMB CUNTS DO, ISN'T IT? CONFUSE THEMSELVES? 

If you wasn't a complete and total piece of shit you'd apologize for the mistake, but since you are a toddleresque, low IQ simpleton, that is quite a leap to make, isn't it? 

Edited by NM1965
Posted
6 hours ago, El Luchador said:

That would explain why he's stalking me. 

Trumpanzees suffer from many delusions, don't they? That's due to mental illness and low IQ. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, NM1965 said:

Trumpanzees suffer from many delusions, don't they? That's due to mental illness and low IQ. 

Oh my you really put me in my place with that superior intellect.  Sorry I disappointed you by not providing an actual link to the pissing video. I'm sure you had your hopes up.

Posted
6 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Oh my you really put me in my place with that superior intellect.  Sorry I disappointed you by not providing an actual link to the pissing video. I'm sure you had your hopes up.

You should change your name to El Suckador, cultist. 

Posted
On 1/6/2026 at 8:56 AM, fishbane said:

I don't think this is new.   The lawsuit was filed a while ago and this forum and Flyingcement made an appearance in the litigation.  

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilndce/1:2024cv01969/456255/80/

This moron is trying to bring MORE attention to this? 

I'd seen his videos and watched them as a Wrestling fan... and then I read the thread on here, went back and watched his videos and looked at the comments. Seems pretty clear there was something else going on there. I don't want to be testifying in court about this, but reading the comments, people didn't have a clue about Wrestling and the camera was oddly focused on particular shots. 

Hope Schwabb wins this and he's gotta take whatever he's made and pay her legal bills for this bullshit.  

Posted
On 1/7/2026 at 10:24 PM, NM1965 said:

What makes you think I'd be interested in something like that? 

You're comments taking an interest in a screen shot that was shared to a VIDEO in which you proclaimed the poster was lying because in the SCREENSHOT there wasn't a puddle of piss on the floor. 

Now when he says, 'well, if you want, I CAN show you the video,' the larger point being... look at how the algorithm works. 

I remember pretty well when this broke. I was completely ignorant about how these videos were being used or... how they were being shot, so I didn't have an opinion.

Ignorant +no opinion is better than Ignorant and strong opinion.

 

Looking at some of it...and even then, mostly the comments and the times in the video when people were talking about how "red is a ferocious young fighter," despite the fact that... Red losses and they stamp a time when all you see is his ass starting at the screen, things like that COULD inform you. 

Or you could just choose to argue because you don't like @El Luchador and his politics. Which... I don't either, but that doesn't make me reflexively argue with him about a site that clearly caters to adults who like watching children in high definition and care about the results of the match about as much as most people care about the carpentry skills of many other ACTUAL ADULT videos....

Posted
9 hours ago, scourge165 said:

This moron is trying to bring MORE attention to this? 

I'd seen his videos and watched them as a Wrestling fan... and then I read the thread on here, went back and watched his videos and looked at the comments. Seems pretty clear there was something else going on there. I don't want to be testifying in court about this, but reading the comments, people didn't have a clue about Wrestling and the camera was oddly focused on particular shots. 

Hope Schwabb wins this and he's gotta take whatever he's made and pay her legal bills for this bullshit.  

I think it’s just the opposite.  He wants people to not talk about it and I’d say it’s working.  No one that he has sued has mentioned it since and suing users on X and this forum for their comments creates a chilling effect where people don’t want to talk about it.   As you said they don’t want to end up in court.  Even if they successfully defend the lawsuit they will likely have to pay their own legal bills which will be substantial.

I was incorrect in the comment you quoted.  I thought the lawsuit mentioned in the article was an old case.  I was wrong.  Gharavi had sued Schwab in Illinois back in March 2024, but she was dismissed from that case.  The article is a new case Gharavi filed in IA on 12/29/2025.  Schwab had made her tweet on 12/30/2023 so this is barely within the two year statute of limitations in IA.  This makes three active lawsuits with Gharavi as the plaintiff. 

