Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Hammerlock3 said:

my former cope was that sasso got shot while purchasing, which isn't great but i wouldn't have minded...pretty obvious he's closer to the wrong side of the deal. 

Other than deep cynicism, what would prompt you to think that?  Is there something obvious I'm missing?  Because otherwise it seems like this second incident could easily be explained as a reaction to the first incident (guns for protection, THC vapes for PTSD).  The administrative error of not having the car registered just compounding it all.  But I would prefer to give more benefit of the doubt than what you have done - unless we know something more about it than what was reported.  

Posted
9 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

Other than deep cynicism, what would prompt you to think that?  Is there something obvious I'm missing?  Because otherwise it seems like this second incident could easily be explained as a reaction to the first incident (guns for protection, THC vapes for PTSD).  The administrative error of not having the car registered just compounding it all.  But I would prefer to give more benefit of the doubt than what you have done - unless we know something more about it than what was reported.  

The whole shooting thing was never really explained as far as I could tell.  Leaves folks to wonder.  

.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, ionel said:

The whole shooting thing was never really explained as far as I could tell.  Leaves folks to wonder.  

Wondering is one thing, but to state that [something] is obvious is different to me.  

Edited by flyingcement

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...