Is this true? Liberal women are on the least happy and loneliest in America

[Caveira]

I didn’t marry a liberal woman.   I work in IT, very left dominated, but we really never ever discuss politics.   That is a big no no in my field.  I just don’t know.   Is this true?   If so, can their husbands do anything to help them?   Maybe shovel the snow or change the oil in the car.  I really am not sure here.   Open the hard to open jars?

Liberal women the 'least happy and loneliest' in America, according to a new survey

New evidence in the 2024 American Family Survey, found that 37 percent of conservative women from the ages of 18-40 reported being satisfied with their life. 

Only 12 percent of liberal women in the same group said they felt the same way, while 28 percent of moderate said they were satisfied.

https://nypost.com/2025/02/14/lifestyle/new-poll-shows-liberal-women-the-most-unhappy-lonely/

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14398225/amp/liberal-woman-happy-lonely-america-survey.html

There are more articles but they get redundant pretty quick.   

Edited 19 hours ago by Caveira

[Paul158]

51 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I didn’t marry a liberal woman.   I work in IT, very left dominated, but we really never ever discuss politics.   That is a big no no in my field.  I just don’t know.   Is this true?   If so, can their husbands do anything to help them?   Maybe shovel the snow or change the oil in the car.  I really am not sure here.   Open the hard to open jars?

Liberal women the 'least happy and loneliest' in America, according to a new survey

 

New evidence in the 2024 American Family Survey, found that 37 percent of conservative women from the ages of 18-40 reported being satisfied with their life. 

Only 12 percent of liberal women in the same group said they felt the same way, while 28 percent of moderate said they were satisfied.

https://nypost.com/2025/02/14/lifestyle/new-poll-shows-liberal-women-the-most-unhappy-lonely/

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14398225/amp/liberal-woman-happy-lonely-america-survey.html

There are more articles but they get redundant pretty quick.   

Yes, it is true.

[Paul158]

56 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I didn’t marry a liberal woman.   I work in IT, very left dominated, but we really never ever discuss politics.   That is a big no no in my field.  I just don’t know.   Is this true?   If so, can their husbands do anything to help them?   Maybe shovel the snow or change the oil in the car.  I really am not sure here.   Open the hard to open jars?

Liberal women the 'least happy and loneliest' in America, according to a new survey

 

New evidence in the 2024 American Family Survey, found that 37 percent of conservative women from the ages of 18-40 reported being satisfied with their life. 

Only 12 percent of liberal women in the same group said they felt the same way, while 28 percent of moderate said they were satisfied.

https://nypost.com/2025/02/14/lifestyle/new-poll-shows-liberal-women-the-most-unhappy-lonely/

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14398225/amp/liberal-woman-happy-lonely-america-survey.html

There are more articles but they get redundant pretty quick.   

Guess who is second on the list.

[Caveira]

Just now, Paul158 said:

Guess who is second on the list.

Liberal men?   We need commentary from the Viking and the trip and sweep to be honest.  

[Paul158]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

Liberal men?   We need commentary from the Viking and the trip and sweep to be honest.  

Are you sure we really need that? I don't think so.

[RockLobster]

Caveira and Paul158 getting together to discuss loneliness. I'm glad they found each other. 

It's adorable.

[Paul158]

19 minutes ago, RockLobster said:

Caveira and Paul158 getting together to discuss loneliness. I'm glad they found each other. 

It's adorable.

Just the facts Dano. Just the facts. Book'em Dano.

[Lipdrag]

10 hours ago, Paul158 said:

Just the facts Dano. Just the facts. Book'em Dano.

Is this mixing shows?  Wasn't "Just the facts" from Dragnet?  Jack Webb.

Dano was Hawaii Five-O.  Booking 'em.

I suppose it is simple to look up but I decided to do this instead.

 

[mspart]

Jack Webb was ahead of his time with his Just the Fax ma'am.  

