WrestlingRasta

Someone is still spazzing and still can't comprehend what they are reading.

Your bolded part was me referring to your response to me this morning, not your responses to me yesterday before everything seemingly came about being offended and due to feels. In your responses to me this morning you addressed nothing in the points I made, other than claiming that you laughed at the LA Clippers example because you agreed with it, but instead open some can of worms about being offended and all up in feelings. Housing discrimination due to race is not a lens I 'choose' to view anything, it is recognizing the fact, that he was found liable for it, and then repeated the practice after being liable for it, and it is just one example of racism. Recognizing comments and actions from someone is not choosing to view through a chosen lens, it is simple recognition. In fact I would argue denying it happened or pretending like it didn't happen is exactly that....viewing through a chosen lens. If you don't agree with that, so be it.

I read it, I'm not sure your point in telling me to re-read it.

You will have to be more specific, I responded to more than one post here to you and others. What are you saying still holds true?

How was I not civil? I am not sure how you took that as being offended. I didn't call any names, I didn't get personal. You opened the door with people "like you", so I walked through that door and responded to it. And certainly didn't say anything about 'getting into your feels'. I think it goes to show that I am "equal opportunity" as you stated, but whether or not you like what I am saying dictates where you are going to claim my comments come from. You have nothing to say about the points I was making, but are instead responding with 'feels' and being offended at a different perspective. Maybe take a look in the mirror? Or not. Whatever works for you.

The video is worthless. You can’t even see his cell. You can only see a small section of a path to walk to his cell. Never mind there is mysteriously an entire minute cut out of the video. This is classic stuff, much like the ‘magic bullet’. Just throw it out there and say it’s proof. Doesn’t matter that it’s not at all proof, as long as it can’t be 100% cut and dry disproven (although the ‘magic bullet’ pretty much can), just throw it out there and let it be another grand American conspiracy mystery. All of the players will go unharmed. What’s sad is this deals with kids. One man is dead, a woman is in prison for the rest of her life. But “well, nothing to see here”. And the media isn’t even supposed to ask about it anymore.

How did I change the topic? Using an example of the LA Clippers to explain what I was talking about?? I don’t have a requirement to state evidence, I don’t know why people act like this anonymous message opinion board operates as a court of law. I just stated there are plenty of examples of it. But to play along: settling lawsuits for housing discrimination, and then getting sued again for continuing the same practices after the settlement, could certainly be argued as evidence. That was a while ago. More recently, lying to the American people about the set up with the El Salvador prison, which has now been proven by the testimony of the Slavadorian gov’t, which included lies about minorities deported there who weren’t supposed to be and/or shouldn’t have been deported, certainly can be argued as evidence. That’s just two examples on the opposite ends of 50 years, and there are plenty of examples in between that could certainly be argued as evidence.

Well, there certainly is evidence, going all the way back to the 70’s, voting results and some policy decisions aside. Powerful people can certainly do things “for” minorities, but for their own personal gain, having personal disdain for said minorities. Ever hear about the LA Clippers??

Again, to be fair, he didn’t say everyone knows it either. I think he’s being a stoop with how he started this thread as well, but at least stick with what was and was not said. It just carries better than just making stuff up. Thats on the level of how this thread was started.

One of the more reasonable posts on this board.

I mean, to be fair, it’s not like politicians aren’t manipulating for their own good, and it’s not like voting automatically makes you intelligent. Many, many people of all races and parties vote for that which is not in their best interest, because they fall for manipulation.

Four replies in five minutes off the same post. Tell us more about tears and spazzing. Have a nice evening, maybe overnight your balls will drop.

I figured as much, no balls and back tracking. But this can be a lesson for you, on two fronts. 1). Reading comprehension, it literally can do you wonders. To go along with that 2) have even just a little bit of a clue what you are talking about if you’re going to bring such a comment into a conversation where it is completely irrelevant. As you obviously are now aware after going back to look, which would explain why you were too chicken s**t to back up your comment, I did not say in there it was recently, I didn’t give any mention to time what so ever. It was a year and a half ago. So your ’so soon after’ just simply does not apply, which we know you realize now, because for the first time you suddenly want to avoid the topic instead of keep spouting your little playground remarks. Next time do a little better with that third grade brain, and maybe you won’t bring something into where it doesn’t belong, while making such an ass of yourself.

Oh, I must have been mistaken by your starting a thread titled "we didn't kill enough Indians" and then attributing said comment to a group of people without even mentioning the person who actually said it. My bad.

I'm missing the part of the quote that says 'didn't kill enough'

In my revisiting my thread on downsizing, I couldn't help but wonder if me mentioning the passing of my wife is what you meant by this comment, since you took such issue with me, by god daring to, mention a weekend get away with a lady. Would this be accurate?

Maybe the "advice on staying safe online among internet creeps" thread would be a more appropriate place for such an opinion? Anyway...new development. Work started on the empty lot next door to clear and elevate this morning. We tried to buy the lot when we bought the house, but the purchasing agent on the last sale said it was owned by folks in Germany and they are not selling, intend to build. Looks like there are going to be some new European neighbors. May factor into these decisions, old dudes in speedos will take away from the view a little bit.

You're probably better off just attributing this comment solely to the person who said it. Ann Coulter is her own special kinda stupid.

Well, it’s actually a temporary injunction toward one small aspect of the bill affecting only one entity impacted by said one aspect of the bill. It’s not a block on the entire bill. And just about every President has had agenda items work though Congress only to have the courts say hold on a minute, let’s take a look at this. Checks and balances are a key component to what makes this the greatest country in the world.

I don’t have TikTok, maybe that’s why I’m directed to lawn mower guy. But from jross’ post it doesn’t sound real. At least, that particular person. Similar scenarios are certainly real

The link goes to a dude mowing an elderly ladie’s lawn…????

Definitely some chin needing wiped in this thread. Ooof.

Because it would open the door to their own implications. You agreed with it above, the things they would rather have happen than risk their own individual power.

Your like of balls to not back up your s**t talk is not a surprise. Run run little fella.