Jump to content

B1G - Session 2, 3/4/23 5:30 PM (US-Eastern)


nhs67

Recommended Posts

Tournament Team Scores

2023 Big Ten Championships

Team Standings
  Team
Score
# F # Consi
Semi
# 3rd-4th # 5th-6th # 7th-8th Max
Possible
Penn State 120 6 2     1 176
Iowa 105.5 3 4     3 166.5
Nebraska 98.5 5 2       145.5
Ohio State 77 2 5       131.5
Minnesota 73 2 3     2 116.5
Michigan 64 1 4     2 110
Northwestern 64   7       123.5
Wisconsin 46.5 1 2     2 75.5
Purdue 36.5   3     1 65
Illinois 35.5   3     1 64
Rutgers 30   1     4 50.5
Indiana 27   1     2 41.5
Michigan State 27   2     1 47
Maryland 19.5   1     1 31

Note: Teams in RED have been mathematically eliminated from the team title race.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SocraTease said:

Tournament Team Scores

2023 Big Ten Championships

Team Standings
  Team
Score
# F # Consi
Semi
# 3rd-4th # 5th-6th # 7th-8th Max
Possible
Penn State 120 6 2     1 176
Iowa 105.5 3 4     3 166.5
Nebraska 98.5 5 2       145.5
Ohio State 77 2 5       131.5
Minnesota 73 2 3     2 116.5
Michigan 64 1 4     2 110
Northwestern 64   7       123.5
Wisconsin 46.5 1 2     2 75.5
Purdue 36.5   3     1 65
Illinois 35.5   3     1 64
Rutgers 30   1     4 50.5
Indiana 27   1     2 41.5
Michigan State 27   2     1 47
Maryland 19.5   1     1 31

Note: Teams in RED have been mathematically eliminated from the team title race.

This is pretty good proof that nebraska will do better than Iowa in ncaas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. PeanutButter said:

I suppose Kerk must finally be healthy. Cass had nothing for him

 

You are probably pretty close to the truth here. The healthier Kerkvliet gets the better lean muscle he puts on, the wider the gap gets between him and Cassioppi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Huskers 5 for 5. Too bad nobody on here would have predicted that.

The 6 horses 🐎 yes the Pinto may have flamed out a bit in this one but he'll be in the mix for the next stampede.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, russelscout said:

Keeps it too close. I don’t have a ton of faith in Mannings guys at Nattys. Seems like historically they have underachieved. Robb just has the look of someone who will go down in the quarters.

And the dumbest comment of the night goes to you!! Nebraska is constantly wrestling above their seeds at ncaas. Iowa constantly underachieving 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jajensen09 said:

This is pretty good proof that nebraska will do better than Iowa in ncaas

Slow down there buddy. I'm happy for you since Nebraska fans rarely have anything to celebrate but it doesn't take too many brain cells to figure out that the bigger field at NCAAs changes things significantly. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CHROMEBIRD said:

Be that as it may, Manning's guys are easy to root for. All humble men of good character in their post-match interviews. 

Great to see you on the boards again.

Could really see them coming home with 2nd place trophy at ncaas. And be even deeper next year 👀 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. PeanutButter said:

Slow down there buddy. I'm happy for you since Nebraska fans rarely have anything to celebrate but it doesn't take too many brain cells to figure out that the bigger field at NCAAs changes things significantly. 

Exactly numb nuts!! All these brands, Assad, teske duct tape boys will score very little for Iowa.  Nebraska has 5 potential finalists. Iowa can't say that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jajensen09 said:

Exactly numb nuts!! All these brands, Assad, teske duct tape boys will score very little for Iowa.  Nebraska has 5 potential finalists. Iowa can't say that 

If the over/under on Husker finalists at NCAA’s was 1.5,  90% of the money would be on the under.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Perry said:

Agree 100% refs look at calling stalling just prior as an excuse to not call oob stall properly. My biggest issue with a straight push out rule is marrying that idea with an escape. Say wrestler a earns an escape at the oob line and immediately gets shoved out. I don't think that should be a stall call otherwise it incentivizes top guy to wrestle near the line. 

I hereby deputize you to figure out a way to word the rule to account for that situation.  Because something has to be done.  How many matches are going to be marred by the stalling problem tomorrow and then in Tulsa?  Everyone knows that the answer is a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...