jross

“Dangerous freedom is preferred over peaceful slavery.” It shouldn't be the responsibility of corporations or governments to control the flow of information. It is better to let people have open access to diverse information sources, to collaborate, and to make their own choices about what to believe.

Why don't you do the research and come back? You keep posting bullshit based on bullshit. After you've done the exercise, perhaps everyone will learn how to post less bullshit.

Your speech is an example of media spin. RV the Journalist: "Anybody that says anything bad about Trump has an anti-GOP agenda." Problem: over generalization, bias, lack of nuance, misleading... RV just made this shit up.

This same shit occurs on a variety of topics, celebrities, politicians, etc. Your choice: pick the OP instructions to raise your IQ or leverage this list to thicken your bubble.

Fact Check: They go back to 2018... Finding: True. It is also true that Walz has been criticized by his NG peers for stolen valor since at least 2006.

A critical thinker should apply the same process to social media posts as they do with news media. Copy/pasting what your expert has told you to think is a sign... bubbles This lady is LOW IQ... unaware she is regurgitating shit why claiming others are shit.

Yes, even Reuters with their policy of taking a "value-neutral approach"... 8/13: "Rambling Trump, Musk interview marred by tech issues" Problem: bias and subjectivity in article title word choice, and the title misleads on the article content Problem: article has bias in the coverage of Harris, selective framing, lack of nuance... Reuters normally does a good job... but not always. Same with the AP.

Experts like this? The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview Donald Trump tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?”

The best thing about X.com is better access to the primary source in raw form via video. Rather than blindly believing the media spin, you can listen and form your own opinion. And then you have community notes.

PBS Article Review: Source: An article highlighted by @RockLobster as one of the reputable sources debunking the claim that Tim Walz retired after learning of his deployment. The article, titled “Fact-checking attacks on Walz’s military record by Vance and other Republicans,” originally appeared on PolitiFact. Issue: The fact-check labels the claim as “mostly false,” but a closer examination of the evidence suggests it is “mostly true.” Key Points: Awareness of Deployment: The press release indicates that Walz was aware of the potential for deployment. Communication with Unit: Walz informed his unit that deployment was highly likely. Commitment to Duty: The press release also emphasizes Walz’s commitment to his unit, even if deployed to Iraq. Retirement Circumstances: Walz circumvented his superior to secure retirement before completing his intended service. Concerns About Perception: Walz questioned a unit member, asking if soldiers would view him negatively for not deploying, potentially seeing it as an attempt to avoid deployment. Unit’s Reaction: Multiple members of Walz’s unit criticized his character and actions.

Even when the articles report "just the facts"... the article title, article choice, and fact selection is problematic. 8/13: Fox News: Front page article title: "Harris responds after Trump unleashes a scathing attack, branding her a 'radical-left lunatic'" Problem: Emotionally loaded language, sensational, lack context Neutral Title: "Harris responds to Trump's criticism." 8/13: CNN: Front page article title: "A CNN investigation shows that a startup connected to JD Vance failed as a business and provided a ‘nightmare’ work environment for employees" Problem: implied bias - a very negative portrayal right from the start, loaded language, lack of specificity Neutral Title: “CNN Investigation: JD Vance-Backed AppHarvest Startup Company Faces Business Challenges and Employee Complaints”

A critical thinker can go to any major news site and immediately find false information plus bias across multiple articles. My kids didn't believe me but they can also do it. Fox News is the most obvious but ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc. all have problems. Who benefits? What language and framing is used? What stories are reported and important, not reported? What information in the story is omitted? How much opinion, anonymous source, and speculation is included? Are you reading someone's slanted interpretation or evidence-based facts and drawing your own conclusion? What is the background and history behind a story that can provide a deeper understanding and prevent misinterpretation? To think critically: Ask Questions: Who, what, why, when, and how? Evaluate Sources: Check credibility and biases. Analyze Evidence: Is it relevant, sufficient, and strong? Consider Perspectives: Explore and be open to different viewpoints. Use Logic: Ensure arguments are consistent and avoid fallacies. Reflect: Consider implications and stay open-minded. ----------- Feel free to added tips on thinking critically. Feel free to point out and discuss problems in specific news articles.

@RockLobster I'm using articles and unit member comments to fact check this statement "...One of the many reputable sites where the claim that Walz retired after learning of deployment was debunked:"

The press release says his unit could be mobilized, and that Walz will continue his service. This was supported by his superior that he had indicated he would continue. He changed his mind and retired after the press release.

The PBS article mentions the Press Release. The Press Release confirms at he was aware his unit might be deployed and he would continue his NG responsibility. Later that month he 'retired' early by going around his superior. @RockLobster

@RockLobster - if you were able to accomplish big things and had sound policies, I'd vote for you regardless of your character.