Jack Lord constantly said Bookem Dano in the awesome Hawaii 5-0 show.  

I lived in Hawaii for 4 years, and I can say that everyone associated with that show is revered there.   Dano was still alive at that time and was held as a hero.   Jim Nabors as well.  

My guess about liberal women is that they are so bitter no one wants to be around them.  

mspart

[red viking]

This does appear to be true, but this is only a correlation and not a cause-effect relationship. Those that have some basic scientific background understand just how flawed it would be to draw a cause-effect relationship here. 

For example, there are several factors that would generally cause somebody to be happier AND more conservative at the same time: A few that come to mind:

1) Being a man (possible), 2) Being white, 3) Being religious and attending church (even though the Christian church is full of BS, most likely), 4) Having more money, 5) Being married, 6) Not being homeless, 7) Being older, #8 not being handicapped, and 9) Not having significant health problems. There are many more if you look at the data. 

Basically, the downtrodden in society that are struggling just to get by and don't know where their next meal is coming from or how their kids are going to be able to go to college are going to tend to be more liberal and also unhappy. The fat cats with great jobs and health that have never faced adversity, discrimination or financial insecurity, etc are going to tend to be happier AND more conservative, all other factors being equal. 

It's extremely basic and should be easy to understand. 

Edited 3 hours ago by red viking

[mspart]

Are you saying liberal women are not white, do not have money, are homeless, and are older?   Did you not read the age of these women is 18-40?   I would agree that they are not men and probably do not belong to any organized religion.  Religion is fairly antithetical to being liberal.   

mspart

[red viking]

2 minutes ago, mspart said:

Are you saying liberal women are not white, do not have money, are homeless, and are older?   Did you not read the age of these women is 18-40?   I would agree that they are not men and probably do not belong to any organized religion.  Religion is fairly antithetical to being liberal.   

mspart

On average, they are more likely to be a minority, have less money, have a higher rate of homelessness, disabilities, be uneducated, single, not practice spirituality, etc. compared to conservative women. Good that they controlled for age, but there are several other factors at play here. You can't do anything close to drawing a cause-effect relationship based upon this information. 

 

[red viking]

7 minutes ago, mspart said:

Religion is fairly antithetical to being liberal.   

Yes, but spirituality doesn't have to be. You can practice spirituality without following a dogmatic b.s. religion. Religion is for the mentally weak. 

Edited 3 hours ago by red viking

[wrestlingguy]

Every person I associate with that is liberal it's because they all have the "white savior complex" and they have to broadcast every bit of their virtue signaling online for validation or look at me purposes. They are miserable because when they don't receive the validation they seek it's just depressing because they don't actually care about anything they just want to give off that perception.

[mspart]

5 minutes ago, red viking said:

Yes, but spirituality doesn't have to be. You can practice spirituality without following a dogmatic b.s. religion. Religion is for the mentally weak. 

I couldn't have walked into it any better than this.

7 minutes ago, red viking said:

On average, they are more likely to be a minority, have less money, have a higher rate of homelessness, disabilities, be uneducated, single, not practice spirituality, etc. compared to conservative women. Good that they controlled for age, but there are several other factors at play here. You can't do anything close to drawing a cause-effect relationship based upon this information. 

 

Do you  have anything that proves your point here.   Just because you say it doesn't make it so. 

mspart

[red viking]

13 minutes ago, mspart said:

I couldn't have walked into it any better than this.

Do you  have anything that proves your point here.   Just because you say it doesn't make it so. 

mspart

I think it's pretty clear that these are common sense associations. All other factors being equal, a healthy person with more money will be happier than a person that has to live on welfare due to health problems. Same with most or all of the other factors I cited above. 

No, I'm not going to "look it up," because I know that you know it's true. I'm sure  there are plenty of studies that prove these correlations if you do a simple search. 

