Jump to content

WrestlingRasta

Members
  • Posts

    4,842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by WrestlingRasta

  1. Seriously speaking, you should do a real dive (data driven, not social media or news media driven) into how much California contributes to the federal government annually, vs how much many of the “red states” receive from the federal government annually. Not making an argument, just a suggestion regarding information.
  2. @Wrestleknownothing…..you’re up!
  3. Junior Gold and Silver, U23 bronze. This while spending 70% of the time focusing on folk while the rest of the world spends 100% of the time focusing on free......
  4. Yesterday the governmental affairs committee invoked the rarely utilized "rule of five" law, which in short, requires the justice department to turn over everything, everything, they have on the Epstein/Maxwell cases to Congress for review, with names and personal information of the victims redacted. Doesn't mean it automatically will happen, the DOJ could try to block it and as is expected there will be some legal battles played out in the courts before it were to happen. Question is....why would the DOJ block it, particularly with the order saying the names and personal information of the victims be redacted? And if they do.....well that would be very interesting. We shall see how the DOJ responds. As it stands they have until August 15 to comply, and have to August 25 to schedule a briefing to the committee by August 25.
  5. Kash Patel in his short time on his new job has proven to be one of the most reliable trustworthy government officials ever!!
  6. Wow. Woops. That didn’t work out so well
  7. You may not have known who she was….but “Big T” sure did. Have a good night. PS- you may be gearing your question to the wrong person. I haven’t mentioned “Fda guy” once (reading comprehension..)
  8. I’m not sure who you are referring to. There were many that she influenced “Big T” into not getting or keeping the job. Are you referring to all of them, or are you just focusing on one that makes you feel better about your failed argument. She was in “Big T”s ear quite a bit. Kind of like you focused on her one post with 480 engagements, when there are plenty with 20-30-40-50k engaged within 25 hours to choose from. Cherry picking helps you feel better. I get it.
  9. It’s kinda of ironic you think someone that “Big T” listens to closely has no impact. I mean, it is “Big T” after all…he’s pretty important!
  10. On your opinion/view of rational? Again, I’m not making any debate about Laura Loomer (I stated that earlier…the whole reading comprehension thing comes up again). I simply stated that in five hours she got tens of thousands of engagements on each of a number of posts, showing you that your numbers and insinuation are inaccurate, and then since you brought up it was the same as the guy from San Antonio, I was pointing out to you that the guy from San Antonio was not an advisor to the President of the United States, such as the case with Loomer. I do believe she is a knucklehead, or crack pot as you say…but that doesn’t mean I’m going to deny truths about her or just make *I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* up to make myself feel better about a failed argument. That’s my opinion of rationale. We can disagree.
  11. Same thing? I guess I didn’t realize that guy in San Antonio was an advisor to the President of the United States. My bad. I guess I blew that one….
  12. . I wasn’t making any of the arguments you are claiming, I was just simply showing you are incorrect with your numbers and what you were trying to insinuate. This is what we get when we have someone who is simply incapable of saying, okay I blew that one, so instead reverts back to third grade emotional rants. We can see why you and Jimmy get along so well. But you’ll be okay, you’re a little further ahead. A little… PS- what is this infatuation with ‘boss’
  13. Guiferre specifically said regarding Trump that he was around but he was not one that assaulted her. There have been accusations on Trump, but she’s not one of them.
  14. Maybe if they chose to live an honest life and a hard working living they wouldn’t be criminals, and they wouldn’t live in poverty.
  15. The number of times he just destroyed big nasty linemen and linebackers who tried to tackle him, then outran defensive backs........but it was a shoestring tackle that ended his career.
  16. But did she walk out alone?????
  17. If you spelled it in your search anywhere near the way you spelled it here, you're looking at the wrong person. Then when you get the right person, re check your numbers. Numerous posts today, that have numbers like 14k, 21k, 24k, 43k, and so on, and these are from just a few posts in the last five hours....
  18. Who said anything about the beer?
  19. Something we all can appreciate….
  20. Not saying it isn't a condition presented by some.......RV for example. However, if the phrase were only used in such situations, it would be so much easier to only associate it that way. But since it is used any time someone dare have a critique of......"Big T", I'll continue to associate it the way it actually relates, particularly here on this forum.
  21. No, I don't subscribe to the belief we have some unaccountable secret organization.......I just laugh at how easy and convenient it is to throw around "TDS" anytime someone doesn't like what is being said. Kind of like throwing around racism at every possible turn even when it doesn't relate in any way, you throw it around enough and it loses all credibility and just looks silly.
×
×
  • Create New...