25th Amendment

[headshuck]

It's GreatWhiteNorth. Same shitty attitude.

Really? Haha! GreatWhite once scolded me for misunderstanding that Biden’s dementia was simply a studder.

[Ohio Elite]

20 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Really? Haha! GreatWhite once scolded me for misunderstanding that Biden’s dementia was simply a studder.

Lol, ya Jross called him out awhile back. He's a simpleton..

[RockLobster]

15 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Man...you are a whackadoodle.  You say you have "good intentions"...that is absolutely laughable.  And it would be one thing if you were arguing with everyone about the actual topic at hand, but you get in stupid name calling back and fourths with people and they are 99% of the time YOUR fault.  YOU are the problem.  But like I said, go ahead and keep on keeping on...it at least gives most of a us a good laugh at your expense.

By the way...glad to see you are back at it posting your nonsense BanBasketball

Read back to my post. I actually commended you on making a post that was a good conversation starter.

Then you immediately called me names and attacked me.

Seems you have no interest in starting a conversation (which - if you've forgotten - is the reason this place exists.)

Be hateful if you must - blame others if you must - bitch and bitch, and then bitch more.

That's what most of these clowns do here (both from the US and some paid by other countries.)

But think seriously about one thing - and it is an important one:

When was the last time you actually made an original point and led a legitimate conversation?

Edited July 7 by RockLobster

[Scouts Honor]

On 7/6/2024 at 2:01 AM, RockLobster said:

Now THAT is an interesting conversation starter.

If someone appears here and argues with 95% of the people... does that make them bad?

Maybe an old tired idea needs to be replaced with a better one.

Maybe the messenger (me) has good intentions but is met with nothing but hate.

It all depends on how you look at it, doesn't it.

if the person who argued with 95% actually made a point, instead of an insult in every post...

you might have some credibility here

[ionel]

11 hours ago, headshuck said:

Really? Haha! GreatWhite once scolded me for misunderstanding that Biden’s dementia was simply a studder.

9 doctors out of 10, including Dr Jill, say its just a studder.  

[Offthemat]

45 minutes ago, ionel said:

9 doctors out of 10, including Dr Jill, say its just a studder. 

Top Parkinson’s disease specialist visited White House 10 times since 2022: Visitor logs

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/3071976/bidens-physician-met-top-parkinsons-disease-specialist/

 

Studders are mostly illegal these days. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 7 by Offthemat

[RockLobster]

16 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

if the person who argued with 95% actually made a point, instead of an insult in every post...

you might have some credibility here

I've said it before and it seems I have to say it again.

This isn't a popularity contest. You make arguments against the things you disagree with.

It doesn't matter if you disagree with few or if you disagree with many.

If you are confident in your belief, and are interested in shouting it out loud, the percentage is irrelevant.

(I could do without the insults - but when met with insults, it is a reality that some people only speak that language.)

[Husker_Du]

Rock, can you please start debating topics/points and not calling everyone stupid?

the ratio of you debating the subject:: ad hominens is overbearing. 

[nhs67]

@RockLobster, please see above.

[Scouts Honor]

9 hours ago, RockLobster said:

 

(I could do without the insults - but when met with insults, it is a reality that some people only speak that language.)

see this is the part i dont get. i have never used any of the language or tone you do

[mspart]

2 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

see this is the part i dont get. i have never used any of the language or tone you do

But he feels that you are and that is enough to go crazy on the keyboard.  It is enough for any leftist  to have their feelers hurt to personally lash out.  It is in their DNA. 

mspart

[RockLobster]

16 hours ago, nhs67 said:

@RockLobster, please see above.

Thanks. You have the common decency of communicating and that is appreciated.

[RockLobster]

14 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

see this is the part i dont get. i have never used any of the language or tone you do

Maybe read back and think with an open mind.

I don't have all the answers, nor do you.

But maybe there's middle ground somewhere in reconsidering.

It's worth a shot.

[RockLobster]

11 hours ago, mspart said:

But he feels that you are and that is enough to go crazy on the keyboard.  It is enough for any leftist  to have their feelers hurt to personally lash out.  It is in their DNA. 

mspart

Mspart, that is a legitimately terrible post.

"Any leftist ... in their DNA" as if they are all the same is not a kind or respectful thing to post.

Thankfully, I'm not a leftist so it doesn't apply to me.

But be nice. It's pretty easy, and it is usually welcomed by all. 

Being mean to leftists is similar to being mean to rightists. It's not welcomed well and accomplishes nothing.

[RockLobster]

18 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

Rock, can you please start debating topics/points and not calling everyone stupid?

the ratio of you debating the subject:: ad hominens is overbearing. 

Got it, Chief. 

The ratio is close to 1-to-1 when you consider the ad-hominem posts that are coming at me to start with.

But - no matter - I can adjust toward your guidelines.

We're all here to share ideas. And we can't do that without some level of comprimise.

[Husker_Du]

i applaud your effort.

no one wants the place to be a silo of agreeable ideas. 

but everyone should ask themselves 'does what i'm about to post further the conversation or rather get into a personal pissing contest'? 

and by everyone, i mean me too. i have to remind myself of that often.

[ThreePointTakedown]

On 6/28/2024 at 12:39 PM, nhs67 said:

You can't be this dense, can you?

Sorry for my short absence. 

To answer the original question. I don't think they both have committed crimes. One seems to have because they have been brought up on charges. Also convicted. With maaaaaany more to go. 

But you dodged my questions. You can take another swing if you'd like. 

Or you can point out your reason(s) for believing they both have committed crimes? If you have no good evidence why do you hold to that belief? What do you have to gain? 

[nhs67]

2 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Sorry for my short absence. 

To answer the original question. I don't think they both have committed crimes.

I stopped reading here.  Have a good day.

[ThreePointTakedown]

10 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

I stopped reading here.  Have a good day.

And any decent person would set me straight with facts if they had them available. I guess you don't.

Pity. 

Another one bites the dust. 

That was quick.

Who's next?

[Scouts Honor]

14 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Maybe read back and think with an open mind.

I don't have all the answers, nor do you.

But maybe there's middle ground somewhere in reconsidering.

It's worth a shot.

i agree. 

your posts say everyone you disagree with is an idiot.

[nhs67]

5 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

And any decent person would set me straight with facts if they had them available. I guess you don't.

Pity. 

Another one bites the dust. 

That was quick.

Who's next?

What are you on about?  Clearly you're delusional, bud.  Try living in the real world instead of your mum's basement.

[Offthemat]

 

[JimmyBT]

7 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

 

He needs to step down 

[ionel]

59 minutes ago, JimmyBT said:

He needs to step down 

There's nothing in the Constitution that says you have to have a functioning brain to be President correct?  

[Offthemat]

7 minutes ago, ionel said:

There's nothing in the Constitution that says you have to have a functioning brain to be President correct?  

The ability to “discharge the powers and duties of his office” is the prominence of the 25th Amendment.