Offthemat

Obliviously unburdened.

Border barriers?

Reading about the mountain men, it was said that while they prized an elk steak, mountain lion was an absolute delicacy.

Pot fulls?

Look at the language in the pro-abortion bills. They don’t want any restrictions or guidelines. Even in Europe, abortions after about 15 weeks are strongly regulated.

Impaired thinking might cause one to reflect that pointing out that a hostile media makes no similar claim that Mark Penn is in any way connected to, or working for, Donald Trump, as approval of the media. It’s quite the opposite. It’s saying your own teammates aren’t saying what you say. Mark Penn is a dedicated democrat, but he’s more honest than most.

This will have a greater effect:

There are good people on both sides?

Not really concerned.

I’d say the claim has already been made, and a call for investigation by another non-biased source, with some substantiation in the works.

That’s the claim. You can keep shooting the messenger, I’m going to wait.

Guess there’s no need to wait for any developments, no need to investigate, we’ve got all the evidence we need. Right?

There’s a number of large media outlets that are reporting on this and you’re the only one claiming he’s connected to Trump.

What self respecting numbskull would use wikipeedia without including reports from the SPLC and the DNC?

Mark Penn calls for investigation Mark Penn, former advisor to Bill and Hillary Clinton, has also called for an internal investigation by ABC News into the perceived bias of the debate moderators. Penn suggested an independent review of the moderators' texts and emails to determine if there was any effort to "rig the outcome" of the debate. He criticised the media coverage as "laughable" and highlighted the need for impartiality in future debates. https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/debate-fallout-trump-accuses-abc-news-of-bias-as-harris-campaign-pushes-for-rematch-mark-penn-calls-for-investigation/ar-AA1quaxP

There are lots of places where the cops won’t answer calls unless the crime is serious and in progress. To make a worthless report, you have to go to the station.

Garland was described as a ‘moderate’ when he was nominated for the Supreme Court. With moderates like him, we don’t need fascists.

They could have made it less obvious.

And right on cue, #portajohn:

Your view is that civics and patriotism are political? Extremism? You can’t pull a political sentence out of that article.