Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Webster goes down to Shapiro (who enters the list).  Robideau goes down to Taylor.  

125

9/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (6-0)
12/14/14 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/16/28 Kysen Terukina (4-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (7-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (8-0)
3/3/3 Evan Frost (8-0)
6/10/7 Marcus Blaze (8-0)
16/9/17 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/1/1 Jesse Mendez (8-0)
2/2/2 Sergio Vega (7-0)
4/4/4 Anthony Echemendia (8-0)
5/5/6 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (8-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/1/1 Ty Watters (10-0)
2/NR/NR Meyer Shapiro (1-0)

3/4/5 Brandon Cannon (8-0)
9/10/10 Jude Swisher (5-0)
11/8/11 PJ Duke (7-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (8-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (7-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (4-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)
5/4/4 Rocco Welsh (5-0)
197
1/NR/NR Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/1 Rocky Elam (8-0)
3/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (9-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (3-0)
5/6/7 Nathan Taylor (2-0)

Edited by flyingcement
Posted

Frost falls to Davino and Echemendia falls to Mendez.

125

9/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (6-0)
12/14/14 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/16/28 Kysen Terukina (4-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (7-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (8-0)
6/10/7 Marcus Blaze (8-0)
16/9/17 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/1/1 Jesse Mendez (8-0)
2/2/2 Sergio Vega (7-0)
5/5/6 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (8-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/1/1 Ty Watters (10-0)
2/NR/NR Meyer Shapiro (1-0)

3/4/5 Brandon Cannon (8-0)
9/10/10 Jude Swisher (5-0)
11/8/11 PJ Duke (7-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (8-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (7-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (4-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)
5/4/4 Rocco Welsh (5-0)
197
1/NR/NR Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/1 Rocky Elam (8-0)
3/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (9-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (3-0)
5/6/7 Nathan Taylor (2-0)

Posted

Yonger defeats Taylor 

125
9/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (6-0)
12/14/14 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/16/28 Kysen Terukina (4-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (7-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (8-0)
6/10/7 Marcus Blaze (8-0)
16/9/17 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/1/1 Jesse Mendez (8-0)
2/2/2 Sergio Vega (7-0)
5/5/6 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (8-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/1/1 Ty Watters (10-0)
2/NR/NR Meyer Shapiro (1-0)

3/4/5 Brandon Cannon (8-0)
9/10/10 Jude Swisher (5-0)
11/8/11 PJ Duke (7-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (8-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (7-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (4-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)
5/4/4 Rocco Welsh (5-0)
197
1/NR/NR Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/1 Rocky Elam (8-0)
3/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (9-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (3-0)
 

Posted
1 hour ago, flyingcement said:

Yonger defeats Taylor 

125
9/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (6-0)
12/14/14 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/16/28 Kysen Terukina (4-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (7-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (8-0)
6/10/7 Marcus Blaze (8-0)
16/9/17 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/1/1 Jesse Mendez (8-0)
2/2/2 Sergio Vega (7-0)
5/5/6 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (8-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/1/1 Ty Watters (10-0)
2/NR/NR Meyer Shapiro (1-0)

3/4/5 Brandon Cannon (8-0)
9/10/10 Jude Swisher (5-0)
11/8/11 PJ Duke (7-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (8-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (7-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (4-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)
5/4/4 Rocco Welsh (5-0)
197
1/NR/NR Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/1 Rocky Elam (8-0)
3/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (9-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (3-0)
 

Going into NCAA's prediction


125: Nobody
133: Blaze
141: Vega, Mendez
149: SVN
157: Watters, Shapiro I think PJ drops one either in a dual or big 10's not saying he wont win NCAA's
165: MM, Caliendo gets Dee in the dual
174: Levi Ruiz loses to Singleton
184: Nobody Ferrari loses to Max at some point
197: Barr, Elam
285: Yonger, Trumble

I am the personal property of VakAttack

Posted

Looks like there is a refusal to include Luke Lilledahl.  He is undefeated. As others have pointed out, losses to teammates and losses at the All Star match do not count according the NCAA.   You can't just make up your own rules.