1) The original case in IL from March 2024.  The remaining defendants in that case are Mineo, Jagger, FlyingCement, Antitroll2828, JessBlogs (default), Saylor (default), MatScouts (default), Kolankowski (default), and John Does #4-25 (as of yet unidentified).  Jagger appears to be on the precipice of default, but is in settlement talks and not defaulted yet.  Flyingcement and Antitroll2828 have filed motions to dismiss which have not been ruled on yet.  Mineo appears in it for the long haul as his previous motion to dismiss was denied.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68322736/gharavi-v-flosports-inc/

2) The case in DE against FloSports filed in December 2025.  Flo was involved in the IL case but like Schwab were dismissed for jurisdiction.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72003444/gharavi-v-flosports-inc/

3) The IA case against Schwab filed in December 2025.  Interesting Gharavi is representing himself in this case unlike the IL and DE cases.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72085095/gharavi-v-schwab/

Posted
8 hours ago, scourge165 said:

You're comments taking an interest in a screen shot that was shared to a VIDEO in which you proclaimed the poster was lying because in the SCREENSHOT there wasn't a puddle of piss on the floor. 

Now when he says, 'well, if you want, I CAN show you the video,' the larger point being... look at how the algorithm works. 

I remember pretty well when this broke. I was completely ignorant about how these videos were being used or... how they were being shot, so I didn't have an opinion.

Ignorant +no opinion is better than Ignorant and strong opinion.

 

Looking at some of it...and even then, mostly the comments and the times in the video when people were talking about how "red is a ferocious young fighter," despite the fact that... Red losses and they stamp a time when all you see is his ass starting at the screen, things like that COULD inform you. 

Or you could just choose to argue because you don't like @El Luchador and his politics. Which... I don't either, but that doesn't make me reflexively argue with him about a site that clearly caters to adults who like watching children in high definition and care about the results of the match about as much as most people care about the carpentry skills of many other ACTUAL ADULT videos....

I regret I even saw this topic. After my first baffled response, one dick said I should be banned. He's apparently a very stupid guy who thought he was arguing with somebody else, that's all I can assume since I hadn't said a single word in the topic up to my initial baffled response. 

So to sum up, there's an undefined guy from this forum who was putting wrestlers on a pervy forum. There's a big lawsuit and flyingcement is one of the witnesses. That's about what I gathered. 

I went back and watched that match again that fishbane told me about, and saw one of the guys adjusting his prick, lol. I guess as a wrestler you don't really watch for that kind of stuff, everybody does it when their pecker gets bound up. If that turns somebody on I find it difficult to express how truly pathetic that is. 

Whatever, I'm sick of dealing with this topic. I wouldn't have even looked at this thread at all if I wasn't insanely bored at the time.  That brings up the question: what the hell is this topic doing in the college wrestling forum?

Posted
4 minutes ago, NM1965 said:

So to sum up, there's an undefined guy from this forum who was putting wrestlers on a pervy forum. There's a big lawsuit and flyingcement is one of the witnesses. That's about what I gathered. 
…

That brings up the question: what the hell is this topic doing in the college wrestling forum?

Not witnesses.  Flyingcement,  Antitrol2828, Huskerdu, and Mineo28 are users in this forum that created and/or commented in the old thread from Dec 2024 about creeps in wrestling.  They are DEFENDANTS in the lawsuit for defamation for things said both in that thread and elsewhere.  Gharavi is seeking in excess of $75,000 in damages from them.  At trial he will likely ask for far in excess of $75k.  That is probably the minimum he was required to plead for that court.

I don’t know about anything else, but you seem to pick up things veeeery slowly.  
Ties to college wrestling include the wife of a college wrestling coach (Allyson Schwab is the wife of UNI head coach Doug Schwab) being a defendant in the case, alleged defamation in this forum (a college wrestling message board), and the plaintiff being kicked out of a college wrestling tournament (2023 Midlands) by a college wrestling coach (Storniolo) as a result of the defamation alleged in the case. Northwestern head coach Matt Storniolo’s text messages are an exhibit in the lawsuit mentioned in the article.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.iand.70261/gov.uscourts.iand.70261.1.2.pdf

Posted
17 hours ago, fishbane said:

I think it’s just the opposite.  He wants people to not talk about it and I’d say it’s working.  No one that he has sued has mentioned it since and suing users on X and this forum for their comments creates a chilling effect where people don’t want to talk about it.   As you said they don’t want to end up in court.  Even if they successfully defend the lawsuit they will likely have to pay their own legal bills which will be substantial.

