Wrestleknownothing

Mendez has that dog, but did he bite before the clock expired?

Mendez wanted to go upper soooo bad

Will Bartlett open up like he said? He did shoot right away.

Questionable strategy. Down a point, no riding time, and Bailey picks neutral

Nope. But he does have a ; tatoo

Sure looked like, but the weight stays still, unlike Ghadiali

You are up 2-0 I have you right where I want you.

@flyingcement this is where I start my comeback

Ghadiali was better on his feet, on top, and on bottom. He was better shooting and defending. But it was close otherwise.

Ghadiali saw that shot coming from a mile away. No set up, just dive.

Or on top apparently

Ghadiali looking real solid. And fast.

Hmm. Feldman takes neutral to start 2nd. Not too confident on bottom?

@flyingcement you are up 1-0

What a scramble

I finally figured out which celebrity Stephen Little looks like

No it wouldn't. The bonds aren't created because Social Security has a demand for them. The bonds are created because the government needs to borrow money. SS is a captive lender. Invest SS in equities instead and the government will just need to auction more public securities. And how exactly would an "increased funds" be diverted? It would be against every law and every principal of retirement investing.

You are complaining about a decision that was made 89 years ago. Not even remotely the kind of thing the Dept of Gov Efficiency is said to be targeting.

Not in person. Watching on Flo.

Good man

I already typed my thoughts accurately.

What does one have to do with the other? How social security is invested has nothing to do with government waste. Social Security, by law, can only invest in federal debt securities (treasuries and social security specific forms of treasuries). Waste. No waste. It does not change how The Social Security Trust Fund is invested. Hell, if SS were to be allowed to invest in stocks imagine the idiotic political campaigns we would have to listen t. "Politician XYZ wants to take your hard earned retirement money away from you and GAMBLE it on Wall Street." That is an actual ad I listened to over and over again this election cycle.

Your paraphrasing ranges from poor to completely inaccurate.

I had not heard of this before. I took a quick peek at the website and it was intriguing. I will have to spend a little time deep diving/belly-flopping.

It's just a shame that we are going to lose so many posters on this message board. With working 80+ hours at their volunteer positions there just won't be any time for this tomfoolery. And I know you guys will heed the call, right?