Jump to content

I Really Enjoyed the Carter starocci on the Mount Rushmore of wrestling era……..


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Lleynor said:

Who had him as top 4??

I’m feeding the trolls.  I have made a ton of posts saying he doesn’t belong on it.  Some of the psu faithful don’t like said posts.   

Posted
2 hours ago, MPhillips said:

Which finals opponent of his are you discarding?

I give Mekhi the win bc of Carter locking hands during rideouts but that has nothing to do with Covid years and everything to do with me being an extreme homer.

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 1
  • Jagger 1
Posted
Just now, BAC said:

Delete "feeding" and the "s" on trolls, and you'd be on point. 😉

Stop shaming women for reporting rape and you’d be on point.  

  • Bob 2
Posted

Over on the Penn State forum, a lot of the cult members (who preach "In Cael We Trust") are either defending Starocci (passively, actively, or passive aggressively), criticizing the reporting (when they are also unaware of what fully happened), or questioning Bartlett's account, words, or actions in either staying at Penn State through the years or now leaving.  It's such a cult obsessed with Iowa; prone to religiosity; and focused on excommunicating anyone who doesn't toe the party line.  

While one naturally shouldn't "convict" solely on this basis,  Starocci's character, as evidenced by his words, tweets, macho posturing and preening, threats to others, and self-involvement have repeatedly raised questions about who he really is; whereas Bartlett comes across as a likable stand-up guy, a supportive team member, and a humble athlete who respects his opponents.   

  • Fire 1
Posted
8 hours ago, SocraTease said:

Over on the Penn State forum, a lot of the cult members (who preach "In Cael We Trust") are either defending Starocci (passively, actively, or passive aggressively), criticizing the reporting (when they are also unaware of what fully happened), or questioning Bartlett's account, words, or actions in either staying at Penn State through the years or now leaving.  It's such a cult obsessed with Iowa; prone to religiosity; and focused on excommunicating anyone who doesn't toe the party line.  

While one naturally shouldn't "convict" solely on this basis,  Starocci's character, as evidenced by his words, tweets, macho posturing and preening, threats to others, and self-involvement have repeatedly raised questions about who he really is; whereas Bartlett comes across as a likable stand-up guy, a supportive team member, and a humble athlete who respects his opponents.   

You must have read a different thread than I did.

  • Bob 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
20 hours ago, mspart said:

No one should be eligible for 5 seasons in college.   Or else everyone should be eligible.  I count him as a 4 timer, not a 5 timer. 

mspart

 

20 hours ago, MPhillips said:

Which finals opponent of his are you discarding?

Clearly they all happened. But I am of the opinion that the fifth one is irrelevant for deciding Mt. Rushmore status. And now I feel a little icky about the other four.

  • Jagger 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted

Being the only '5' timer makes it so he likely deserved a spot.

All this?  Gone.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, MPhillips said:

@mspartis only counting four.

Nobody should get a 5th season in college sports.   You get four.   Is there a new grade level in college I am unaware of?   freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, and then what?   There is no other "then what".   There are 4 years of eligibility.   Starocci should not have been allowed to compete last year in my humble opinion.   You guys can't make me believe it should be otherwise.   You can criticize me for my position but you can't make me believe that for a very short period of time, people deserved a 5th year when no one else does outside of that time frame.  It's a ridiculous concept. 

mspart

  • Jagger 1
Posted
On 6/26/2025 at 11:28 AM, Caveira said:

I’m feeding the trolls.  I have made a ton of posts saying he doesn’t belong on it.  Some of the psu faithful don’t like said posts.   

No, your logic was SO stupid.

It was after the Iowa duel and you thought because Ferrari ran from him for 7 minutes that you were justified in "pre-emptively," keeping him off Mt Rushmore and saying he stalled...when up until that point, he had bonus points in every match but one. 

Posted
5 hours ago, mspart said:

Nobody should get a 5th season in college sports.   You get four.   Is there a new grade level in college I am unaware of?   freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, and then what?   There is no other "then what".   There are 4 years of eligibility.   Starocci should not have been allowed to compete last year in my humble opinion.   You guys can't make me believe it should be otherwise.   You can criticize me for my position but you can't make me believe that for a very short period of time, people deserved a 5th year when no one else does outside of that time frame.  It's a ridiculous concept. 

mspart

Yeah...but it still happened...even if it's stupid. 

To go down this road, Hendrickson's title over Stevenson doesn't count.

And what do you do with Brooks or Nick Lee? Guys who were 1 or 2 seeds and had just 1 loss each(which they'd avenged). 

 

How would you have done it?

If you lost the ability to compete in the tournament in '20, you get an extra year, but no more than 4? So Brooks still gets the 4 and Starocci and he are done the same year...conversely, Lugo, Pletcher, Moore...Lee, they get another year?

Posted
20 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah...but it still happened...even if it's stupid. 

To go down this road, Hendrickson's title over Stevenson doesn't count.

And what do you do with Brooks or Nick Lee? Guys who were 1 or 2 seeds and had just 1 loss each(which they'd avenged). 

 

How would you have done it?

If you lost the ability to compete in the tournament in '20, you get an extra year, but no more than 4? So Brooks still gets the 4 and Starocci and he are done the same year...conversely, Lugo, Pletcher, Moore...Lee, they get another year?

Nick Lee got 4 years. Lugo, Pletcher, Moore, Hall, Joseph (and others I am forgetting) got short changed.

  • Bob 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...