The "left" is more violent 😂

[mspart]

Agreed

mspart

[Gene Mills Fan]

55 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Don't get yourself Charlie Kirk'd now. 

Pretty violent suggestion: you "left" ?

[Bigbrog]

1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

Don't get yourself Charlie Kirk'd now. 

Wow...just WOW...you continue to be a complete piece of  of a person...please just leave the boards

[Tripnsweep]

1 hour ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

Pretty violent suggestion: you "left" ?

He was shot and killed while deflecting a question. 

[JimmySpeaks]

[mspart]

8 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

He was shot and killed while deflecting a question. 

So he deserved it because he deflected a question?  Or was the shooter there ready to kill him no matter what he said.   You make it sounds like if he had answered a questions with something different, Mr. Kirk would still be alive and well.   

mspart

[Tripnsweep]

25 minutes ago, mspart said:

So he deserved it because he deflected a question?  Or was the shooter there ready to kill him no matter what he said.   You make it sounds like if he had answered a questions with something different, Mr. Kirk would still be alive and well.   

mspart

Yep that's exactly what I said

I'm just pointing out that we could call the action of deflecting a question and then being shot afterwards being "Kirk'd". One doesn't necessarily have to do with the other, and unless Robinson had super human hearing, I doubt he knew he even shot him at that exact moment. 

[Gene Mills Fan]

54 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

He was shot and killed while deflecting a question. 

So killing because he deflected is Kirk'd now and its OK; non violent, fool.

[Tripnsweep]

54 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

So killing because he deflected is Kirk'd now and its OK; non violent, fool.

Just a term for a set of circumstances. That way we don't have to keep describing it, we can just say he got "Kirk'd". 

[mspart]

You might want to rethink this line of thought.   It is not funny and it is quite rude.  It is not becoming.  

mspart

[ionel]

16 minutes ago, mspart said:

You might want to rethink this line of thought.   It is not funny and it is quite rude.  It is not becoming.  

mspart

It's kind've like rv's "wingers" and other name calling like "fascist."  Just drop the name calling and have a reasonable conversation. 

And yes both sides need to do so.  

Edited 16 hours ago by ionel

[JimmySpeaks]

 They’re coming for you 

[Scouts Honor]

his lying eyes and ears no longer useful

he turned to a leftist rag

[Tripnsweep]

6 hours ago, mspart said:

You might want to rethink this line of thought.   It is not funny and it is quite rude.  It is not becoming.  

mspart

Since when does the right care about that? You elected a felon as president who refuses to release information on a sex trafficker he was best friends with. Until you decide protecting pedos isn't OK I don't think that anything is out of bounds. Unless you all of a sudden don't think that making jokes about the deceased or victims of crime is acceptable only when it goes one direction. 

[JimmySpeaks]

43 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Since when does the right care about that? You elected a felon as president who refuses to release information on a sex trafficker he was best friends with. Until you decide protecting pedos isn't OK I don't think that anything is out of bounds. Unless you all of a sudden don't think that making jokes about the deceased or victims of crime is acceptable only when it goes one direction. 

Ice ice baby. Your family is next to get deported. Ba byyeeeeeeee 

Edited 9 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[scourge165]

On 9/16/2025 at 9:31 PM, Caveira said:

Sounds like an angry response 

 

Do these comments sound angry?

Yes — they very clearly sound angry. Some indicators:

• Strong insults: Words like “lying scumbag,” “simple minded piece of toilet trash” are hostile attacks meant to belittle or degrade.

• Aggressive tone: The language is confrontational and demeaning.

• Emphasis/punctuation: Using periods (“.”) after short phrases can add emphasis; the phrasing is sharp.

So the overall tone is definitely angry, hostile, personal.

If you want to use ChatGTP, lets use it for political violence;

Prompt;

"How much of the Political Violence has been Left Wing vs Right Wing the past 30 years."

Short answer: Most evidence shows the bulk of ideologically-motivated lethal political violence in the U.S. over the past ~30 years has come from far-right actors, not the left. The exact share depends on the dataset and definitions, but several high-quality analyses put the right-wing share well above 80% of lethal incidents and deaths in the period 1990–2024. Office of Justice Programs+1

Details and key sources

• A 2024 National Institute of Justice (NIJ) synthesis (drawn from three decades of NIJ-funded research) found far-right actors were responsible for far more lethal events and deaths than far-left actors: roughly 227 lethal far-right events (≈520 deaths) vs 42 far-left events (≈78 deaths) since 1990 — meaning the far right accounted for roughly 84–87% of those ideologically-motivated homicides in that period (depending whether you count incidents or deaths). (NIJ summary). Office of Justice Programs

• Independent academic work reaches similar conclusions: University of Maryland / START research and peer-reviewed comparisons show right-wing extremist violence has been substantially higher than left-wing violence in the U.S. in recent decades (especially after the 2010s). Start UMD+1

