Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I read you the first time. 

Well to be fair to @Bigbrog, you did specifically refer to “guys in here.”  I checked briefly and the only people I saw “bagging” on WNBA players were @Bigbrog and @Offthemat.  If you’re not saying @Bigbrog did it, then who are you saying did it?

Posted
26 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Well to be fair to @Bigbrog, you did specifically refer to “guys in here.”  I checked briefly and the only people I saw “bagging” on WNBA players were @Bigbrog and @Offthemat.  If you’re not saying @Bigbrog did it, then who are you saying did it?

Your ocd has risen to troll level boss.  

  • Wrestle +1 1
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Well to be fair to @Bigbrog, you did specifically refer to “guys in here.”  I checked briefly and the only people I saw “bagging” on WNBA players were @Bigbrog and @Offthemat.  If you’re not saying @Bigbrog did it, then who are you saying did it?

A) if you are going to refer to what I ‘specifically’ referred to, why did you leave out the “and everywhere” part of my post when quoting me? 🤔

2) I didn’t name anyone directly, that is not the point of my opinion to name anyone directly.  You can have your silly little arguments without me. I’m just expressing opinions and viewpoints here. I have no interest in “winning” anonymous internet arguments. 
 

Clear it up for you?

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Also an interesting response. 

Yawn

unless you have an opinion on bag on wnba gate your participation isn’t necessary 

Edited by Caveira
  • Wrestle +1 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

A) if you are going to refer to what I ‘specifically’ referred to, why did you leave out the “and everywhere” part of my post when quoting me? 🤔

2) I didn’t name anyone directly, that is not the point of my opinion to name anyone directly.  You can have your silly little arguments without me. I’m just expressing opinions and viewpoints here. I have no interest in “winning” anonymous internet arguments. 
 

Clear it up for you?

Doesn’t change the fact that you still said “people in here” though.    I was agreeing with you.  I do think it’s funny the guy that first whined about it was actually one of the ones doing it.  

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Doesn’t change the fact that you still said “people in here” though.    I was agreeing with you.  I do think it’s funny the guy that first whined about it was actually one of the ones doing it.  

Why does it even matter?   And why won’t you show what the bagging was.  Are you afraid it won’t look like bagging and that your just going to far as per usual?

me thinks your just trying to deflect from the fact that the wnba can’t define a woman or defend their position.   

Edited by Caveira
Posted
40 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Yawn

unless you have an opinion on bag on wnba gate your participation isn’t necessary 

Also very interesting, coming from the 200+ post a week, what about king of the board.  
 

You are entertaining, for sure. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I’m just expressing opinions and viewpoints here. 

Bahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahaha 

  • Wrestle +1 1

LIVING the dream in the GREATEST COUNTRY on the planet!!!!

Posted
51 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Also very interesting, coming from the 200+ post a week, what about king of the board.  
 

You are entertaining, for sure. 

It’s really not a lot of time boss.  Just entertainment value.  
 

you seem extra judgy this week.  Slow week?

  • Wrestle +1 1
Posted (edited)

200 posts x 30 seconds per post (extremely long for a post) = 6000 seconds divided by 60 equals 100 minutes which equals 1 hour and 40 minutes of posting for the week.  Hmmmmmmmm 

I flunked math so someone check my work but 200 posts for the week really isn’t a lot if you want to be “king of the board”

Edited by JimmySpeaks

LIVING the dream in the GREATEST COUNTRY on the planet!!!!

Posted
17 hours ago, Caveira said:

In your best super friends accent.  

meanwhile….. back at 103.5s and tprptptpt’s basement 

 

 

These aren’t the only 2 choices the WNBA have.  You’re dumb.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Caveira said:

So which button do you push ?

Neither.  They can very easily say that trans women are women while not allowing all (or even any) trans women to play in the league.  It would not be a gotcha, no matter how much you want it to be.

Edited by 1032004
Posted
8 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Neither.  They can very easily say that trans women are women while not allowing all (or even any) trans women to play in the league.  It would not be a gotcha, no matter how much you want it to be.

Not without re writing their charter.  It says all women.   They’re going to get sued and lose and the left is going to have to admit their definition is dumb and not founded in science 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Not without re writing their charter.  It says all women.   They’re going to get sued and lose and the left is going to have to admit their definition is dumb and not founded in science 

Pretty sure it doesn’t say “all women”, just that only women can play in the league.  Women on steroids can not, for example.  Or even more innocently, women need to pass a team physical.  Not passing a physical doesn’t mean you’re not a woman. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...