Jump to content

Free the Lee - Unban the Dan edition: Should NJDan be unbanned?  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Should NJDan be allowed back into the fold?

    • Yes, he is harmless.
      20
    • God, no. How could you even think that?
      15


Recommended Posts

Posted

Contacting me via my personal FB profile (and not one of the mediums I have readily available on the web for contact - e-mail, Twitter, IG or the Mat Talk FB page) and then inquiring about being banned on the board while I'm actively working the World Championships is enough for me to never want to interact with him again. I make the mistake of trying to educate when I see a confused question on the board. But then the egg is on my face because I didn't realize it was another alias and when I present facts, my factual evidence is questioned with "if true" - sorry, not sorry he's not here. 

  • Fire 2

Insert catchy tagline here. 

Posted
17 hours ago, D3 for LU said:

... but the posters over on the Big Red wrestling forum all (AND sincerely) would love for you all to "encourage" him to come on over here.

No... I really mean it!

D3

 

It's like we sent him to summer camp and then moved without leaving a forwarding address.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 11/17/2022 at 10:27 AM, Wrestleknownothing said:

Let's start by stating the obvious.

NJDan is stubborn, obtuse, fractious, incapable of admitting error, and a bunch of other things. But, so what? While he can be a royal pain in the ass, he is not what I would consider a troll. As a matter of fact, he has some of the attributes that are often prized in discussion forums. He starts topics, he argues with everyone, he doubles down when wrong, but all in all he is pretty harmless.

So the question is, should NJDan be banned for being a pain in the ass? I am in the camp that he should not, but reasonable people might disagree. 

Besides, if we did not have him, who would we feel superior to?

It’s good to know that nearly 59% of the members of this forum believe in free speech.

NJDan also outpolled Trump’s tally in the Twitter poll by 6%. https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-twitter-poll-showing-narrow-majority-want-trump-reinstated-2022-11-20/

And Trump was, of course, reinstated.

Unlike Trump, NJDan was never accused of leading an insurrection. He was not, as far as I can tell, ever even accused of violating TheMat.com’s terms of service. He doe seem to have hurt a few feelings or aroused opposition along the way, but doesn’t that come with the territory?  So of course he should be reinstated.

Ironically, it’s the media type on this forum who seem most hostile to free speech. Hard to fathom.

  • Haha 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, NotElonMusk said:

It’s good to know that nearly 59% of the members of this forum believe in free speech.

NJDan also outpolled Trump’s tally in the Twitter poll by 6%. https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-twitter-poll-showing-narrow-majority-want-trump-reinstated-2022-11-20/

 

And Trump was, of course, reinstated.

 

 

Unlike Trump, NJDan was never accused of leading an insurrection. He was not, as far as I can tell, ever even accused of violating TheMat.com’s terms of service. He doe seem to have hurt a few feelings or aroused opposition along the way, but doesn’t that come with the territory?  So of course he should be reinstated.

Ironically, it’s the media type on this forum who seem most hostile to free speech. Hard to fathom.

 

Hi, NJDan!  How's that lawsuit coming?  Got any Cornell lawyers yet, or are they all too busy litigating Yianni's loss?

  • Fire 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NotElonMusk said:

It’s good to know that nearly 59% of the members of this forum believe in free speech.

NJDan also outpolled Trump’s tally in the Twitter poll by 6%. https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-twitter-poll-showing-narrow-majority-want-trump-reinstated-2022-11-20/

And Trump was, of course, reinstated.

Unlike Trump, NJDan was never accused of leading an insurrection. He was not, as far as I can tell, ever even accused of violating TheMat.com’s terms of service. He doe seem to have hurt a few feelings or aroused opposition along the way, but doesn’t that come with the territory?  So of course he should be reinstated.

Ironically, it’s the media type on this forum who seem most hostile to free speech. Hard to fathom.

 

Where's the Lysol?

  • Fire 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BigRedFan said:

Hi, NJDan!  How's that lawsuit coming?  Got any Cornell lawyers yet, or are they all too busy litigating Yianni's loss?

But how do we know that he is not Elon Musk.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted

If the devil doesn't go where he's not wanted, how bad can NJDan be? 

What is interesting is why is he so hellbent on getting back on here to post? The world is filled with places where you can shitpost to your heart's desire...

Posted
On 11/17/2022 at 3:55 PM, nhs67 said:

If DanTheMan is here, he will reply in this thread.

He will attempt to insert himself in to the decision making process.

Expect something ludicrous within the first 24 hours of the OP.  He lacks the strength or constitution to not be a Stoopid.

Happy Season 5 GIF by The Office

Posted
22 minutes ago, BobDole said:

Happy Season 5 GIF by The Office

It mist he fun watching thr MFer squirm beneath your boot.  Hahahahahaha

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

It mist he fun watching thr MFer squirm beneath your boot.  Hahahahahaha

Snuffed out a new name before he could even post today. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, BobDole said:

Snuffed out a new name before he could even post today. 

For some (sadistic?) reason that doesn't sound as entertaining?

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said:

Risky click of the night.

Good call. The link is to a Bing cached image - otherwise it could be risky.

I tried to edit the image to remove the link once I realized it was linked...

BUT I couldn't edit it because it was 16 minutes after I posted it. Aaaaargh.

 

Posted
It’s good to know that nearly 59% of the members of this forum believe in free speech.
NJDan also outpolled Trump’s tally in the Twitter poll by 6%. https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-twitter-poll-showing-narrow-majority-want-trump-reinstated-2022-11-20/

And Trump was, of course, reinstated.


Unlike Trump, NJDan was never accused of leading an insurrection. He was not, as far as I can tell, ever even accused of violating TheMat.com’s terms of service. He doe seem to have hurt a few feelings or aroused opposition along the way, but doesn’t that come with the territory?  So of course he should be reinstated.
Ironically, it’s the media type on this forum who seem most hostile to free speech. Hard to fathom.


I’ll never speak in the third person to talk about myself and another account. I have no problem with free speech. Never have. Thinking some people are toxic presences and not wanting them to continue to pollute a great community is an opinion I hold. People making this community their own personal litter box might be free speech, but those actions aren’t free of consequences …

Insert catchy tagline here. 

Posted

What if we had a go round and chipped in and bought him a lobster suit?

And he had to wear it while posting.

To prove that he was wearing it, he would be required to change his profile picture each time he posted to a new LobsterDan picture holding the current date and time.

I think I could get behind unbanning him with these reasonable safeguards in place.

Sensible policies for a happier message board!

Posted
15 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

It's hardly sporting.

You should let him get a few posts in and THEN ban him.

Get his hopes up before you dash them.

Much like Askren said on FRL yesterday, he likes to instill fear that you'll never win in the first match. If you give your opponent hope, he'll always have hope.

Posted
9 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

What if we had a go round and chipped in and bought him a lobster suit?

And he had to wear it while posting.

To prove that he was wearing it, he would be required to change his profile picture each time he posted to a new LobsterDan picture holding the current date and time.

I think I could get behind unbanning him with these reasonable safeguards in place.

Sensible policies for a happier message board!

I will personally cover the lobster suit.

  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...