Trump Admin Arrests Judge

[ionel]

41 minutes ago, JimmyCinnabon said:

Was Donald J. Trump convicted of 34 felonies or not?

No

[JimmyCinnabon]

5 minutes ago, ionel said:

No

The MAGA cult is absolutely something else. It is truly incredible the lengths of disagreeing with reality that you will go to in order to convince yourself that your cult leader isn't a convicted felon. If I did not interact with you people myself I wouldn't believe you even exist out there in the world.

Edited 3 hours ago by JimmyCinnabon

[WrestlingRasta]

Technically it was only three, for a total of 34 times.   But whatever makes everyone feel better.

Edited 3 hours ago by WrestlingRasta

[JimmyCinnabon]

6 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Technically it was only three, for a total of 34 times.   But whatever makes everyone feel better.

A distinction without a difference if you will. Thirty four felony convictions I guess. 

Edited 3 hours ago by JimmyCinnabon

[D3 for LU]

It looks like it's time again to bump that particular thread of mine...

D3

[jross]

Prosecutors found unused laws to inflate payments nobody cared about, which could’ve been a minor misdemeanor, into 34 felonies.  A flimsy case of political targeting... reeking of desperation.  Don't take my word for, take a critic's reasonable view.

https://reason.com/2024/05/03/the-new-york-case-against-trump-relies-on-a-twisty-legal-theory-that-reeks-of-desperation/

[Paul158]

2 hours ago, JimmyCinnabon said:

They're going to study the MAGA cult for decades to come, if our civilization is even still around. 

Hey JimmyC . I was wondering if you could tell us 3 things (ABOUT) Joe Biden that made you vote for him. Then could you tell us 3 things (ABOUT) Kamala that made you vote for her. Thanks.

[Paul158]

1 hour ago, D3 for LU said:

It looks like it's time again to bump that particular thread of mine...

D3

I really think we need DR. Phil for this situation.

[red viking]

43 minutes ago, jross said:

Prosecutors found unused laws to inflate payments nobody cared about, which could’ve been a minor misdemeanor, into 34 felonies.  A flimsy case of political targeting... reeking of desperation.  Don't take my word for, take a critic's reasonable view.

https://reason.com/2024/05/03/the-new-york-case-against-trump-relies-on-a-twisty-legal-theory-that-reeks-of-desperation/

It's funny. Wingers didn't have a huge problem w judges until they started ruling on trumps blatant violations of he law. Now, the judges must all be activists and/or corrupt. Just like the entire media and basically all scientists and people w PhDs. 

Instead of Trump simply being a bad guy that constantly lies they go with the grand conspiracy theory that basically ALL intellectual authorities that point out the obvious must be corrupt. 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by red viking

[WrestlingRasta]

41 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Hey JimmyC . I was wondering if you could tell us 3 things (ABOUT) Joe Biden that made you vote for him. Then could you tell us 3 things (ABOUT) Kamala that made you vote for her. Thanks.

@Caveira Is this where something something DS factors in?  Or does it not fit our feelings?  Or does the fact you had interjected him way early in this thread cancel it out?  
 

Just curious. 

[mspart]

So the thread was about arresting a judge.   The reason was because the judge assisted in the escape of a known illegal immigrant that was under arrest for abuse while under trial for said abuse.   That is against the law.   She should be arrested.   That is the thread topic. 

mspart

[WrestlingRasta]

Which brings up another entertaining note, when it is expected to stay strictly on the very specific situation in the thread topic, and when it is okay to bring in other situations, and/or people who have nothing to do with a started topic.  
 

Consistency is not exactly at a very high level around here. In this thread alone we have how we shouldn’t trust the govt or media….unless of course those warm fuzzy feelings catch us then we just run with it. 
 

When mentioning someone who’s not of the subject is something something DS, unless of course those warm fuzzy feelings lead us to do it ourselves earlier in the same thread. 
 

And now of course topics should stay specifically on topic, unless…well…feelings. 
 

Good stuff, now that the wrestling is over I hope you all enjoy hockey night!! Caps and Canadiens last night was fire!’

Edited 1 hour ago by WrestlingRasta

[Caveira]

18 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

@Caveira Is this where something something DS factors in?  Or does it not fit our feelings?  Or does the fact you had interjected him way early in this thread cancel it out?  
 

Just curious. 

I don’t know what DS is 

[red viking]

15 minutes ago, mspart said:

So the thread was about arresting a judge.   The reason was because the judge assisted in the escape of a known illegal immigrant that was under arrest for abuse while under trial for said abuse.   That is against the law.   She should be arrested.   That is the thread topic. 

mspart

So if I heard through the grapevine (,i never viewed or heard an explicit order) that ICE wanted to arrest a guy and I allowed him to hang out at my place, is that illegal? 

[ionel]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

So if I heard through the grapevine (,i never viewed or heard an explicit order) that ICE wanted to arrest a guy and I allowed him to hang out at my place, is that illegal? 

Assume not illegal since we all presume you live in China.   

Edited 15 minutes ago by ionel