You're the ones (or at least Caveira) that appear to be implying that there is cause-effect relationship here, so the onus is on you. Or are you merely saying there is a correlation and stopping right there? If so, then I don't have a problem. The majority of scientific studies do appear to show this correlation. While interesting, a correlation doesn't really mean much because there can be dramatically different reasons for any correlation. 

Edited 2 hours ago by red viking

[Caveira]

13 minutes ago, red viking said:

I think it's pretty clear that these are common sense associations. All other factors being equal, a healthy person with more money will be happier than a person that has to live on welfare due to health problems. Same with most or all of the other factors I cited above. 

No, I'm not going to "look it up," because I know that you know it's true. I'm sure  there are plenty of studies that prove these correlations if you do a simple search. 

You're the ones (or at least Caveira) that appear to be implying that there is cause-effect relationship here, so the onus is on you. Or are you merely saying there is a correlation and stopping right there? If so, then I don't have a problem. The majority of scientific studies do appear to show this correlation. While interesting, a correlation doesn't really mean much because there can be dramatically different reasons for any correlation. 

I posted survey results.  That claim that 12% of women whom are liberal are not happy.  Asked for your thoughts.  
 I think I also eluded to not really knowing liberal women…. Although working with some in IT.    

[red viking]

10 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I posted survey results.  That claim that 12% of women whom are liberal are not happy.  Asked for your thoughts.  
 I think I also eluded to not really knowing liberal women…. Although working with some in IT.    

OK. Usually wingers try to draw cause-effect relationships without further data when they find a correlation that they like. If you aren't doing that, then my bad. It does appear to be a factual correlation. I would add that I think it applies to men too, from what I can tell. Perhaps the correlation is stronger for women.  If so, the reasons why would be interesting to look into. 

[Caveira]

Just now, red viking said:

OK. Usually wingers try to draw cause-effect relationships without further data when they find a correlation that they like. If you aren't doing that, then my bad. It does appear to be a factual correlation. I would add that I think it applies to men too, from what I can tell. Perhaps the correlation is stronger for women.  If so, the reasons why would be interesting to look into. 

Maybe get a therapist if you’re not happy.  I don’t know what to tell them if the survey results are accurate.  

[mspart]

2 hours ago, red viking said:

I think it's pretty clear that these are common sense associations. All other factors being equal, a healthy person with more money will be happier than a person that has to live on welfare due to health problems. Same with most or all of the other factors I cited above. 

No, I'm not going to "look it up," because I know that you know it's true. I'm sure  there are plenty of studies that prove these correlations if you do a simple search. 

You're the ones (or at least Caveira) that appear to be implying that there is cause-effect relationship here, so the onus is on you. Or are you merely saying there is a correlation and stopping right there? If so, then I don't have a problem. The majority of scientific studies do appear to show this correlation. While interesting, a correlation doesn't really mean much because there can be dramatically different reasons for any correlation. 

You still have not providing anything to support your specious claim, other than to say it seems pretty clear. 

I think it seems pretty clear that most liberal women in that age group are white women, of means and education.  That shoots down a few of your "it seems clear" suggestions. 

And you saying Religion is for mental midgets is pure leftism like I said and yet you said it anyway.   Proving the point.   Bring some proof of your suggestions and then a more intelligent conversation can be held.

mspart

[red viking]

1 minute ago, mspart said:

You still have not providing anything to support your specious claim, other than to say it seems pretty clear. 

I think it seems pretty clear that most liberal women in that age group are white women, of means and education.  That shoots down a few of your "it seems clear" suggestions. 

And you saying Religion is for mental midgets is pure leftism like I said and yet you said it anyway.   Proving the point.   Bring some proof of your suggestions and then a more intelligent conversation can be held.

mspart

If you aren't trying to draw a cause-effect relationship then I don't really care to take it any farther because I'm not arguing that there isn't a correlation. If you are trying to draw a cause-effect relationship, then back it up. If you aren't, then what's the significance?