Jump to content

Husker_Du

President
  • Posts

    2,910
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Everything posted by Husker_Du

  1. sudden victory is a recipe for nonsense. think it through.
  2. it's going to be UWW FS rules with some exceptions. i'm gonna do away with amplitude as criteria. last point scored is the only tie breaker. no one - not the athletes, fans, or coaches - wants to spend the last 30 seconds calculating. there's going to be 8 weights. closely aligned w/ existing UWW weights.
  3. also, Larry Nassar should be thrown at her, you dippy
  4. idk how dumb a person can be. particularly when i just mentioned this. strip away everything Gaines said. fine. say it's stupid. What Simone said was so dumb, she recanted publicly. stop being 'us vs. them' and debate the the actual topic. you're not interested in a dialectic, you're interested in the soap opera and your side winning.
  5. Let's get back to the essence of this.... how many of you think Men competing against Women is fine? Lead with your chests. Cmon tough guys.
  6. lol. no. absolutely not. you're getting caught up in the theater. one is saying 'men in women's sports is wrong' the other is saying ... idk what she's saying b/c she reneged on it all publicly. bottom line, if you think men competing vs women is ok, you're either a moron or trying to be ok with the liberal mob. it's nonsense.
  7. all you're doing now is Gaines vs. Biles. it's theater, and we are now very aware of your stance. move on.
  8. 1032004 - you're all in on the tabloid stuff and nothing of the substance. it's mind numbing and stale. we get it. you don't like Riley Gaines. neat. how bout stick to the actual topic?
  9. 2028 Big Board updated today. I think it's deep. (but i always think it's deeper FR->SO) who you like? https://rokfin.com/ranking/4412/2028-Big-Board-Expanded-to-125
  10. Just about everything is finalized. But I thought I'd take it to the boards to leave no stone unturned.... If you were starting a league, what would you like to see? what would your rules be? what weights? what structure?
  11. what does that have to do with Simone? i'm talking about what Simone said. i'm not interested in choosing sides. i'm interested in the argument's substance.
  12. Simone's message was f'ing stupid. another bleeding heart with no substance that wants to play shoot-the-messenger. she got embarrassed.
  13. again - i'm not looking at hypothetic Snyder vs. Gable in a wrestling match. i'm looking at the paper resume. 3 > 2
  14. if it's such a small number, then it won't require a lot of matches/heats/games/events if it's not such a small number, then it validates the need for the third division. just thinking out loud.
  15. this might be stupid, so don't rake me over the coals on it...just an idea... why dont organizations just have a third division? the number of teens identifying as the opposite sex is going thru the roof. give them their own division.
  16. fair point. it is more interested.
  17. LIa Thomas. We're talking about Lia Thomas. nothing changed, except the division she swam in. i said it. not riley gaines. now discuss its merits as if you weren't tribal. don't say 'yeah but it's only one race' don't say 'yeah but it's rare' discuss if it's a level playing field.
  18. I always called him Cherati to differentiate from Reza. mfers need to respect The Leopard of Juybar
  19. PIAA is a trainwreck. so who knows what they'll do. they've sanctioned teams and individuals for a kid who has always lived in his district going from a private and enrolling in his legitimate public HS. and they've also let others go. Notre Dame had to wrestle AAA last year for 'transfers'. (they're a freaking private school) from a few years ago but McCort - who are represented by 5 states, were AA. it's nonsense.
  20. you have to be an absolute moron to meet Gaines' position with 'but you still finished behind other girls'. as if the debate depends at all on the person saying it. someone that was a dude last week, competing against the women this week has nothing to do with any person talking about it. it's called 'genetic fallacy' debate the merits of the argument. the author/speaker is irrelevant.
  21. i wouldn't use videos of practice to make an 'all time' assessment. Gable lost his last match. his two ncaa losses were to 1-timers.
  22. i don't look at it that way (perhaps i'm not looking at it the way i should) i'm looking at very simply 3 > 2 who would win at their peak...idk. who would win now?? we might find out soon
×
×
  • Create New...