Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

But Joe is proud that Hunter doesn't know how to check boxes on an application.  🙄

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted

Yes, perhaps there will be an appeal.   Vak - What basis would you think an appeal could be successful?  What did the court get wrong that prejudiced the jury?  What misconduct of attorneys or judge or court personnel are subject to appeal?

I have no idea.   I don't see a route to appeal but they can do so.   I'm just not sure there is much of a basis for one.

mspart

Posted
8 minutes ago, mspart said:

 What basis would you think an appeal could be successful? 

On the basis that their client was on drugs when filling out the form asking if he was on drugs.  The court should not expect an accurate answer, it just ain't fair.  

  • Bob 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
17 minutes ago, mspart said:

Yes, perhaps there will be an appeal.   Vak - What basis would you think an appeal could be successful?  What did the court get wrong that prejudiced the jury?  What misconduct of attorneys or judge or court personnel are subject to appeal?

I have no idea.   I don't see a route to appeal but they can do so.   I'm just not sure there is much of a basis for one.

mspart

No idea.  You'd have to really be in the courtroom to know if there are real grounds for an appeal; even if there aren't, though, an appeal will almost invariably be filed. The most commonly successful appeals tend to be based on pre-trial rulings in my experience.

Posted

There is an effort, maybe even a case initiated, to rule the law he was found guilty of, unconstitutional.  It does seem to have some merit. 

Posted
3 hours ago, VakAttack said:

And now the appeals process begins.

 

2 hours ago, VakAttack said:

You'd have to really be in the courtroom to know if there are real grounds for an appeal ...

but see above from the OP.  🤔

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
43 minutes ago, ionel said:

 

but see above from the OP.  🤔

You could have read what came after the word "appeal" in the second quote.

 

52 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

There is an effort, maybe even a case initiated, to rule the law he was found guilty of, unconstitutional.  It does seem to have some merit. 

Interesting. Based on a pure 2A "right shall not be infringed...." argument?  I've often wondered after Heller whether felons would be able to challenge the loss of thwir gun rights. 

Posted

We've gone from "he will be acquitted to appease the Biden Crime Family" to "actually, he will be convicted as part of an effort to the even DEEPER conspiracy."  Yeesh.

Posted

Anyway, just as with the Trump case, I think this will be bogged down in the appeal process and eventually...just go away with a slap on the wrist.

  • Bob 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

We've gone from "he will be acquitted to appease the Biden Crime Family" to "actually, he will be convicted as part of an effort to the even DEEPER conspiracy."  Yeesh.

You do realize that Hunter and his laptop still have trials to face, don’t you?

Posted
Just now, Offthemat said:

You do realize that Hunter and his laptop still have trials to face, don’t you?

...I don't care if Hunter faces trials.  I hope he gets convicted of whatever he's guilty of.  None that has anything to do with my post that you're quoting.

Posted
2 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

...I don't care if Hunter faces trials.  I hope he gets convicted of whatever he's guilty of.  None that has anything to do with my post that you're quoting.

So you’re surprised that different folks, including lawyers, have different views?  That some view with tunnel vision, and others from 30,000 feet above?

  • Bob 1
Posted
Just now, Offthemat said:

So you’re surprised that different folks, including lawyers, have different views?  That some view with tunnel vision, and others from 30,000 feet above?

LOL.  It's the same people shifting their view to match what they wish to believe.

Posted

So appears our election option vote for:

- a felon

- the proud father of a felon

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
4 minutes ago, ionel said:

So appears our election option vote for:

- a felon

- the proud father of a felon

The two choices suck, but not for these reasons.

I don't think people over 65 should be eligible for this position.  JMO.

  • Bob 1
Posted
Just now, VakAttack said:

The two choices suck, but not for these reasons.

I don't think people over 65 should be eligible for this position.  JMO.

I agree.

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted

What presidents have been over 65 when they were elected?   Seriously, I know Trump and Biden, but are there any others?   How were they?

mspart

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, mspart said:

What presidents have been over 65 when they were elected?   Seriously, I know Trump and Biden, but are there any others?   How were they?

 

     

 

 

9 William Henry Harrison Feb 9, 1773 68 years, 23 days
Mar 4, 1841
68 years, 54 days
Apr 4, 1841
15 James Buchanan Apr 23, 1791 65 years, 315 days
Mar 4, 1857
69 years, 315 days
Mar 4, 1861
40 Ronald Reagan Feb 6, 1911 69 years, 349 days
Jan 20, 1981
77 years, 349 days
Jan 20, 1989
45 Donald Trump Jun 14, 1946 70 years, 220 days
Jan 20, 2017
74 years, 220 days
Jan 20, 2021
3 years, 144 days
77 years, 364 days
46 Joe Biden Nov 20, 1942 78 years, 61 days
Jan 20, 2021
(incumbent)

 

 

Edited by ionel

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...