Scouts Honor Posted July 25 Posted July 25 6 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said: Back to this again. Looking for one outlier to try to prove a universal point. Its weak to say the least. Who shot at the former president? Did they actually kill someone? What party did they(shooter) associate with? Please stop doing this. You aren't making the point you think you are. when 'one' outlier becomes many... it's no longer an outlier. 1
ionel Posted July 25 Posted July 25 9 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said: Those are disgusting creatures. I'm not talking about the maggots. 2 .
RockLobster Posted July 25 Posted July 25 1 hour ago, ionel said: Those are disgusting creatures. I'm not talking about the maggots. Yuck. Those are some sick, sick people. The radicals of politics deserve a kick in the tail. There are levels of basic decency. Doesn't matter which side, basic decency shouldn't be disregarded.
RockLobster Posted July 25 Posted July 25 8 hours ago, ionel said: Also who is teaching these lies to young people? Nevermind ... I know the answer to that. The older nut bags who believe in whatever political illusion they choose to. All political parties included.
RockLobster Posted July 25 Posted July 25 15 hours ago, Bigbrog said: LOL It's fine, you can be wrong, ignorant, narcissistic, psychotic, weak, clueless, judgmental, racist, cowardly, victim, boogeyman chaser, conspiracy theory nut job...you've proven that and will prove it again. You obviously have me confused with Trump. (I'm much younger, smarter, and better looking than the orange turd you refer to.)
Bigbrog Posted July 25 Posted July 25 8 hours ago, RockLobster said: You obviously have me confused with Trump. (I'm much younger, smarter, and better looking than the orange turd you refer to.)
ThreePointTakedown Posted July 25 Posted July 25 12 hours ago, Scouts Honor said: when 'one' outlier becomes many... it's no longer an outlier. I'm sorry but when you say 'many' to try to bolster your point. You look lazy. 'Many' should be a 'significant amount/percentage'. Then we can talk about what number would you say is 'significant'. What are your metrics for making that decision? 'Many' could be three or four. If its still a vanishingly small number, in the end, then what would be your point in posting that? As soon as you can prove those points. Which your post does not. Then you can say that. What percentage does your example make of the whole number? Do you know? Did you even try to find out?
Scouts Honor Posted July 25 Posted July 25 5 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said: I'm sorry but when you say 'many' to try to bolster your point. You look lazy. 'Many' should be a 'significant amount/percentage'. Then we can talk about what number would you say is 'significant'. how about JUST the ones i have posted JUST on this thread 1
Bigbrog Posted August 9 Posted August 9 4 hours ago, Scouts Honor said: is this fear? I'd prefer that person not use "Ladies & Gentleman" as that is not very inclusive... Even though it covers about 99.99991% of the population 1
ionel Posted August 10 Posted August 10 44 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said: Well sure but those two seem normal. 1 .
mspart Posted September 5 Posted September 5 (edited) 2 hours ago, Scouts Honor said: i mean why not.. everything else is privilege What? This is preposterous. The loony left has gone overboard on looniness. I disadvantaged how many kids by reading the Harry Potter books to mine? Stoopid. mspart Edited September 5 by mspart 1
wrestlingguy Posted September 5 Posted September 5 2 hours ago, Scouts Honor said: i mean why not.. everything else is privilege Jesus Christ it's called a PUBLIC library and all schools have libraries. When do people just admit they are lazy and just want an excuse. I might suggest they rent "the pursuit of happiness" to see how to overcome obstacles and nut up. 1
Danny Deck Posted September 5 Posted September 5 From a more in depth article, I find this interesting if not altogether surprising: ‘The evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t—the difference in their life chances—is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,’ he says. I have friends who have custody of their nephew now, and his academic improvement in the year he has been with them is remarkable. They do read to him at night, and I think it's a signal that there are lots of other good habits they have when it comes to raising him. 2
uncle bernard Posted September 5 Posted September 5 25 minutes ago, mspart said: What? This is preposterous. The loony left has gone overboard on looniness. I disadvantaged how many kids by reading the Harry Potter books to mine? Stoopid. mspart Not every crackpot academic with their head up their ass is representative of "the left." This is not a mainstream left opinion. This is just someone trying to get their op-eds published with rage bait. Angry clicks count the same as happy ones.
Scouts Honor Posted September 5 Posted September 5 i was reading to mine in the womb. they knew my voice when they were born.
Lipdrag Posted September 5 Posted September 5 1 hour ago, Scouts Honor said: i mean why not.. everything else is privilege Harrison Bergeron was a book before its time. If you did not take crack cocaine during pregnancy and birth an addicted child you unfairly disadvantaged other people's children according to this nimrod. 1
Danny Deck Posted September 5 Posted September 5 3 hours ago, Scouts Honor said: i mean why not.. everything else is privilege Just realized this article is 9 years old.
Calli Gilchrist Choate Rosemary Hall, Connecticut Class of 2025 Committed to Brown (Women) Projected Weight: 124
Eren Sement Council Rock North, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Michigan Projected Weight: 141
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now