Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, LJB said:

randon should make very light work in his match...

payton should handle his business, but, that maybe more heart than head...

the rest i am in agreement...

I agree entirely.

I am being (un)fairly vindictive.

Edited by nhs67
  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Mike Parrish said:

I agree, except for 57s.
Hedrick's a more competent and strategic wrestler.
 

I thought looking at the Open and WTT that Martinez looked to have caught up a bit.  I think it was like 6-4 or 5-4 last they wrestled?

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

I agree entirely.

I am being (un)fairly vindictive.

randon is gold...

i have nothing but respect for him...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
9 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Cenzo out according to Basch

 (check the comments)

He did the same thing last year.

I don't think he particularly cares about team camps nor does he care about the stipend.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, nhs67 said:

He did the same thing last year.

I don't think he particularly cares about team camps nor does he care about the stipend.

Which means that O'Toole can take the U23 spot without even wrestling for the National Team spot, thereby taking Ramirez' U23 spot.  At least last year Cardenas kept his U23 spot because the guy who could take it lost his true third match.

Them's the rules.

Posted
41 minutes ago, BigRedFan said:

Which means that O'Toole can take the U23 spot without even wrestling for the National Team spot, thereby taking Ramirez' U23 spot.  At least last year Cardenas kept his U23 spot because the guy who could take it lost his true third match.

Them's the rules.

Did Ramirez have the chance to enter the Open?

If he did - did he enter?

If he entered, did he compete?

If he competed, did he outplace O'Toole?

If he didn't, was it because he lost to O'Toole?

Did he lose to someone O'Toole beat?

Did he lose to someone that lost to someone that O'Toole beat?

Did he lose to someone that lost to someone that lost to someone that O'Toole beat?

Did he lose to someone that lost to someone that lost to someone that lost to someone that O'Toole beat?

Hint: It's the last one there.

He lost to Derek Gilcher 10-0 in the Consi of 8 #2 who beat Tommy Gantt in the Consi Quaters 9-4 who lost to Jake Shields 6-4 in the Consi Semis who lost to Kegan O'Toole (the same one who earned the spot) 10-2 for 3rd place at the US Open.

If Ramirez wanted the spot he should have outperformed O'Toole in the qualifying tournament that holds seniority.

 

  • Fire 2
  • Haha 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
40 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Did Ramirez have the chance to enter the Open?

If he did - did he enter?

If he entered, did he compete?

If he competed, did he outplace O'Toole?

If he didn't, was it because he lost to O'Toole?

Did he lose to someone O'Toole beat?

Did he lose to someone that lost to someone that O'Toole beat?

Did he lose to someone that lost to someone that lost to someone that O'Toole beat?

Did he lose to someone that lost to someone that lost to someone that lost to someone that O'Toole beat?

Hint: It's the last one there.

He lost to Derek Gilcher 10-0 in the Consi of 8 #2 who beat Tommy Gantt in the Consi Quaters 9-4 who lost to Jake Shields 6-4 in the Consi Semis who lost to Kegan O'Toole (the same one who earned the spot) 10-2 for 3rd place at the US Open.

If Ramirez wanted the spot he should have outperformed O'Toole in the qualifying tournament that holds seniority.

 

Get. A. Life.

  • Fire 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, BigRedFan said:

Get. A. Life.

It was a very thorough explanation. 🤔

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, LJB said:

It was a very thorough explanation. 🤔

Came here to say this as well.

Odd.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Came here to say this as well.

Odd.

on second thought...

it might just have been a very thorough explanation...

The Breakfast Club Idk GIF

  • Fire 1
Posted

i still prefer...

mewl

verb

(especially of a baby) cry feebly or querulously; whimper.

 

even if it is not a perfect fit it is literally all i hear...

Go Away Reaction GIF by Amy Lynn's Kitchen

Posted
3 hours ago, LJB said:

i still prefer...

mewl

verb

(especially of a baby) cry feebly or querulously; whimper.

 

even if it is not a perfect fit it is literally all i hear...

Go Away Reaction GIF by Amy Lynn's Kitchen

Oh that's word if the day tomorrow.  Promise.

  • Fire 1

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Formally140 said:

When the kids whinge, I tell them their recalcitrance is unappreciated and to shut it.  

Do you call them a womp when you do it?

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...