1032004

Yeah he seems like a guy that could keep a lot of matches close but not win many. He apparently also lost to Caleb Smith in SV. But also won in SV against his teammate that was 2-12 last year

Surprised Campbell would hold that many guys out

Neither mine nor the comment from @Wrestleknownothing that I quoted said anything about what the content was that advertisers were not happy about their ads being placed near. But it’s certainly notable that Elon basically admitted that was happening.

Yes I was aware, that doesn’t change my statement.

So no evidence Joe Biden took bribes, thanks for confirming

I see people and media outlets claiming the answer is zero based on this comment from Musk, but it’s not clear to me if he is just referring to himself here

Is there evidence Joe Biden took bribes? If so shouldn’t he have been removed from office? Interesting you bring up prostitution (in relation to Hunter), as there is some evidence Gaetz solicited a prostitute as well. And don’t say “but the DOJ didn’t charge Gaetz,” since they didn’t charge Hunter for soliciting a prostitute either.

Yes. Then he also wrestled in 2 meaningless duals 2 weeks later (despite not wrestling in the dual that same day where Cornell ducked against Iowa State).

Nice crowd. Barraclough vs Amine starts around 2:08:00, although there wasn’t too much action until about 35 seconds to go in the third

This sounds like an admission of WKN’s comment (from a different thread):

So kinda like the report James Comer released about Joe Biden then? (With the bad habits belonging to Hunter, who does not hold a political office)

IMO, one particular move of his that I think contradicts the claim that he “values the mission of X over financial considerations” is taking away legacy blue checks from notable people in favor of the Premium system. As a user, I preferred it when someone with a blue check was not just anyone that paid $8 or whatever the cost is now. But I understand that he wants to try to make money too. Anecdotal, and I won’t get into the “more hate speech” allegation, but I’ve noticed more porn accounts replying in unrelated threads than pre-Musk. Oddly seems to be common under the replies of low-view tweets about college wrestling.

Don’t want to speak for him but I think he’s implying consistently working that amount of hours could be at least part of the reason for some of those things. And if so I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with that

I guess this is more what I was getting at. I think some would argue the best employees aren’t necessarily the ones who work 80 hour weeks, it’s the ones that can get done in 20 hours what another person gets done in 40.

55+ is much different than 80+. And “when needed” is much different than making it an apparent requirement

55+ is much different than 80+

Don’t know much about Vivek, but for Elon I’d guess this statement isn’t mutually exclusive from the one of mine you quoted.

Well now he’s bringing on guests (his wife) and comparing himself to Russell Crowe in Gladiator

It’s also probably not a job for anyone with a family or with a family that they like

I don’t really care that there are 2 people leading the department, although I do think it’s funny to joke about it. Just like it’s funny to joke about them telling people to apply via DM but then the DM’s not actually being open. I do think Vivek was probably gunning for a more important/official position though. My 2 for 1 comment was in relation to the posting saying they’re expecting people to work 80+ hours a week. Could be wrong but I believe there have been studies done showing that worker productivity declines at that level of hours.

I kinda feel bad for Vivek TBH. He seems like a smart guy, but he spent his whole campaign simping for Trump with the likely hope of a cabinet position, only to be forced to share a role with Elon that’s not even a real cabinet position and that Elon will probably try to make most of the decisions for

Well, paying 1 person to work the hours of 2 people is one way to get perceived efficiency I guess. Also, Lol:

IMO there is a bit of an “unwritten rule” for Flo to let athletes be the ones to announce their commitments, although I’m not sure how often they are told directly by the athlete or just hear it through other sources. So for commitments I see no issue with Flo not reporting what they hear. I do think they could/should report more on what they hear on other topics though, provided it’s not told to them by someone who specifically says don’t report it. I can’t think of a specific example off the top of my head but I know there have been multiple times where they clearly know something and hint at it, but won’t just come out and say it.