Same with Nic Bouzakis

Posted
16 minutes ago, SocraTease said:

Looks like there is a refusal to include Luke Lilledahl.  He is undefeated. As others have pointed out, losses to teammates and losses at the All Star match do not count according the NCAA.   You can't just make up your own rules.

Same with Nic Bouzakis

Should the people that lost to high schoolers also be included then? jaxon joy, brandon cannon, Dj McGee, etc

Posted
Quote
2 hours ago, Truzzcat said:

Going into NCAA's prediction


125: Nobody
133: Blaze
141: Vega, Mendez
149: SVN
157: Watters, Shapiro I think PJ drops one either in a dual or big 10's not saying he wont win NCAA's
165: MM, Caliendo gets Dee in the dual
174: Levi Ruiz loses to Singleton
184: Nobody Ferrari loses to Max at some point
197: Barr, Elam
285: Yonger, Trumble

 

What about Byrd?

Posted
1 hour ago, SocraTease said:

Looks like there is a refusal to include Luke Lilledahl.  He is undefeated. As others have pointed out, losses to teammates and losses at the All Star match do not count according the NCAA.   You can't just make up your own rules.

Same with Nic Bouzakis

When you create a thread on a wrestling forum you can create whatever rules you want.  If others dont like it they can pound sand. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Truzzcat said:

Going into NCAA's prediction


125: Nobody
133: Blaze
141: Vega, Mendez
149: SVN
157: Watters, Shapiro I think PJ drops one either in a dual or big 10's not saying he wont win NCAA's
165: MM, Caliendo gets Dee in the dual
174: Levi Ruiz loses to Singleton
184: Nobody Ferrari loses to Max at some point
197: Barr, Elam
285: Yonger, Trumble

🧠

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingcement said:

When you create a thread on a wrestling forum you can create whatever rules you want.  If others dont like it they can pound sand. 

Ok, then. I think I will start a new thread: "Little Rock is wrestling Slippery Rock" this weekend on a mat made of Flying Cement. The winner will be determined by which team pounds the stubborn Cement into sand the quickest.  And the "quick sand" will slowly sink the nonsensical Intermat threads that don't rely on facts, evidence, or reason.    It's America, right, you can espouse whatever you want in a post-truth world as long as you believe it and "like" it, right?  

Hand-reaching-out-of-the-sand-1200x901.thumb.webp.3a6abb4bd3eda99485ddc61852b4fb14.webp

Posted
3 hours ago, flyingcement said:

When you create a thread on a wrestling forum you can create whatever rules you want.  If others dont like it they can pound sand. 

I hate when my team's starter LOSES and some IDIOT thinks that's a LOSS!! Everyone must pretend with me that it's not real!!!! 😡 

Posted
10 hours ago, SocraTease said:

you can espouse whatever you want in a post-truth world

That seems to be the case way down in the 'NWT' part of this BBS. Does the outrage ring the same...

 

.

Posted
11 hours ago, SocraTease said:

Ok, then. I think I will start a new thread: "Little Rock is wrestling Slippery Rock" this weekend on a mat made of Flying Cement. The winner will be determined by which team pounds the stubborn Cement into sand the quickest.  And the "quick sand" will slowly sink the nonsensical Intermat threads that don't rely on facts, evidence, or reason.    It's America, right, you can espouse whatever you want in a post-truth world as long as you believe it and "like" it, right?  

Hand-reaching-out-of-the-sand-1200x901.thumb.webp.3a6abb4bd3eda99485ddc61852b4fb14.webp

 

I heard a guy who claimed to speak "my truth". I always thought the truth was the truth, but he claimed his own version of it.

Posted
15 hours ago, flyingcement said:

When you create a thread on a wrestling forum you can create whatever rules you want.  If others dont like it they can pound sand. 

Sorta like the "rankers".

Posted
3 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

Sheldon Seymour has a viable path to enter NCAA's undefeated.

has a couple solid guys (like Marc Anthony McGowan + Cornell + Penn)

but there's a decent chance. 

