Jump to content

WrestlingRasta

Members
  • Posts

    3,301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by WrestlingRasta

  1. Well….I didn’t document anything, in any court of law, let alone mischaracterize anything in a court of law, regarding Tucker. So you’re going to have to try again.
  2. Speaking of studying, have you solved that whole “who is the head of the executive branch” puzzle yet?
  3. I guess to answer that question, you’ll have to point to where I said something ‘Tucker said’. All I said was I don’t give anything he says much weight. That wasn’t a very good effort. Try again.
  4. Oh I’ve studied plenty. I think where maybe I differ from some in this thread is that I don’t give a lot of weight to anything Tucker is presenting. It’s been well beyond documented as to why no one should. Granted that was in court of law, not Twitter,….but still.
  5. Two questions: 1)Where did I say the investigation said they did ‘great job’? 2) To go back to the basic civics questions being discussed in the other thread, here is a good, very basic fundamental question in regards to our form of government: What branch of government is responsible for law enforcement, and who is the top elected official of that branch? Study up and learn the answer to that question, and that will help you come to the answer you seek.
  6. Well….the people who have in fact actually gone back and investigated, and the testimony and evidence (in large majority from Republican officials) that seems to have come about from the investigation, points to what went wrong was the person at the head of the branch responsible for law enforcement at the time
  7. Bringing in Kushner means they’ve worked their way up to the tip top, right at the right hip of Trump. Two questions I have about this development. 1) Did they get him to talk about the investment from the Saudi Sovereign fund; 2) who indicts first..Willis in GA or Smith in DC? https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jared-kushner-could-deliver-trumps-202845828.html
  8. I almost thought you were writing a sincere post until you got to the last post. Are you providing us with your perception of those with student loans? Or someone particular you know that rubs you the wrong way?? I mean yeah there are some certainly irresponsible people out there, But really? And what about those who have student loans, AND, don’t get refunds at the end of the year? How is your plan to manage those accounts, There are a lot of them…. And then finally, when MAGA breaks up and defunds the IRS….then what?
  9. Why would you forgive the money they actually borrowed and only keep in the part that keeps making other people more money?
  10. Appreciate the effort, but…
  11. I took a shot at reading through it, and I relatively suck when it comes to figuring this type of shit out. But it seems to me that, in laymans terms, that basics of this plan is that, people are not being forgiven any of the amount they borrowed, they're going to pay back what they borrowed, many will just not being paying as much more in interest and fees as a lot of us have paid in the past. Can someone who does understand this, and doesn't have a defiant bias one way or the other left or right, tell me if that's in the ballpark, and explain what I'm missing?
  12. ‘Just use Google for the proof’…. Is not quite the concrete it’s thought to be.
  13. /\ yeah that’s what led us to talking about it at work this morning. You have to wonder how many times throughout the last 50 years coke, weed, other drugs the SS has stumbled across and we never heard anything about it. What makes this one so special?
  14. I mean, you had me until: if you’re not educated enough at 18 yrs old to understand the contract, probably not a good idea to further your education. other than that, agree for the most part.
  15. There’s enough people starting discussion about it to conclude…..yeah, apparently.
  16. Was talking to guy this morning at work and started wondering if there even ever was any coke. Just more smoke and mirrors for something. This surely isn't the first time SS found coke or some kind of drugs in the WH. Never hear SS talk about it befor, But this oner they sure are giving a lot of attention.
  17. When it comes to federally legal vs state, it has to do more than just the cops enforcing it. There’s issues on the business side of things that it makes a difference. When I go to dispensary it’s cash only, because the banks won’t deal in marijuana money because they are federally regulated. When you are a cash only business that brings in extra security items that need to be addressed, etc.
  18. To be fair there’s a whole lot of questions being thrown out that are more issue questions, not civics questions. But the idea of a test is a fantasy anyway so
  19. Explain the three branches of government and how each : has the authority to check the others, and is absent in authority to interject in the others.
  20. We can certainly do a play on words for everyone’s fun. I’m sure different sources will have a variation of the words federal, constitutional, Democratic, and republic. To be specifically technical we are a federal democratic republic, as established by its constitution.
  21. Gotcha, thanks. I was confused.
  22. First thing for me would be test understanding of bill or rights.
×
×
  • Create New...