Jump to content

Woke Translator: 2023 Edition


jross

Recommended Posts

What is missing?

Hate = disagreement

Far right = conservative

Racist = white conservative

White supremacist = conservative (any race)

Fascist = conservative

Gender = personality + preference

Transphobia = acknowledging biological reality

Gender affirmation = rejection of biological reality 

Misinformation = inconvenient fact

The Science = government approved scientific claim

Science/climate denial = questioning government approved scientific claim

Expert = person with degree aligned with mainstream

Assault weapon = black coloured rifle

Violence = hurting feelings of woke person 

Anti-vaxxer = person who opposes vaccine mandates and/or refused C19 jab

Diversity = fewer white men

Woman = unknown

 

From https://twitter.com/zubymusic/status/1679054617206824962

 

  • Fire 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

this is a notable one, and immediately goes in to my lexicon

 

image.png

This could be the most ridiculous thing ever, but I like it. Vagina sounds too clinical. Bonus hole sounds like fun.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't the term bonus hole sound like that is a good thing to have?   It's a bonus?   Isn't that an attack on those without a bonus hole?  In trying to be gender neutral, they are actually being gender specific.   This is pathetic by any standard. 

mspart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

White Privileged = Successful 

Oppressive = Patriotic

Anti-Black = Pro-Law Enforcement 

Resident (person in jail) = Inmate

Unhoused Neighbors = Homeless 

Supervised Injection Site = Trap House

Anti-Racism = Racism

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Husker_Du said:

who sounds persecuted?

do you not see the ridiculousness in it? 

Sure, that bonus hole thing sounds ridiculous, but from what I can tell it comes from one random charity in England where they offered it in their literature as a suggested alternative to check w/ people if they'd be more comfortable with that language, not a demand from the medical community that the language be changed for everybody all over the world.  So yes, it sounds stupid to me, but it's a tiny thing from one group offered as a suggestion, not a "rebranding of the vagina."  If we're going to get mad about every dumb thing someone says in the world...

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Theo Brixton said:

I'll become much more interested in trans-women when doctors can make holes that surpass the vagina. I think that might mark the singularity. 

Here’s the thing, Theo…

Transwomen are women, so if you’re not into transwomen, you are not into women.

If you are not into women, you are either gay or asexual; therefore, if you are not into transwomen, you are either gay or asexual.

Congratulations! You are now a member of LGBTQIATS+!

Game. Set. Match.

IMG_1862.gif.04e52b4eb87af824b65f1a7063eb941a.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, DJT said:

Here’s the thing, Theo…

Transwomen are women, so if you’re not into transwomen, you are not into women.

If you are not into women, you are either gay or asexual; therefore, if you are not into transwomen, you are either gay or asexual.

Congratulations! You are now a member of LGBTQIATS+!

Game. Set. Match.

IMG_1862.gif.04e52b4eb87af824b65f1a7063eb941a.gif

You can include AI-VR-R in my letters. I just hope I live long enough to see artificial intelligence, virtual reality and robotics merge into the ultimate user experience. This will surely mark the end of humanity and I hope it is the one that our AI overlords grant us...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, VakAttack said:

Sure, that bonus hole thing sounds ridiculous, but from what I can tell it comes from one random charity in England where they offered it in their literature as a suggested alternative to check w/ people if they'd be more comfortable with that language, not a demand from the medical community that the language be changed for everybody all over the world.  So yes, it sounds stupid to me, but it's a tiny thing from one group offered as a suggestion, not a "rebranding of the vagina."  If we're going to get mad about every dumb thing someone says in the world...

Cmon, Vak. you're being disingenuous.

the whitewashing of language is both ridiculous and pervasive. 

someone (stanford maybe) did away with calling it 'field work'.

'birthing people' for what used to be known as 'women'

etc etc.

it's not the end of the world, but it's comical. 

  • Fire 2

TBD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

Cmon, Vak. you're being disingenuous.

the whitewashing of language is both ridiculous and pervasive. 

someone (stanford maybe) did away with calling it 'field work'.

'birthing people' for what used to be known as 'women'

etc etc.

it's not the end of the world, but it's comical. 

Language has changed throughout the history of the world.  We use different language now than we used when I was born in 1983, which was different than language we used when my father was born in 1954, which is different from when his father was born, and so on and so forth.  I'm not being disingenuous.  I don't care.  You might care, and that's fine.  Different strokes.  I'm far more concerned with other things in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DJT said:

Here’s the thing, Theo…

Transwomen are women, so if you’re not into transwomen, you are not into women.

If you are not into women, you are either gay or asexual; therefore, if you are not into transwomen, you are either gay or asexual.

Congratulations! You are now a member of LGBTQIATS+!

Game. Set. Match.

IMG_1862.gif.04e52b4eb87af824b65f1a7063eb941a.gif

You are just brilliant, probably the smartest person alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VakAttack said:

Language has changed throughout the history of the world.  We use different language now than we used when I was born in 1983, which was different than language we used when my father was born in 1954, which is different from when his father was born, and so on and so forth.  I'm not being disingenuous.  I don't care.  You might care, and that's fine.  Different strokes.  I'm far more concerned with other things in the world.

it's a conversation. i didn't say i'm concerned about it.

but you intimated that it's not a recurring thing when it indeed happens with increasing frequency all because of 'feelings' and sensitivity. 

stanford published a whole list of new terminology they were going to implement.

do you not recall the roundly mocked list of terms PETA put out a couple years ago?

if you don't find it interesting or humorous, fine. but i do. 

TBD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...