Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I found the BTN broadcast to be overly draw out.   Should they hold the 3rd and 5th place matches before the finals?   It feels like the finals broadcast could be a better product if you don't have to wait until the 3rd and 5th places matches are completed to move to the next weight and the crowd is yelling at odd times if you are only a TV viewer.

I have attended 2 B1G Championships and also don't like it as an attendee.    The Sunday morning session is just consi semis before a long break until finals.  Then your attention is split when you would like to focus on just the finals matches. 

With TV ratings being important for the sport, should BTN try to make the finals a better product?

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 6:53 PM, Dogbone said:

I found the BTN broadcast to be overly draw out.   Should they hold the 3rd and 5th place matches before the finals?   It feels like the finals broadcast could be a better product if you don't have to wait until the 3rd and 5th places matches are completed to move to the next weight and the crowd is yelling at odd times if you are only a TV viewer.

I have attended 2 B1G Championships and also don't like it as an attendee.    The Sunday morning session is just consi semis before a long break until finals.  Then your attention is split when you would like to focus on just the finals matches. 

With TV ratings being important for the sport, should BTN try to make the finals a better product?

Expand  

Big 12 does it the way that you suggesting with a separate round for the finals.

  • Wrestle 1
Posted

Reforming the challenge & review process would go a long way. There was one consi match in particular that held things up forever because of the lengthy review. The finals would also be much more interesting if a decent chunk of it wasn't a bunch of officials looking at tape over and over again.

  • Bob 1
Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 6:53 PM, Dogbone said:

I found the BTN broadcast to be overly draw out.   Should they hold the 3rd and 5th place matches before the finals?   It feels like the finals broadcast could be a better product if you don't have to wait until the 3rd and 5th places matches are completed to move to the next weight and the crowd is yelling at odd times if you are only a TV viewer.

I have attended 2 B1G Championships and also don't like it as an attendee.    The Sunday morning session is just consi semis before a long break until finals.  Then your attention is split when you would like to focus on just the finals matches. 

With TV ratings being important for the sport, should BTN try to make the finals a better product?

Expand  

Taking three hours to decided 10 winners is bruuuuuuutal bad TV. And pretty bad in person.

Sitting there we kept commenting to each other how the B1G set up makes for such bad TV that you will never capture more than the diehards.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 6:53 PM, Dogbone said:

I found the BTN broadcast to be overly draw out.   Should they hold the 3rd and 5th place matches before the finals?   It feels like the finals broadcast could be a better product if you don't have to wait until the 3rd and 5th places matches are completed to move to the next weight and the crowd is yelling at odd times if you are only a TV viewer.

I have attended 2 B1G Championships and also don't like it as an attendee.    The Sunday morning session is just consi semis before a long break until finals.  Then your attention is split when you would like to focus on just the finals matches. 

With TV ratings being important for the sport, should BTN try to make the finals a better product?

Expand  

So no one thinks they should have 15 minutes of commercials between each match, 10 is enough?  🙄

.

Posted

Agree finals should be separated from the 3rd/5th matches.  It also detracted from those matches too.  I like the multiview in the earlier rounds but that was not an option for finals

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 9:44 PM, 1032004 said:

Agree finals should be separated from the 3rd/5th matches.  It also detracted from those matches too.  I like the multiview in the earlier rounds but that was not an option for finals

Expand  

They were on multi-view on Big Ten+....I had that on my computer/monitor.....finals on my smart TV.

Posted

And another thing: why did they have a 6'4'' guy interviewing the winners, and making even Gable look tiny? Perfect job for Shane Sparks! Or the guy that used to do the interviews. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 7:00 PM, Wrestleknownothing said:

Taking three hours to decided 10 winners is bruuuuuuutal bad TV. And pretty bad in person.

Sitting there we kept commenting to each other how the B1G set up makes for such bad TV that you will never capture more than the diehards.

Expand  

I've said this before regarding NCAA finals. 10 matches in a 3 1/2 to 4 hour broadcast is rough.

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 10:02 PM, 500 wrestler said:

And another thing: why did they have a 6'4'' guy interviewing the winners, and making even Gable look tiny? Perfect job for Shane Sparks! Or the guy that used to do the interviews. 

Expand  

I was joking with my wife about this. He was bending over to talk to Starocci even. 😂

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 9:59 PM, Fadzaev2 said:

They were on multi-view on Big Ten+....I had that on my computer/monitor.....finals on my smart TV.

Expand  

Yeah I would have liked to see finals with commentary plus multiview of 3rd/5th on same screen 

  • Bob 1
Posted (edited)
  On 3/10/2025 at 9:44 PM, 1032004 said:

Agree finals should be separated from the 3rd/5th matches.  It also detracted from those matches too.  I like the multiview in the earlier rounds but that was not an option for finals

Expand  

I had the 3/5th matches on the app on multi mat mode.  
 

the format does suck and 3/5 matches should be in the am sequence 

Edited by Caveira
Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 10:19 PM, MPhillips said:

Mine was an honest question...

Expand  

If wikipedia is to be trusted..  Starocci is 5'11". I was able to find the interview with Gable quicker than Starocci so see below. The interviewer has to be at least 6'7".

image.png.229a14e90e7c7d1777ffc7f0ccf3faf0.png

Gable claims 6'1"

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 11:37 PM, BruceyB said:

If wikipedia is to be trusted..  Starocci is 5'11". I was able to find the interview with Gable quicker than Starocci so see below. The interviewer has to be at least 6'7".

image.png.229a14e90e7c7d1777ffc7f0ccf3faf0.png

Gable claims 6'1"

Expand  

I don't think Gable is even 6'

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted (edited)
  On 3/10/2025 at 10:02 PM, 500 wrestler said:

And another thing: why did they have a 6'4'' guy interviewing the winners, and making even Gable look tiny? Perfect job for Shane Sparks! Or the guy that used to do the interviews. 

Expand  

he made Carter look downright unimpressive lol. Give Carter a step stool or something c'mon!

Edited by okokzach
Posted

The semi-finals are a way better round to watch than the finals, both on TV and at the tournament.

The TV delays and podium stuff, and especially any review or blood delay make it take so long for just 10 matches.

The energy in the arena is also just dead in the single match finals. I agree that they should not hold the finals for the place matches, but I like having them there. Sometimes I want to watch a different match.

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 10:02 PM, 500 wrestler said:

And another thing: why did they have a 6'4'' guy interviewing the winners, and making even Gable look tiny? Perfect job for Shane Sparks! Or the guy that used to do the interviews. 

Expand  

I was thinking the same thing.  So funny, some of the lightweights are barely over 5'0".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...