Jump to content

1032004

Members
  • Posts

    7,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by 1032004

  1. Interesting that he shares screenshots where Greenberg talks about Venmo payments, but doesn’t explain his own Venmo payments to Greenberg, especially considering according to his writing Gaetz seems to have known all along that Greenberg was a POS
  2. In this case it was to point out the hypocrisy of those convinced that Joe Biden is corrupt, but have no issue with Gaetz “because they didn’t press any charges.” Let’s stick to Gaetz then. Why wouldn’t anyone want to see the bipartisan ethics committee’s report if it’s already finished?
  3. Did they at least put some of the donations into an investment fund or something?
  4. Why? Still would need an escape + takedown or takedown in SV to win, and if take bottom you run the risk of getting ridden yourself. And if start neutral and get a TD you can still give up an escape and win. That’s basically the exact scenario a 3 pt TD was intended for IMO, most would likely agree that it is better to get a TD than 2 escapes. Obviously it didn’t work out for Bailey in that scenario but I think he made the right choice of position.
  5. Not like that, worst I heard in his Flo interview was “everyone thinks he has good cardio, but I kind of disagree. His cardio when he wrestled Aaron wasn’t as great.”
  6. Was randomly scrolling wrestlestat and came across Drexel’s Giuseppe Hoose, who had previously been at Hofstra, Buffalo, and Oklahoma before coming to Drexel for his 7th year (looks like he got a medical as a true freshman in 2019 and then was one of the lucky ones to take a redshirt in 2020). Any others?
      • 2
      • Fire
      • Haha
  7. Yeah he seems like a guy that could keep a lot of matches close but not win many. He apparently also lost to Caleb Smith in SV. But also won in SV against his teammate that was 2-12 last year
  8. Surprised Campbell would hold that many guys out
  9. Neither mine nor the comment from @Wrestleknownothing that I quoted said anything about what the content was that advertisers were not happy about their ads being placed near. But it’s certainly notable that Elon basically admitted that was happening.
  10. Yes I was aware, that doesn’t change my statement.
  11. So no evidence Joe Biden took bribes, thanks for confirming
  12. I see people and media outlets claiming the answer is zero based on this comment from Musk, but it’s not clear to me if he is just referring to himself here
  13. Is there evidence Joe Biden took bribes? If so shouldn’t he have been removed from office? Interesting you bring up prostitution (in relation to Hunter), as there is some evidence Gaetz solicited a prostitute as well. And don’t say “but the DOJ didn’t charge Gaetz,” since they didn’t charge Hunter for soliciting a prostitute either.
  14. Yes. Then he also wrestled in 2 meaningless duals 2 weeks later (despite not wrestling in the dual that same day where Cornell ducked against Iowa State).
  15. Nice crowd. Barraclough vs Amine starts around 2:08:00, although there wasn’t too much action until about 35 seconds to go in the third
  16. This sounds like an admission of WKN’s comment (from a different thread):
  17. So kinda like the report James Comer released about Joe Biden then? (With the bad habits belonging to Hunter, who does not hold a political office)
  18. IMO, one particular move of his that I think contradicts the claim that he “values the mission of X over financial considerations” is taking away legacy blue checks from notable people in favor of the Premium system. As a user, I preferred it when someone with a blue check was not just anyone that paid $8 or whatever the cost is now. But I understand that he wants to try to make money too. Anecdotal, and I won’t get into the “more hate speech” allegation, but I’ve noticed more porn accounts replying in unrelated threads than pre-Musk. Oddly seems to be common under the replies of low-view tweets about college wrestling.
  19. Don’t want to speak for him but I think he’s implying consistently working that amount of hours could be at least part of the reason for some of those things. And if so I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with that
  20. I guess this is more what I was getting at. I think some would argue the best employees aren’t necessarily the ones who work 80 hour weeks, it’s the ones that can get done in 20 hours what another person gets done in 40.
  21. 55+ is much different than 80+. And “when needed” is much different than making it an apparent requirement
×
×
  • Create New...