Would removing Saylors-Tiny-Willie from the forum be a good thing? What say you.

[Paul158]

Would it be asking too much to remove this guy from the forum. Thanks in advance moderators.

[Scouts Honor]

no

he is my comic relief

[ionel]

1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

Would it be asking too much to remove this guy from the forum. Thanks in advance moderators.

We need a poll.  

Yes

The username alone should be enough but combined with the post ...

[ionel]

1 minute ago, Scouts Honor said:

no

he is my comic relief

Well there is that.

[Paul158]

Just now, ionel said:

We need a poll.  

Yes

The username alone should be enough but combined with the post ...

If You can start one that would be great.

[Paul158]

2 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

no

he is my comic relief

Just watch reruns of Kamala explaining her policies.

[ionel]

5 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

If You can start one that would be great.

Bob gave you 15 minutes. 

[wrestlingguy]

9 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

no

he is my comic relief

I thought he/she was the only one that thinks he/she is funny. He/she offers nothing of substance. 100% Troll.

[Scouts Honor]

it always makes me giggle

[ionel]

9 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

I thought he/she was the only one that thinks he/she is funny. He/she offers nothing of substance. 100% Troll.

You may be correct about they.  

[1032004]

32 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Would it be asking too much to remove this guy from the forum. Thanks in advance moderators.

Are you pro censorship?

[Paul158]

6 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Are you pro censorship?

It looks like the individual has already been removed from this forum several times by the moderators. But he/she/it/whatever keeps coming back under a new name. What do you think should be done. I believe once you are removed you should stay removed.

Edited September 25 by Paul158
missed a word

[wrestlingguy]

53 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Are you pro censorship?

Anti-Troll. They offer nothing of substance to the forum.

[mspart]

Best solution would be for STW to moderate him/herself.   Barring that, he/she adds nothing to this board.   Comments are attacks, not discussion.   I would rather he/she take personal responsibility and moderate their content here. 

mspart

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Anti-Troll. They offer nothing of substance to the forum.

I don’t really follow this forum.  I see he’s posted a bunch of links for additional reading.  Maybe a little name-calling but nothing ban-worthy IMO or that anyone older than 12 would really be offended by, but feel free to share a specific post of his that justifies him being banned.

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, Paul158 said:

It looks like the individual has already been removed from this forum several times by the moderators. But he/she/it/whatever keeps coming back under a new name. What do you think should be done. I believe once you are removed you should stay removed.

Easier said than done no?   I suppose they could ban originating IP address …. But with a vpn that can be spuffed pretty easy.   

[wrestlingguy]

45 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I don’t really follow this forum.  I see he’s posted a bunch of links for additional reading.  Maybe a little name-calling but nothing ban-worthy IMO or that anyone older than 12 would really be offended by, but feel free to share a specific post of his that justifies him being banned.

I guess I ruled out the possibility they could actually be in their teens. That would make so much more sense.

[1032004]

Just now, wrestlingguy said:

I guess I ruled out the possibility they could actually be in their teens. That would make so much more sense.

Well his posts certainly seem a lot more tame than what I see in other areas of social media 

[Paul158]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Well his posts certainly seem a lot more tame than what I see in other areas of social media 

Thats a pretty low bar. But if you get removed and decide to come back under another name maybe you could refrain from doing the same stupid things that got you removed in the first place.

[1032004]

4 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Thats a pretty low bar. But if you get removed and decide to come back under another name maybe you could refrain from doing the same stupid things that got you removed in the first place.

What was his name before?

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

What was his name before?

Red Viking?

[jross]

There is a feature for this...

[ionel]

13 minutes ago, jross said:

There is a feature for this...

[Wrestleknownothing]

54 minutes ago, jross said:

There is a feature for this...

Don't look now, but it would seem JimmyBT's return is imminent. From Jagger's 7/19 Mailbag:

Why would someone block someone (until the end of September) from your Intermat forum with no warning or notice of why it happened? I was told to take it to the zoo, which I did. Doesn’t make sense when it’s going to cost you a yearly premium subscription. Just wondering. Jim H (Cinnabon?) 

Is it my forum? I barely even go on there. I’m sorry this happened to you but I don’t believe you need a subscription to use the forum. Just like this mailbag. Which is a good thing since I doubt I’m moving the needle on subscriptions. Either way, I’ll make sure to wake you up when September ends.

I assume Jagger added the parenthetical (Cinnabon?)

Edited September 25 by Wrestleknownothing

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

21 hours ago, Paul158 said:

Would it be asking too much to remove this guy from the forum. Thanks in advance moderators.

Cry harder.