👍

 

4 hours ago, MPhillips said:

This...:classic_dry:

🧠

Posted (edited)

Colton Washleski defeats Jude Swisher.  Wrestlestat rankings and records have been updated.  Intermat and Flo rankings will be updated when they are available.

125
8/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (8-0)*
11/14/14 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/16/28 Kysen Terukina (6-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (9-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (13-0)
3/10/7 Marcus Blaze (10-0)
18/9/17 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/2/2 Sergio Vega (8-0)
2/1/1 Jesse Mendez (10-0)

6/5/6 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (10-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/NR/NR Meyer Shapiro (2-0)
2/4/5 Brandon Cannon (10-0)
3/1/1 Ty Watters (10-0)

6/8/11 PJ Duke (9-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (10-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (8-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (6-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/4/4 Rocco Welsh (9-0)

5/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)*
197
1/NR/NR Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/1 Rocky Elam (8-0)
4/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (11-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (6-0)

*Lost in the all-star classic exhibition

Edited by flyingcement
Posted (edited)
On 12/21/2025 at 2:48 PM, Owen Rector said:

Evan Frost and Echemendia were just eliminated

Mendez isn't losing to anybody this year, it was just Echemendia's turn to take an "L".  Well, put a thumb tack in that one, I forgot about Vega. 

Edited by NM1965
Posted
13 hours ago, flyingcement said:

Colton Washleski defeats Jude Swisher.  Wrestlestat rankings and records have been updated.  Intermat and Flo rankings will be updated when they are available.

125
8/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (8-0)*
11/14/14 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/16/28 Kysen Terukina (6-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (9-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (13-0)
3/10/7 Marcus Blaze (10-0)
18/9/17 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/2/2 Sergio Vega (8-0)
2/1/1 Jesse Mendez (10-0)

6/5/6 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (10-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/NR/NR Meyer Shapiro (2-0)
2/4/5 Brandon Cannon (10-0)
3/1/1 Ty Watters (10-0)

6/8/11 PJ Duke (9-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (10-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (8-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (6-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/4/4 Rocco Welsh (9-0)

5/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)*
197
1/NR/NR Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/1 Rocky Elam (8-0)
4/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (11-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (6-0)

*Lost in the all-star classic exhibition

Why is Joy not included but Cannon is? They have the same unofficial loss to a HSer. 

Also thanks for keeping track of this

Posted
6 hours ago, wrestlingfan22 said:

Why is Joy not included but Cannon is? They have the same unofficial loss to a HSer. 

Also thanks for keeping track of this

You are correct! That was my miss.  I have removed Cannon and also updated the Intermat (2nd below) and Flo (3rd) which have become available.

125
8/5/4 Sheldon Seymour (8-0)*
11/12/12 Jacob Moran (9-0)
22/13/19 Kysen Terukina (6-0) 
133:
1/1/1 Lucas Byrd (9-0)
2/2/2 Ben Davino (13-0)
3/5/6 Marcus Blaze (10-0)
18/9/16 Dominick Serrano (1-0)
141
1/2/2 Sergio Vega (8-0)
2/1/1 Jesse Mendez (10-0)

6/6/7 Joey Olivieri (9-0)
149
1/1/1 Shayne Van Ness (10-0)
5/4/8 Cross Wasilewski (10-0)
157
1/7/6 Meyer Shapiro (2-0)
3/1/2 Ty Watters (10-0)

6/4/3 PJ Duke (9-0)
165
1/1/1 Mitchell Mesenbrink (10-0)
2/2/2 Ladarion Lockett (8-0)
4/4/4 Joey Blaze (10-0)
5/5/6 Matt Bianchi (6-0)
174
1/1/1 Levi Haines (8-0)
5/2/2 Simon Ruiz (2-0)
184
1/1/1 Angelo Ferrari (8-0)
4/4/4 Rocco Welsh (9-0)

5/5/5 Jaxon Smith (5-0)*
197
1/1/1 Josh Barr (2-0)
2/1/2 Rocky Elam (8-0)
4/3/3 Stephen Little (4-0)
285
1/1/1 Yonger Bastida (11-0)
2/2/2 Isaac Trumble (6-0)

*Lost in the all-star classic exhibition

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...