Jump to content

Paid Letter: The truth about Tim Walz. Just a few issues with his military record. Was only a Master Sergeant.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone else feel like three year olds are running the country and the next four years it'll be 5 to 8 year olds? 

  • Bob 2

.

Posted
4 hours ago, Caveira said:

Tim walz: we can’t afford four more years of this lol      

 

I actually agree with Tim on this. Probably the only honest thing he has said in the last 6 weeks.

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
  • Jagger 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Paul158 said:

I actually agree with Tim on this. Probably the only honest thing he has said in the last 6 weeks.

it is kind of weird having the Dems running against the record of the Dems.  Doubly weird to have the Kam-eleon run against her own record.  The problem is that the Dem and brain dead independents are too stupid (or too indoctrinated) to know this.

  • Bob 2
  • Clown 1
Posted

The leaders are in denial about their failures, while their followers are acting like they just won a prize in a contest no one remembers entering.

Posted
12 hours ago, Lipdrag said:

it is kind of weird having the Dems running against the record of the Dems.  Doubly weird to have the Kam-eleon run against her own record.  The problem is that the Dem and brain dead independents are too stupid (or too indoctrinated) to know this.

I've modified the wikipedia article on 'Irony' to include your picture.

Posted
7 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

I've modified the wikipedia article on 'Irony' to include your picture.

42694d8d-6f70-415b-99e1-e6d023c14278_tex

.

Posted

Man the debate moderators were so blatantly biased that the debate was an absolute joke!!  I can't believe people put any stock in those things...it's pathetic.  The other take away is Vance is 10 times a better speaker then bumbling Walz...yikes.

  • Bob 2
  • Fire 1
  • Wrestle 1
Posted

Vance certainly won the debate hands down. To the point he may have even driven some conservative voters who want conservative policy but just can’t vote for Trump. 
 

That said, I thought the moderators did just fine. They called both out on discrepancies. They were diligent in keeping on topic and in the time frame. And they cut the mic when it went out of those parameters.  
 

Their job is not to ask the question and then just shut up until the candidates are done talking (we would never get anywhere). The job title is ‘moderator’ for a reason. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Vance certainly won the debate hands down. To the point he may have even driven some conservative voters who want conservative policy but just can’t vote for Trump. 
 

That said, I thought the moderators did just fine. They called both out on discrepancies. They were diligent in keeping on topic and in the time frame. And they cut the mic when it went out of those parameters.  
 

Their job is not to ask the question and then just shut up until the candidates are done talking (we would never get anywhere). The job title is ‘moderator’ for a reason. 

Just curious as maybe I missed it, but when did the moderators fact check Walz?  Honest question.

Both said things that were probably factually wrong but Vance was the only one called out on it that I saw.  Not to mention, from what I read the debate rules said there would be no fact checking by the moderators.  Also, in my opinion "moderating" doesn't mean your job is to call people out or fact check but rather to ask the questions (which were biased but it is what it is), then moderate the candidates to follow the rules...that's it.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Just curious as maybe I missed it, but when did the moderators fact check Walz?  Honest question.

Both said things that were probably factually wrong but Vance was the only one called out on it that I saw.  Not to mention, from what I read the debate rules said there would be no fact checking by the moderators.  Also, in my opinion "moderating" doesn't mean your job is to call people out or fact check but rather to ask the questions (which were biased but it is what it is), then moderate the candidates to follow the rules...that's it.

I don’t remember the exact questions, but specifically recall them going to back to Walz to clarify the reality in discrepancies in what he said.  I didn’t see where it was any more or less one way than the other. I also didn’t see the questions were at all biased.  And frankly I don’t have any problem whatsoever with the moderators calling out a blatant lie for either one. But republicans were already before the debate even started that it was rigged, just like in 2020 they pre emoted the election. 
 

I felt the moderators did exactly what they were supposed to do and did a good job. Others can and will disagree. 

Posted

Funny that the wingers attack the Walz military record when Trumpy dodged the draft several times so served no time whatsoever. The hypocrisy of the right...

Posted
2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Funny that the wingers attack the Walz military record when Trumpy dodged the draft several times so served no time whatsoever. The hypocrisy of the right...

You do realize it is YOU that is showing your hypocrisy, right?!  I better spelled it out as I am sure you will never get it...aren't you being a hypocrite, based on your definition, by saying there is nothing wrong with what Walz lied about, but criticize Trump by claiming he dodged the draft??

Posted
49 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I don’t remember the exact questions, but specifically recall them going to back to Walz to clarify the reality in discrepancies in what he said.  I didn’t see where it was any more or less one way than the other. I also didn’t see the questions were at all biased.  And frankly I don’t have any problem whatsoever with the moderators calling out a blatant lie for either one. But republicans were already before the debate even started that it was rigged, just like in 2020 they pre emoted the election. 
 

I felt the moderators did exactly what they were supposed to do and did a good job. Others can and will disagree. 

Huh...got it.  Guess people will choose to see and hear what they want.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Bodie Abbey

    Hartland, Michigan
    Class of 2026
    Committed to Michigan
    Projected Weight: 133

    Ally Jelinek

    Linn-Mar, Iowa
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Lindenwood (Women)
    Projected Weight: 117, 124

    Ella Gahl

    Northfield, Indiana
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Manchester (Women)
    Projected Weight: 138

    Natalie Rush

    Canon-McMillan, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to West Liberty (Women)
    Projected Weight: 207

    Elsie Olson

    Eastview, Minnesota
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Augsburg (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160
×
×
  • Create New...