Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

She’s already selling books before she retires lol

of the yalls who bashed Fox for lying this week.  How many of the lefties here will say msnbc and Rachel maddow sure are shading the truth.  I’ll bet 0 of y’all will 

Edited by Caveira
Posted
13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

She’s already selling books before she retires lol

of the yalls who bashed Fox for lying this week.  How many of the lefties here will say msnbc and Rachel maddow sure are shading the truth.  I’ll bet 0 of y’all will 

Is it true the book is titled:  Kamala Salad.

  • Bob 1

.

Posted

 

What is your claim? Maybe I can address it. 
Just to get ahead of it. If your claim is that it wasn't the closest presidential election in the 21st century. It was(1.47% difference, side note; how can any election be considered a landslide if you win less than 50% of the popular vote? But I digress). Go back and look at the numbers. Next closest was in 2000 at .5% difference. But then again that wasn't in the 21st century. Seeing as how that moron put it in quotations, I assume that is the claim and they are absolutely wrong. But glad you took the time to post your support.  
If you have contrary information please present it? 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, headshuck said:

Rachel Maddow dropping her head was quickly clipped. It probably hit the desk.
 

2000 (not technically 21st century)   Bush 271 Gore 266  and this after SCOTUS involvement

2004   Bush 286   Kerry  251    Closer than 2024 election

2008  Obama 365   McCain  173

2012   Obama  332  Romney  206

2016   Trump  304   clinton  227    Closer than 2024 election

2020   Biden  306    Trump  232   Closer than 2024 election

2024   Trump 312   Harris  226     4th closest election in the 21st century

And there you have it.   Kamala still can't tell the truth when the facts are staring her in the face.  In fact she got the least electoral votes of 2 of the other losers.   So not even close to being the closest race in the 21st century.   Even when Trump lost he got more electoral votes than Kamala.   

mspart

Posted
2 minutes ago, mspart said:

2000 (not technically 21st century)   Bush 271 Gore 266  and this after SCOTUS involvement

2004   Bush 286   Kerry  251    Closer than 2024 election

2008  Obama 365   McCain  173

2012   Obama  332  Romney  206

2016   Trump  304   clinton  227    Closer than 2024 election

2020   Biden  306    Trump  232   Closer than 2024 election

2024   Trump 312   Harris  226     4th closest election in the 21st century

And there you have it.   Kamala still can't tell the truth when the facts are staring her in the face.  In fact she got the least electoral votes of 2 of the other losers.   So not even close to being the closest race in the 21st century.   Even when Trump lost he got more electoral votes than Kamala.   

mspart

Exactly...the goal isn't to get more popular votes.  To talk about how close the popular vote was is a losers mentality.

Posted
5 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

 

What is your claim? Maybe I can address it. 
Just to get ahead of it. If your claim is that it wasn't the closest presidential election in the 21st century. It was(1.47% difference, side note; how can any election be considered a landslide if you win less than 50% of the popular vote? But I digress). Go back and look at the numbers. Next closest was in 2000 at .5% difference. But then again that wasn't in the 21st century. Seeing as how that moron put it in quotations, I assume that is the claim and they are absolutely wrong. But glad you took the time to post your support.  
If you have contrary information please present it? 

 

Maybe the Democrats will learn one day that you don't win or lose an election with the popular vote. It has been the electoral votes that count and only the electoral votes. Trump won by 86 electoral votes. 312 t0 226. Right around a 16 Percent win.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Maybe the Democrats will learn one day that you don't win or lose an election with the popular vote. It has been the electoral votes that count and only the electoral votes. Trump won by 86 electoral votes. 312 t0 226. Right around a 16 Percent win.

The electoral college AND Senate BOTH need to be abolished. They're both crap and undermine principles of a representative democracy. I'd gut both of them with impunity. 

  • Haha 1

Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy

Posted
Just now, red viking said:

The electoral college AND Senate BOTH need to be abolished. They're both crap and undermine principles of a representative democracy. I'd gut both of them with impunity. 

Good thing pro terrorist anti American people aren’t in charge boss. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, red viking said:

The electoral college AND Senate BOTH need to be abolished. They're both crap and undermine principles of a representative democracy. I'd gut both of them with impunity. 

You sound like someone who just fell out of a coconut tree.

Posted

It’s sort of like watching a baseball game.  The Jumbotron lists a rare scoped fact to tell a narrative.  On Tuesday nights, against left handed pitchers, in the sixth inning, when batting eighth in the lineup, Jonny is batting .294.

Meanwhile his season average is 0.193.

Posted
It’s sort of like watching a baseball game.  The Jumbotron lists a rare scoped fact to tell a narrative.  On Tuesday nights, against left handed pitchers, in the sixth inning, when batting eighth in the lineup, Jonny is batting .294.
Meanwhile his season average is 0.193.

Did you unwittingly share an unposted Tripnsweep narrative?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...