Republican Oversight Committee rejects Hunter Biden's request to give his testimony in public

[VakAttack]

9 minutes ago, headshuck said:

The conversation has been about allowing investigation, you’d think you’d appreciate that.

Literally nobody is stopping them from investigating, and certainly nobody is making them, repeatedly claim they have evidence, and then when it's time to put up, they pee down their legs.  Is it likely a huge waste of taxpayer money to investigate nothing purely to prop up the ego of one 79 year old man-child and/or to pass modern GOP purity tests?  Yes, of course.  But who cares?  The Party of Limited Government and Cutting Government Waste continues their complete shift if philosophy!

[headshuck]

Theres been smoke for a long time.

https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110331/documents/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD067.pdf

[VakAttack]

16 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Theres been smoke for a long time.

https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110331/documents/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD067.pdf

Thank God we all woke up from our nightmare. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1247320

[jross]

 

 

 

[jross]

Probably don't have enough votes to open an inquiry no matter how much evidence there is that an investigation is needed.

[Plasmodium]

My question is - Does anybody care?  I don't see any pushback.  I certainly don't care.  If the GOP weren't so discombobulated, they would have already impeached him for Lord knows what.

[Paul158]

8 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

One of his alleged business partners has like 50  public tax returns available to anyone who wants to see them.  Fortunately for that partner, years of cross referencing Hunter's income has proven completely fruitless and humiliating for the haters.

We shall see. By the way what are shell companies  and off shore bank accounts used for?

[Paul158]

6 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

My question is - Does anybody care?  I don't see any pushback.  I certainly don't care.  If the GOP weren't so discombobulated, they would have already impeached him for Lord knows what.

Sort of like the democrats with  TDS did with Trump for 4 years when he was President.

[Plasmodium]

3 hours ago, Paul158 said:

Sort of like the democrats with  TDS did with Trump for 4 years when he was President.

They impeached him X2.  His own DOJ prosecuted hundreds of indictments stemming from his own campaign.

[Offthemat]

9 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

My question is - Does anybody care?  I don't see any pushback.  I certainly don't care.  If the GOP weren't so discombobulated, they would have already impeached him for Lord knows what.

Two words:  Kamela Harris. 

[Offthemat]

10 hours ago, VakAttack said:

Literally nobody is stopping them from investigating, and certainly nobody is making them, repeatedly claim they have evidence, and then when it's time to put up, they pee down their legs.  Is it likely a huge waste of taxpayer money to investigate nothing purely to prop up the ego of one 79 year old man-child and/or to pass modern GOP purity tests?  Yes, of course.  But who cares?  The Party of Limited Government and Cutting Government Waste continues their complete shift if philosophy!

The recorded evidence of the Ukrainian bribery is claimed by the Ukrainian oligarch to be in his possession.  Congress has no subpoena power over Ukrainian oligarchs and he has no motivation for self incrimination.  The proof is in the pudding, biden’s admission, the actions taken, and the bank deposits.  There’s no value in relying on Ukrainian proceedings; you get what you pay for. 
 

More importantly, anyone who doesn’t see evidence for impeachment and removal (Romney) only needs to visit the southern border.  Adding to the NY mayor and governor’s pleadings, now the dim governor of AZ is demanding over $50billion to deal with the illegals.  Dereliction of duty and a threat to National security is enough. 

[Plasmodium]

4 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

The recorded evidence of the Ukrainian bribery is claimed by the Ukrainian oligarch to be in his possession.  Congress has no subpoena power over Ukrainian oligarchs and he has no motivation for self incrimination.  The proof is in the pudding, biden’s admission, the actions taken, and the bank deposits.  There’s no value in relying on Ukrainian proceedings; you get what you pay for. 
 

More importantly, anyone who doesn’t see evidence for impeachment and removal (Romney) only needs to visit the southern border.  Adding to the NY mayor and governor’s pleadings, now the dim governor of AZ is demanding over $50billion to deal with the illegals.  Dereliction of duty and a threat to National security is enough. 

Apparently the GOP doesn't see evidence for impeachment, otherwise we'd have seen it and then an impeachment proceeding.  Thus far, we've only seen a clown show.

[Offthemat]

4 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

Apparently the GOP doesn't see evidence for impeachment, otherwise we'd have seen it and then an impeachment proceeding.  Thus far, we've only seen a clown show.

Some people wouldn’t recognize the truth if it was stuck between their teeth, or somewhere else.  Some people are scoundrels.  Some people have both properties. 

[WrestlingRasta]

1 hour ago, Plasmodium said:

Apparently the GOP doesn't see evidence for impeachment, otherwise we'd have seen it and then an impeachment proceeding.  Thus far, we've only seen a clown show.

Obviously they need to consult with Tucker a little more, get him more involved.

[Plasmodium]

3 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Obviously they need to consult with Tucker a little more, get him more involved.

Solid idea.   He could put together a video or do a live consultation with Alex Jones.

[Offthemat]

The T in TDS can stand for truth, for some. 

[WrestlingRasta]

29 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

The T in TDS can stand for truth, for some. 

On this, we can agree.

[Husker_Du]

51 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

On this, we can agree.

like climate change?

lmfao.

what a kook. 

[WrestlingRasta]

18 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

like climate change?

lmfao.

what a kook. 

You’ll have to direct me to anywhere on this site I have ever discussed climate change. 

[Paul158]

14 hours ago, VakAttack said:

Literally nobody is stopping them from investigating, and certainly nobody is making them, repeatedly claim they have evidence, and then when it's time to put up, they pee down their legs.  Is it likely a huge waste of taxpayer money to investigate nothing purely to prop up the ego of one 79 year old man-child and/or to pass modern GOP purity tests?  Yes, of course.  But who cares?  The Party of Limited Government and Cutting Government Waste continues their complete shift if philosophy!

Are you referring to the incontrovertible evidence Adam Schiff had for 5 years. I would bet you Adam is still claiming he had uncovered evidence about seditious and clandestine conspiracy.

[Paul158]

4 hours ago, Offthemat said:

Two words:  Kamela Harris. 

I thought it was Carmela Harris.

[Paul158]

29 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

You’ll have to direct me to anywhere on this site I have ever discussed climate change. 

I think was in the Smokers (meat ) thread in October. Something about an over cooked brisket. lol

[jross]

10 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

My question is - Does anybody care?  I don't see any pushback.  I certainly don't care.  If the GOP weren't so discombobulated, they would have already impeached him for Lord knows what.

I care.  

• Horrible performance with illegal immigration 
• Life is less affordable (insurance, food, products, energy, housing...)
• Bad global management with respect to money, war, policy
• Supports giving money to foreign countries that should not be spent or otherwise help in-nation
• Swamp leader

[Plasmodium]

2 minutes ago, jross said:

I care.  

• Horrible performance with illegal immigration 
• Life is less affordable (insurance, food, products, energy, housing...)
• Bad global management with respect to money, war, policy
• Supports giving money to foreign countries that should not be spent or otherwise help in-nation
• Swamp leader

He will be impeached for this?

[mspart]

At this point, who cares.   It's his last full year next year.   Of course it didn't stop the Ds now did it, so perhaps Biden should get impeached.    With a 50-50 split in the Senate, it is a fool's errand.   Nobody remembers Trump got impeached twice, but when they do, it was like what was the point.   No 2/3 majority Trump haters in the Senate so it was going nowhere.   Same with Biden.  I believe it will only have relevance in the election if Biden actually runs. 

mspart