I was incorrect in the comment you quoted.  I thought the lawsuit mentioned in the article was an old case.  I was wrong.  Gharavi had sued Schwab in Illinois back in March 2024, but she was dismissed from that case.  The article is a new case Gharavi filed in IA on 12/29/2025.  Schwab had made her tweet on 12/30/2023 so this is barely within the two year statute of limitations in IA.  This makes three active lawsuits with Gharavi as the plaintiff. 

1) The original case in IL from March 2024.  The remaining defendants in that case are Mineo, Jagger, FlyingCement, Antitroll2828, JessBlogs (default), Saylor (default), MatScouts (default), Kolankowski (default), and John Does #4-25 (as of yet unidentified).  Jagger appears to be on the precipice of default, but is in settlement talks and not defaulted yet.  Flyingcement and Antitroll2828 have filed motions to dismiss which have not been ruled on yet.  Mineo appears in it for the long haul as his previous motion to dismiss was denied.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68322736/gharavi-v-flosports-inc/

2) The case in DE against FloSports filed in December 2025.  Flo was involved in the IL case but like Schwab were dismissed for jurisdiction.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72003444/gharavi-v-flosports-inc/

3) The IA case against Schwab filed in December 2025.  Interesting Gharavi is representing himself in this case unlike the IL and DE cases.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72085095/gharavi-v-schwab/

Well... having been around Wrestling for so long, I watched it and didn't think anything of it... 

And then you start just picking up on things. You have... Bassett and Rayney when they were going back and forth and you have this other match that's not for anything getting more views and then they're zeroing in on a kids bulge or weird stuff like that... and THEN you read the comments and... it's clear he knows what he's doing and he's not just being innocent... I don't think... he does also have a better camera, so... I'll allow for a small chance that he just happens to catch videos that some sick fcks like and someone else is stealing them and only his videos end up on adult websites. 

A VERY small chance. An... infinitesimally small chance. 

Posted
On 1/9/2026 at 8:44 AM, fishbane said:

Not witnesses.  Flyingcement,  Antitrol2828, Huskerdu, and Mineo28 are users in this forum that created and/or commented in the old thread from Dec 2024 about creeps in wrestling.  They are DEFENDANTS in the lawsuit for defamation for things said both in that thread and elsewhere.  Gharavi is seeking in excess of $75,000 in damages from them.  At trial he will likely ask for far in excess of $75k.  That is probably the minimum he was required to plead for that court.

I don’t know about anything else, but you seem to pick up things veeeery slowly.  
Ties to college wrestling include the wife of a college wrestling coach (Allyson Schwab is the wife of UNI head coach Doug Schwab) being a defendant in the case, alleged defamation in this forum (a college wrestling message board), and the plaintiff being kicked out of a college wrestling tournament (2023 Midlands) by a college wrestling coach (Storniolo) as a result of the defamation alleged in the case. Northwestern head coach Matt Storniolo’s text messages are an exhibit in the lawsuit mentioned in the article.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.iand.70261/gov.uscourts.iand.70261.1.2.pdf

!!!! 

Thanks for filling me in on everything fishbane, much appreciated!!

Posted
13 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Well... having been around Wrestling for so long, I watched it and didn't think anything of it... 

And then you start just picking up on things. You have... Bassett and Rayney when they were going back and forth and you have this other match that's not for anything getting more views and then they're zeroing in on a kids bulge or weird stuff like that... and THEN you read the comments and... it's clear he knows what he's doing and he's not just being innocent... I don't think... he does also have a better camera, so... I'll allow for a small chance that he just happens to catch videos that some sick fcks like and someone else is stealing them and only his videos end up on adult websites. 

A VERY small chance. An... infinitesimally small chance. 

That's the same progression I had when exploring this. Common sense tells me something ain't right. When I click on a million views wrestling match I expect an amazing match. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...