WrestlingRasta

What I did was…..led you onto facts that you could make the effort to look up for yourself and be more informed, if you so choose (freedom of information and all). What you are doing is saying no, you refuse to, you expect me to do the work to acquire that information (which I already have before forming opinions on the topic), and then hand it over to you. I will simply ask you what that is typical of….as I am not one to make assumptions about others affiliations simply because they disagree with me on one particular statement I made.

I mean….

. I’m not playing that stupid little game. I’ll just say this: No. I do not go about hoping some stranger just believes another stranger on social media. To be informed means to do the work. I think we’re pretty clear here. You know it and I know it.

If you are talking to me, try some reading comprehension first and then maybe we can continue. I’m going to help you out with the first couple steps: There’s your first clue. Here’s your second: Would you like to try again?

you disagree with me so pull out the “Fox News” stuff, so that you don’t have to address the fact you don’t want to learn more about where you’re wrong. Another one of those emotional ticks. Obviously there’s a lot more you need educated on. Most of people on here will tell you I’m not exactly the “Fox News” crowd. Another thing they will tell you is I’m not interested in having a stranger believe something they heard from another stranger on social media, I’m more interested in getting people to take some time and effort to seek out accurate information themselves. But I do realize it’s safer and more comfortable to just say ”No I know I’m right”, so that you don’t have to put yourself through that.

So you’re not interested in taking 30 minutes to learn a little more about it, it’s safer and more comfortable to just say….‘basically I’m right’. I didn’t ask if it was exception or majority I specifically asked if you were interested in taking 30 minutes to educate yourself a little more. “Spend on themselves and their maids”. . No need to get emotional. It’s a discussion. I think we’ve seen all we need to see here.

How much it would take to take care of the poor has nothing to do with my response to you, and the statement of yours I quoted. Since you made the statement that all “the rich do is stash their money away and passed it on to their kids”, I will repeat the same question. Is that something you are interested in addressing, or do you not care to because it may go against your idea?

You have a tendency to group a large number of people into one characteristic. Would it interest you to take thirty minutes to research the amount of charitable donations that are provided by ‘the rich’ each year? Or how about the amount ‘the rich’ reinvest into other ventures each year, ventures that create more jobs, goods, and services. Serious question, are you at all interested in educating yourself in those areas?

Not a big fan of this mentality. The Uber rich are so because they put themselves in a position to hire others, or acquire a lot of money through their services or entertainment. In doing so, they are providing our society with services, goods, products, entertainment, etc.

Story about five years old, but the kind of thing that comes up around election time. She was asked her thoughts on the subject in an interview back in '19, and she said that she had a hard time criminalizing natural human behavior that isn't hurting anyone outside of (possibly) the two consenting adults engaging. One of few things I've heard her say that I agree with. I have a hard time with natural human behavior that doesn't hurt anyone, being criminal. I also feel like if it were legal, regulated (allowed in brothel's and such and not out on the street), then it would have a good impact on the heroin and meth and other hard drugs that prostitutes get involved in.

Just messin with ya. But I am curuous….my hypothetical?

TDS!!

Got me thinking, he had to go through those three bad ass dudes, all three who wrestle completely differently, and he wasn’t the savy veteran fighting off the new crop (i.e. JB vs Dake; Taylor; etc)……he had to run them down. He found ways to out wrestle all three and run the table on them. That’s a bad ass dude.

His wins over chamizo too.

He’s literally quoting what the person spoke of on video against this bill. That was one of the main points (in the video) for them being against the bill…..

My stalker can’t help but follow me and chime in even when he has absolutely nothing to say. His need for attention is kinda cute, isn’t it?

Oh you’re talking about where I wrote about the conversation I had yesterday morning at work. So what you’re saying to me is that even though you were not at all involved in those different conversations throughout those fours days, you’re resting on the fact that you know those people’s perceptions and where they are coming from in their views. Got it. That is a nice and safe way to think when you don’t want your own ideas challenged. I’ll give you that.

I’m not following?

No…parks, recreation, programming, etc.

South Florida. But what I say above doesn’t just come from my home community (although obviously carrying heavy weight)….I’m around a bit.

To be fair, I typed “John Hopkins’s eligibility billion donation” and got the answer in the first page. Thats less words than it took for you to type out your hypothetical issue with the situation. Not exactly in depth research, just a minimal amount of effort to answer your question, instead of first reaction to be to find a problem with a situation I don’t even know if exists. just sayin….

Please clarify

That (and associated programs), along with school topics, is what I hear most.

One? Easy....community parks.