Jan 6 report is out.

[Offthemat]

2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

You understand what you’re told to understand, through the very narrow tube in which they want to feed it to you.  That is one of the more obvious things on this board. 

Shallow and delusional.  Jack Smith, following his rejection, was wallowing at the bottom of the barrel at the Hague when they went looking for someone to lead the election interference campaign.  The perfect candidate - had already been destroyed by the Court - and dumb and hungry enough to repeat the performance.  Go on, educate yourself. 

[Wrestleknownothing]

4 hours ago, Offthemat said:

And that verdict was returned on Nov. 5.

Confirming that F you got in civics

[WrestlingRasta]

6 hours ago, Offthemat said:

Shallow and delusional. 

Precisely.  Congratulations the first step is recognition.  There is hope for you.  Maybe you can shed the wool after all. 

[Tripnsweep]

I think it's funny how a bunch of people are willing to believe somebody with a long and well documented history of lying, deceipt, and habitual dishonesty (not to mention being on the losing end of litigation repeatedly) is now somehow the victim of some vast conspiracy. 

Instead of thinking about this in rational terms, like any normal person should, and realizing, hey, maybe this guy who has been a liar and con man for decades might be full of it and trying to save his own ass. 

[Caveira]

23 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

I think it's funny how a bunch of people are willing to believe somebody with a long and well documented history of lying, deceipt, and habitual dishonesty (not to mention being on the losing end of litigation repeatedly) is now somehow the victim of some vast conspiracy. 

Instead of thinking about this in rational terms, like any normal person should, and realizing, hey, maybe this guy who has been a liar and con man for decades might be full of it and trying to save his own ass. 

Stop changing the topic back to the bidens.   Sheesh.  

[Offthemat]

1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Precisely.  Congratulations the first step is recognition.  There is hope for you.  Maybe you can shed the wool after all. 

I’m not going to engage your personal attacks.  Given the difficulty of defending your position and your chronic denial to do so, anyway, I understand why you would resort to it.  But it only weakens your already diminished credibility. 

[Offthemat]

13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Stop changing the topic back to the bidens.   Sheesh.  

I thought he was describing Jack Smith. 

[WrestlingRasta]

35 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Stop changing the topic back to the bidens.   Sheesh.  

Something something DS

[WrestlingRasta]

19 hours ago, Offthemat said:

Reading Jack Smith is what you consider an education?  That explains a lot. 

 

25 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

I’m not going to engage your personal attacks.  

 Good call.    Next time don't open the door if you can't handle it being walked through.  We've talked about this previously when these little chats don't work out so well...  

[jross]

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

The party in power wrote the report.

2 + 2 is 4, not 5.

The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.

[jross]

Why does the report leave out what Trump was responding to? 

That is the well-funded cabal of powerful people that collaborated across industries to influence perceptions, change voting laws, and steer media coverage "in the shadows". 

When Trump was winning on the first day of the 2020 election, does it mention that both the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (business) and AFL-CIO (labor) issued a joint statement for the public to have patience in vote counting and trust in the electoral process?

Does it mention that its currently impossible to certify the presidential elections to be free of fraud?

Does it mention that there are still legal challenges unresolved from the 2020 election? 

When many court cases are dismissed on procedural issues, where the underlying case is serious and everyday real people under oath give witness to observed fraud, how can the public trust the courts? 

The white house could use a good cleansing.

[Offthemat]

46 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

 

 Good call.    Next time don't open the door if you can't handle it being walked through.  We've talked about this previously when these little chats don't work out so well...  

I don’t recall any of your little chats working out well.  With anybody. 

[mspart]

DOJ never adjudicated an Insurrection case as a result of Jan 6.   It hasn't happened.   But Jack Smith repeatedly calls Jan 6 an insurrection.   He even says he will not prosecute on insurrection, yet refers to that throughout the report.   Right there you have a person that is on a witch hunt.   This guy is supposed to represent the DOJ.   The DOJ did not prosecute anyone for insurrection.   He wasn't going to do so.   But he repeatedly called it an insurrection.   How in the world do you portray this as an insurrection yet don't prosecute that.  

As opposed to my use of a link to show problems with the report, this is something I noticed.  

mspart

[Husker_Du]

lol. jack smith wrote a report. welp, i guess that settles it then. haha.

[Offthemat]

18 minutes ago, mspart said:

DOJ never adjudicated an Insurrection case as a result of Jan 6.   It hasn't happened.   But Jack Smith repeatedly calls Jan 6 an insurrection.   He even says he will not prosecute on insurrection, yet refers to that throughout the report.   Right there you have a person that is on a witch hunt.   This guy is supposed to represent the DOJ.   The DOJ did not prosecute anyone for insurrection.   He wasn't going to do so.   But he repeatedly called it an insurrection.   How in the world do you portray this as an insurrection yet don't prosecute that.  

As opposed to my use of a link to show problems with the report, this is something I noticed.  

mspart

I don’t see any issue with providing links.  Or quoting from them, like this:

Byron York

”In the end, Smith failed all around. He ran out of time. He was not able to put Trump on trial, and then, worst-case scenario for the prosecutor, the defendant was elected president of the United States. The case is over. 

But the nation learned something from the man the Justice Department chose to pursue Biden's political opponent. They learned that the prosecutor would never, ever admit what he was doing, even if everyone could see it, plain as day.

The country knew what Jack Smith, cheered on by Democrats and their allies in the media, was trying to accomplish, and a winning margin of the voters put an end to it on Election Day.”

http://jewishworldreview.com/0125/york011525.php