Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

would love to see numbers on this.

it may or may not be true... im not sure... 

I don’t have time to look up all the data… maybe @Wrestleknownothing has a chart for us 🙂 ? But a quick search shows we are headed in the right direction 

https://uww.org/article/wrestling-enjoys-record-viewership-world-champs-108-athletes-qualify-spots-olympic-games

https://uww.org/article/wrestling-scores-big-world-cships-706-percent-jump-engagements 

Posted
4 hours ago, billyhoyle said:

It changes the relative value of takedown compared to an escape or reversal. 

It changes the value relative to everything including turns

 

Posted
So, what does the board think about Wade Schalles' 'a point scored is a point earned' philosophy?

Wade champions this format but I don’t believe he came up with it. I’m behind most of what he suggests with some simplistic twists. Kyle and Andy broke down the results-based outcomes a few years ago on their On The Mat podcast.

If “duals don’t matter” then what’s the harm in simply changing how the team score is totaled?
  • Fire 1

Insert catchy tagline here. 

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, pokemonster said:

Are people really having Super Bowl-esque watch parties for NCAA wrestling? Honestly, I gave up trying to watch it live due to how much of a pain in the ass it was. Ended up finding a YouTube channel that illegally posted the matches a couple of hours later. 

I was part of a contingent of about 25 people that reserved a couple tables to watch semis at a bar…. 
 

I know there were many others. Many a HS/Club programs do big watch parties. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Fire 3
Posted
5 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I was part of a contingent of about 25 people that reserved a couple tables to watch semis at a bar…. 
 

I know there were many others. Many a HS/Club programs do big watch parties. 

Sounds like a good time. Used to watch with the fam but being in the south these days, no chance of getting a group together like that. They call it "wrasslin". 

Posted
17 hours ago, Mike Parrish said:

So, what does the board think about Wade Schalles' 'a point scored is a point earned' philosophy?

I prefer a compromise, where every point matters, utilizing a Margin of Victory formula, such that winning by 3 is worth a little more than winning by 1, and winning by 10 is worth a little more than a current major.  Hoping it increases action, especially late in the match.  Still 6 for a pin, 5 for a tech...but everything else is between 3.0 and 4.4, depending on your MOV (margin of victory).  OT win only 3, while a win by 14 is 4.4 (and a win by 8 is 3.8 etc).  We already use 1/2 points in tourney scoring, and with everything computerized, unsure why the fear of a decimal is so prevalent.  Gymnastics, diving and others use decimals.  One of the best benefits is essentially eliminating the dreaded dual meet tie-breaker.  Other proposed option to increase scoring is making the base win only 2 points, adding the margin of victory (0.1 to 1.4) and also adding the points scored by the winner (0.1 up to a max of 1.5 for scoring 15 or more---keeping the range from 2.2 to 4.9).  In this case, a 10-7 win is worth 3.3, while a 3-1 win is only 2.5.  Rewards action.  And would also prefer a forfeit being 7 or 8, but that is another debate.

Posted
1 hour ago, Jason Bryant said:

I don’t hate an MOV style (we discussed on Mat Stats), but just no no no on decimals. That isn’t something I can ever come around on.

I have to agree.

Scorers already routinely have difficulty with whole numbers.

I can't imagine just how awful the update to the Trackwrestling software would end up being.

Posted

Pin=30

Tech=25

Dec=10+MOV

… though a team with 3 wins by pin could win 90-77… but aren’t we looking to emphasize/reward scoring and pinning?

Posted
3 hours ago, Jason Bryant said:

I don’t hate an MOV style (we discussed on Mat Stats), but just no no no on decimals. That isn’t something I can ever come around on.

How do you feel about centimeters & millimeters?

.

Posted
17 hours ago, pokemonster said:

Sounds like a good time. Used to watch with the fam but being in the south these days, no chance of getting a group together like that. They call it "wrasslin". 

Yeah I hear ya. I’m in Florida. We’re trying. 

Posted
15 hours ago, DJT said:

Pin=30

Tech=25

Dec=10+MOV

… though a team with 3 wins by pin could win 90-77… but aren’t we looking to emphasize/reward scoring and pinning?

seems like a reasonable compromise to appease the decimalphobes.  only concern is modifying those bulb scoreboards on the walls of so many gyms that can only handle a "1" in the hundreds place (guess they never counted on hoopsters hitting 200), so the HS dual that ends up 210 to 205 could be tough to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Calli Gilchrist

    Choate Rosemary Hall, Connecticut
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Brown (Women)
    Projected Weight: 124

    Dean Bechtold

    Owen J. Roberts, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2026
    Committed to Lehigh
    Projected Weight: 285

    Zion Borge

    Westlake, Utah
    Class of 2026
    Committed to Army West Point
    Projected Weight: 133, 141

    Taye Wilson

    Pratt, Kansas
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Little Rock
    Projected Weight: 165, 174

    Eren Sement

    Council Rock North, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Michigan
    Projected Weight: 141
×
×
  • Create New...