jross

https://web.archive.org/web/20130126100829/https://www.caelsanderson.com/blog/no-to-national-duals/ Key points Less funded programs will lack talent to field a fully competitive team. Fans will not travel twice in a season for both a Team's Dual and an Individual Tournament. 50 programs will never make it to the team competition and have increased risk of being cut. The Individual Tournament sells out because of fan and media support for 77 programs. The Individual Tournament provides a greater sample size for proving who the best team is. National duals will not grow wrestling; non-competitive youth programs build wrestling. Teams are already reducing their scheduled events. There are other outside-the-box tactics to grow wrestling and get wrestling on TV.

My friend T-Money trained for years and did the local circuits with Harley Race. There is a learning curve... Gable seems naturally cocky and he holds it back some for the traditionalists... He should let it out on the pro circuit.

Gable will do well if he lets his ego loose. Be more like Macho Man, Ric Flair, or hate on others like Iron Sheik. Maybe have persona like Kurt Angle as a heel with cockiness and outstanding in-ring skill. Do his signature flip and talk trash on the inferior skill of his opponents. The only way Gable should lose in pro wrestling is when he is hit by a chair or a one against many scrap. Take some acting and improve classes for a year and he'd do well.

If Soros spends $1M per DA race, will he spend the same for 10K bots annually on twitter to manipulate votes and social opinion?

Sir, this is a Jimmy.

I believe the exact opposite of what you are saying. You save lives by protecting the innocent. FWIW: If you want to find a serial killer, here is a map across the United States. https://prochoice.org/patients/find-a-provider/

I asked questions about the whether the contextual motivation for homicide was justified for self-defense/health, finance, relationships, and circumstance. Here are your answers applied to similar questions within the largest context of homicide in the United States. Self-defense / Health concern: Sometimes, a pregnancy can pose serious health risks to the mother or the unborn. In these cases, should a woman legally be able to choose to pay for unborn homicide to protect her own health? A: No A: Is this a joke? A: Homicide is a neutral term for killing another person. A: It is not and should not be legal to murder someone for what you think they might do. Financial concerns: Pregnancy and childbirth can be expensive, and some women may not have the financial resources to support a child. In these cases, should a woman legally be able to choose to pay for homicide to avoid the financial burden of raising a child? A: Don't put yourself into the situation of danger to begin with. A: This is the power reserved for the government. A: Yes if people are destined to be a burden on society. A: Only parents that identify as mother can decide. A: Only after a final selection on gender has been decided. A: What is a mother? Define it. A: Abandonment is an option. A: Make the other parent take care of the child. A: Cut 'em loose. Move. Out of sight, out of mind. A: White people draw a premium. A: Buy American. Relationship issues: Pregnancy can put a strain on relationships, and some women may feel that they are not in a stable or supportive enough relationship to have a child. In these cases, should a woman legally be able to choose to pay for homicide to avoid the emotional and financial strain of raising a child alone? A: Killing and divorcing ('adopting out') have the same result for you. You will lose your friends either way, choose divorce. Personal circumstances: There are many other personal circumstances that might lead a pregnant mother to pay for an unborn homicide, such as being too young or too old to have a child, not feeling ready to be a parent, or simply not wanting to have a child at this time in their life. Should this be legal? A: If you're not the one doing the killing, I think that's OK. But remember I'm not a lawyer. I do think that you should take a hard look at the human trafficking angle. Just because you don't have a use for them doesn't mean they're useless. The Guttmacher Institute documents that over 800,000 unborn people are killed annually through the medical procedure known as an abortion. On one hand, a large block of the population agrees with this statement: People are spending countless effort and funds to find reasons to flip the supreme court. They are going after Justice Thomas, a real-life hero that indirectly saved tens of thousands of lives by allowing state law to decide how to handle abortion.

Please recognize the decision to pay someone for homicide is a deeply personal one, and it should be made based on the individual circumstances and beliefs of the person involved. While some people may disagree with the choice to arrange for homicide, it is important to respect the autonomy and agency of people to make decisions about what is best for them.

Question #4 Should it be legal to pay someone to commit a homicide of one's parents/children/pets, due to one's personal circumstances of being too young or too old to have responsibility, not feeling ready to have responsibility, or simply not wanting to have responsibility at this time in their life?

Question #3 Getting married could put a strain on one's friend relationships, and some people may feel that they are not in a stable or supportive enough friend relationship to support a spousal relationship. In these cases, may one choose potential spouse homicide as a way to avoid the friendship strain?

If I don't want my kids, can I adopt them out in case my spouse is also not interested? What about my aging mother?

My biological daughter, who goes by she/her/hers, and is tom boyish, was costing me $10K annually for gymnastics before finding other sports. Now her car insurance is costing me $3K annually on top of the car purchase. Soon, she will go to college and cost over $10K annually again. I have two other children in competitive sports. My wife has not worked in 13 years. Since my company was acquired, I've been working all hours of the day for all days of the week. I cannot quit my job without having another job lined up. I work to pay for these other four people living in my house. Just want to know what my options are and what choices I have.

Question #2 Food, Shelter, Health, Transport, Education, and Entertainment can be expensive. Family providers may be concerned that they do not have the financial resources to support their family members. In this case of concern, should the provider have the legal right to choose to homicide their family to avoid the financial burden?

What makes homicide for self-defense murder? I feel very threatened and reasonable believe that drunk drivers on the road are going to harm me, just like they did my aunt, great-grandmother, and my friend's sister.

About 30% of all traffic crash fatalities in the United States involve drunk drivers (with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher). In 2020, there were 11,654 people killed in these preventable crashes. In every state, it’s illegal to drive drunk, yet one person was killed in a drunk-driving crash every 45 minutes in the United States in 2020. https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/drunk-driving Kansas finally has something to brag about on a wrestling forum. https://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/States/StatesAlcohol.aspx

The purpose of this post is to explore context and nuances of homicide. The questions are Jimmy Whelcher style and they will be sewn together in the end for relevancy to some non wrestling topics in this forum. Interesting. A person who kills another person in self-defense may not be charged with homicide. In order to claim self-defense, a person must reasonably believe that they are in immediate danger of being harmed and that the use of deadly force is necessary to protect themselves. Drinking and driving can pose serious health risks to other drivers on the road. Is or should it be legal to homicide a person leaving the bar drunk when they start up their car to drive to their next place?

Don't lose during the season and the unspoken rule to have good character.

I'm in a metal mood. Will you help me build a metal playlist?

Just imagine how one could sway behaviors and beliefs for one’s ideology… Wait… too late.

What information could Elon or Zuckerberg sell about me, and how will it impact me? Maybe I should take that more serious. Is that a bigger threat than control over what content and culture is pushed to me and mine?

Since everyone is in agreement that Tik Tok is a huge threat to America given the power to control what you see and how you see it, to make you believe things that are not true... maybe... the 50% will understand why Twitter is better and the 100% will wake up to what is wrong with the Media, AI Chats, Facebook and Google.

The issue at hand is not just a matter of revenue competition. It's not solely about the potential for China to exploit their access to the same insights as the USA, which includes texts, photos, videos, likes, membership information, and search history. The greatest risk and concern lies in who has control over the social media platforms that shape the opinions of today's youth, who will ultimately become the leaders of tomorrow.

Thank you twitter