• Other expert assessments (CSIS, ACLED US Crisis Monitor) document that white-supremacist / antigovernment / militia-style violence and threats rose sharply in the 2010s and especially around the 2020 election and January 6, 2021; ACLED’s U.S. monitoring also shows concentrated spikes in right-wing militia activity and violence. CSIS+1

Caveats & why precise percentages vary

1. Definitions differ. Some datasets count only lethal “ideologically-motivated homicides,” others include plots, arrests, property attacks, threats, or non-lethal assaults. Which events are labelled “left” vs “right” can also vary. National Institute of Justice

2. Time period matters. Including 9/11 and international Islamist terrorism changes totals dramatically for some time windows; excluding those makes the domestic far-right share even larger in recent decades. PMC

3. Under-reporting & classification. Some incidents are ambiguous or never prosecuted as “ideologically motivated,” and researchers must make judgment calls. That causes small differences between datasets. National Institute of Justice

If you want this broken down numerically for a specific dataset/timeframe, I can pull the counts and compute percentages (for example: NIJ/TEVUS, START/GTD, ACLED US Crisis Monitor, or FBI summaries) and show a short table comparing incidents, deaths, and arrests by ideology. Which dataset or exact years do you want me to use?

 

 

 

Go ahead, ask XAI or Grok... you're not going to find this idea that supports that the left is the "more violent" of the two sides. 

And while people clutch their pearls about comments made about Kirk, those were Ugly. But you had Kirk himself mocking Paul Pelosi, calling for Biden's Execution, you have Republican Senators mocking the Minnesota Senators who were shot, namely Mike Lee, "Nightmare on Waltz Street," which... wasn't even clever, there was much lower hanging fruit that he didn't go for, but nobody has accused him of being particularly bright. 

[scourge165]

On 9/16/2025 at 9:53 PM, Caveira said:

You don’t see this behavior from parents teaching kids this in republican households.  Prove me wrong 

 

EASY.

The Shooter. 

Though... this video is just exceptionally obnoxious. "The best news ever," should be kids... I dont' know, going to Disney or whatever. NOT listing off 4 people they wish died, then having the answer being someone they've never met getting married.

 

BUT.... again, you want examples of kids on the right? This is so ridiculous. We've been hearing about this upcoming Civil War. It was the looming "threat" if Trump lost. Most of you on here still believe Jan6 was "a glorified tour of the Capitol." 

[scourge165]

17 hours ago, jross said:

Is this claim specific to political violence or violence in general?

I'm sorry, are you being serious?

You can be dubious of the source, but it... couldn't be more clear. 

"None of the last 31 political attacks was by anyone from 'the Left'. Not one. We can count them."

That's the headline. 

But yes... that  does beg the question, are they talking about political violence or violence in general...

C'mon. You can do a BIT better than that. 

[scourge165]

2 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

Since when does the right care about that? You elected a felon as president who refuses to release information on a sex trafficker he was best friends with. Until you decide protecting pedos isn't OK I don't think that anything is out of bounds. Unless you all of a sudden don't think that making jokes about the deceased or victims of crime is acceptable only when it goes one direction. 

It's been a while in my experiance... but I certainly think it helps differentiate when we start celebrating and mocking the death of a 31 year old Father(as distasteful as some of his comments were). 

I thought we MOSTLY agreed that the things Mike Lee said were pretty screwed up... and while he's a Senator and... I don't know what you are, just like Trump getting shot at, this is in NO WORLD good for the the left, the Country. It only galvanizes the right and... I think most normal people find it... kinda disgusting. 

 

And... we're not talking about Trump and Epstein any longer.

[Scouts Honor]

what kills you makes you stronger?

[jross]

Following Monty Python logic of ducks = witches...

Given certain demographics commit more criminal violence, and that demographic is a majority democrat supporting block, the left is more violent.

Given certain demographics are more prone to commit legal violence against "clumps of cells of the human species," the left is more violent. 

Survey support responses for violence is greater from the left than the right. 

I have not verified but will trust that the right has committed more political violence against individuals for a period.

While correlation doesn’t equal causation, it is fact that of the relative small number of people committing violence, the majority is left.  

 

Edited 57 minutes ago by jross

[JimmySpeaks]

Since 1975 politically motivated murders have accounted for 0.35% of total murders.  83% of all the politically motivated murders we’re committed on 911. 

[El Luchador]

https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52960-charlie-kirk-americans-political-violence-poll

 

By the numbers 

[JimmySpeaks]

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states
 

When compared to the total violence that’s gone on in America since 1975 politically motivated violence is a nothing burger.  

[El Luchador]

5 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52960-charlie-kirk-americans-political-violence-poll

 

By the numbers 

This poll makes it very clear who supports violence even if we can't agree on who is doing it.