Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

 

 

So, he predicted exactly how you and the press would twist and turn his statement. I'm shocked!!!

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

This just in:

Man predicts bad thing he said will be viewed as bad thing. Gets credit for his prediction.

I would give you a 🏆 but Bob took that away from us so here's a 🍌 instead.  🙂

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
4 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

This just in:

Man predicts bad thing he said "in jest" will be viewed as bad thing. Gets credit for his prediction.

Posted
1 hour ago, jross said:
5 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

This just in:

Man predicts bad thing he said "in jest" will be viewed as bad thing. Gets credit for his prediction.

There you fixed for him. 

Posted
3 hours ago, jross said:
7 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

This just in:

Man predicts bad thing he said "in jest" will be viewed as bad thing. Gets credit for his prediction.

Man knows how to trigger the TDS afflicted.  Does it repeatedly with success.  Like taking candy from a baby.  With the same results. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Man knows how to trigger the TDS afflicted.  Does it repeatedly with success.  Like taking candy from a baby.  With the same results. 

Don't worry. He cares about ypu because you are special and different. Not like them.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted

The triggering talk is true. And likewise there are a handful of other folks who people get all up in a fuss over, and you know what they were not doing today…..visiting a probation officer. But, but……🤣
 

(We’re seeing on a few of these threads what happens when you attach your sense of self, and get conned, to a con man.) 

Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The triggering talk is true. And likewise there are a handful of other folks who people get all up in a fuss over, and you know what they were not doing today…..visiting a probation officer. But, but……🤣
 

(We’re seeing on a few of these threads what happens when you attach your sense of self, and get conned, to a con man.) 

 

You're projecting.

  • Fire 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

But fortunately for us, a subject you could certainly teach me all about. 😉

Yep I could. Sadly it’s all those kids you talk about that would get a different message from your translation.  😉

Posted
8 minutes ago, JimmyBT said:

Yep I could. Sadly it’s all those kids you talk about that would get a different message from your translation.  😉

Weak. Get back to work and try to come up with something better. 
 

We’ll see how it turns out. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Weak. Get back to work and try to come up with something better. 
 

We’ll see how it turns out. 

That’s how I know I’m right.  Carry on KIDDO 

  • Bob 1
Posted

uh. it's called a joke.

but i'm sure you're the same kinda stoolie that supported the notion

"Trump said he'll be a dictator on Day 1!"

which, of course, are the same kinda stoolies that called it the 'Don't say gay' bill.

in other words, dishonest pearl clutchers. 

  • Bob 1

TBD

Posted
7 hours ago, Threadkilla said:

 

You're projecting.

No, I’m coming across trigger points. You obviously took that a little personal, or you wouldn’t have responded, it was that comment that pushed you to enter the chat  

A little self reflection can go a long way. 

Posted
2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

No, I’m coming across trigger points. You obviously took that a little personal, or you wouldn’t have responded, it was that comment that pushed you to enter the chat  

A little self reflection can go a long way. 

You might want to read this again. You responded to my comment right? Don’t take things so personal.  Self reflection is good.  Bahahahhahahaha

Posted
5 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

uh. it's called a joke.

but i'm sure you're the same kinda stoolie that supported the notion

"Trump said he'll be a dictator on Day 1!"

which, of course, are the same kinda stoolies that called it the 'Don't say gay' bill.

in other words, dishonest pearl clutchers. 

Nope, neither.

But I do believe in the "when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time" philosophy.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
51 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Nope, neither.

But I do believe in the "when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time" philosophy.

I'm sure most of the flock in here would have the exact same sentiment if the other douchebag candidate said the exact same thing.🙄

Posted

On a purely historical level, it’s so fascinating how Trump has changed the rules of the game. Pre-2016, a single one of these weird tangents could have ended a whole campaign.

Trump has one every week and hardly anybody blinks an eye. It’s wild. I don’t think it’s a bad thing. The focus should always be on policy anyway. 

  • Bob 1
Posted

The quality of life was significantly better under Trump for myself and everyone I know compared to Biden, and the difference isn't close. So, even if Trump meant what he said in jest, I will vote for him because presidential policy outcomes matter more than tact.

As if these 'gotchas' matter... 

I do not relate to these people 

------------

Policy Outcomes Over Personality:

You have two choices of mechanics to get your car fixed. Who do you choose?

  • Mechanic 1: Rude but fixes the car perfectly every time.
  • Mechanic 2: Well-mannered but makes mistakes and doesn't always fix the problem.

You have two choices of surgeons. Who do you choose?

  • Surgeon 1: Brash bedside manner with good skill and a high success rate in the procedure you need.
  • Surgeon 2: Friendly and empathetic bedside manner, with a much lower success rate for the procedure you need.

I favor Trump and pick Mechanic 1 and Surgeon 1 because I prioritize effective outcomes over personal demeanor for those tasks.

To be fair... Personality Over Outcomes:

In a different context, consider you have two choices of teachers. Who do you choose for your child?

  • Teacher 1: Great knowledge and curriculum but is harsh.
  • Teacher 2: Decent understanding and curriculum but is kind and encouraging.

I will select Teacher 2, prioritizing my child's emotional well-being and learning environment over the teacher's superior knowledge.  The context is different and matters.  

Why do people engage in self-harm by holding onto the belief that the last four years were superior to the preceding four years, and advocating for four more years of discomfort?

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...