Adding some context that there was criticism before praise. May 25: (Monday) George Floyd dies. May 26: Protests and riots begin in Minnesota. May 27: Protests intensify, with more looting and property damage in Minneapolis. May 28: (Thursday) Despite Governor Walz activating ~500 National Guard, the 3rd Precinct is burned down by rioters. Trump implicitly criticizes Governor Walz and explicitly Mayor Frey, calling them weak and threatening to send in the Guard if the situation doesn't improve. May 29th: (Friday) May 30: The increased and fully mobilized National Guard presence begins to calm things down, but tensions are still high. Trump is still critical. May 31: Multiple tweets about Law and Order, congrats to the National Guard, it shouldn't have taken so long, but Great Job. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/tweets-may-31-2020 (note: timestamps do not show for local time zone)

The comment has red flags: It engages in Monday morning quarterbacking by referencing an article published after my original comment. It dismisses the CNN video showcasing simply because it was visible on Twitter. It overlooks the broader issue, including Walz's lies and criticism from bad blood with multiple people who served with him. While there is support from his peers Al Bonnifield --- "“He was asking what would be best for the soldiers,” Bonnifield recalled. “His feeling was, where can I do best for my soldiers? He thought he could do more in Congress than he could do if he stayed with the unit. He went on for half an hour or more, talking to us, trying to figure out what to do.” Jeff Bertrang, outranked Tim (link) --- "Tim had a go-get-em attitude." Joseph Eustice, served under Tim (link) --- "He was a great soldier,” Eustice said. “When he chose to leave, he had every right to leave." Who has called out Tim Walz? His peers... Doug Julin, Sgt. Maj. -- Tim Walz's military superior -- Would have likely said no to his retirement request if not backdoored due to the timing. Was completely caught off guard that Walz was retiring after Walz had already confirmed he was staying after notified of potential deployment in March. Thomas Behrends, Command Sergeant Major -- Tim's replacement (link) --- "He quit earlier than he was supposed to after he was aware his unit would be deployed." "Coward" "Traitor" "Deserter" Paul Herr, Command Sergeant Major -- Tim's unit (link) --- "He's used the rank that he never achieved in order to advance his political career" "He quit" John Kolb, Lieutenant Colonel -- Unit's battalion commander (link) "I do not regret that Tim retired early" Tom Schilling, Vet -- Tim's unit (link) --- "Its a character thing" "Stolen Valor" Corey Bjertness, Captain -- Tim's unit chaplain (link) --- "Coward" Kathy Miller, Mother of Kyle Miller - Tim's unit member killed in Iraq (link) --- "Coward" Additional callouts from peers Tom Hagen, Minnesota National Guard (Judge Advocate) and War Vet (link) --- "Lie by omission" (from 2006) David Thul, War Vet (link) --- "Federal crime for stolen valor" (from 2009) Questionable behavior Implying combat experience with his words: "We can make sure that those weapons of war that I carried in war is the only place where those weapons are at." Tim Walz Implying combat experience by holding a sign proclaiming: "Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry" (https://i.ibb.co/qxmZC3N/image.png) - Tim Walz Press Release on March 20, 2005: "Walz Still Planning to Run for Congress Despite Possible Call to Duty in Iraq -- "As Command Sergeant Major I have a responsibility not only to ready my battalion for Iraq, but also to serve if called on. I am dedicated to serving my country to the best of my ability, whether that is in Washington DC or in Iraq." (https://i.ibb.co/C2qjg5Y/image.png) - Tim Walz How he misused his rank for politics “fast and loose” with his word choices at times in describing his service.

What is the full story? When did Trump say it and why? What was Trump saying before about leadership and governor response?

All across the USA, young competitive gymnast girls practice 20 hours weekly during school, and 25-30 hours weekly during the summer. The best have options to home school and train more with the best coaches. In wrestling, competitive youth practice 3-5 hours a week. One has to actively seek out and has a hard time finding good coaching and practice opportunities.

Oof. (listen to the word exchange in the video)

To Never Trumpers. Why do people with questionable character argue that strong character is more important than the immediate benefits of sound policies? The rhetoric from some 'Never Trumpers' often reveals character flaws that are arguably worse than those of Trump.

People like Trump and Rock Lobster can gain support if their policies, leadership, and benefits to voters outweigh their character flaws.

Who was talking in the video? What relationship was he to Tim Walz? What did he say? Tell me you didn't watch the video without telling me you didn't watch the video... "Twitter man says!" Why would I listen to what Twitter man says when I can listen to the source, do my own thinking, and form my own opinion?