Something I've heard from coaches is that Fargo and other freestyle events tell them who is willing to work year round and to go out of their comfort zone learning new things.
So, you're suggesting that common sense would tell them that adding this technology to what they already did (as has been shown on this- and the other- thread) would CAUSE this problem? Especially since this hasn't been shown to be the case in the two previous years of using it.
Of course not (assuming you mean between matches). Mats having been sterilaser "treated" are ready within seconds. Mopping takes minutes to dry and even if quick dry it would still take noticeably longer to be able to get out there. In rereading yours it's not clear you realized they did the once over after every few bouts per mat. They likely mopped AFTER the sessions.
Interesting. About 30 years ago when they cut the coaches to 3 full and 1 limited there were lawsuits then which led to the NCAA making the limited volunteer.
I have no idea if they do or don't work (and I read some of the responses) but just because we fans only saw them using the sterilazers doesn't mean they weren't also washing between sessions like always.
It is a problem that needs to be addressed.
Adam Sandurski (No Penn State jokes please) 7'
I remember Chasimikov picking him up like a rag doll. I think he helicoptered spun him.
And somehow when the weight class dropped to 264 (120kg) he made it.
A minor thing about the first Med F being a loss. I think it would have to be termed a forf rather than med (or we come up with a new term) as it would be complicated after the fact to decide which one is which if you are looking at the OPC after the fact. I'm not opposed and would not be opposed to calling them all losses. As I've posted previously, I'm the one when working the head table at NCAAs back in the 90s that asked for the term. It was just for purposes of clarification. Never thought of the possible "side effects" that would be added. So I'm looking for clarification again.
I have to bring this up regularly. They experimented with that about thirty years ago. First event, they had to bring one of the kids to the hospital. Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk
Wow, the score showed tied. It took both points to do that. Why would they review to see if he won by one point or two? Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk
You're missing the obvious in that both points went up on the board. If the refs didn't make the call they wouldn't have needed to have the review. They could have just said that they didn't make the call. Then Lehigh might have been able to throw the brick.
I kidded the mom once about literally being My Three Sons (Mason, Carson, Pierson). She told me one of the kids (Must be Mason since he was the oldest) came up with the other two names- they all have connections with towns in Colorado.
Rylan Rogers was at Blair in 2020. Transferred out.
Trent M is a third Mastrogiovanni also on the team in 2020.
I was wondering if this thread was about what happened at Blair a few years ago surrounding the Mastros and also the Ferraris.