Offthemat

Your cite only says “recommended.”

But do you agree that someone could truthfully say that he hasn’t been disbarred, because, well, he hasn’t been?

We’re likely to end up with a different climate in every yard. What about the people who live in apartments?

A recommendation for a thing is the thing. That’s your position?

I notice that you include the qualification “if they’re charged with a crime.” While waiting for your reply, John Yoo was on saying that illegal immigrants do not get the same level of due process, and not the same “beyond reasonable doubt” requirement for criminal trials of citizens. So, are you saying that they only get a limited amount of due process for immigration status proceedings?

Is a disbarment recommendation the same as a disbarment?

What’s the case that says this?

What are the odds that some city official owns the maintenance company that gets the contract for these jobs?

We’ll need to come to a consensus.

Now if we can all just agree on what climate we desire.

No, I hadn’t heard that. Maybe you can provide a link to that information.

Incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial.

But there is a predatory incursion.

Truth is, they ruled that he should be deported, just not to El Salvador. Which can be easily mended.

Are you a mormon? You don’t have to have a law degree to have an opinion on a legal issue. Lawyers disagree on matters of law all the time. Look at @VakAttack He tends to agree with Lawrence Tribe and thinks that Donald Trump is always guilty of something, I tend to agree with Jonathon Turley and John Eastman, Trump is sometimes, often times, right.

I know that the withholding is of the removal and not the order. Withholding based on conditions - the conditions have changed - the order is in effect.

Not a problem - it can be done in absentia.

Clearly, you’re projecting. I listed a few of the points indicating that the man has had due process, you, a lawyer, have claimed he had none.

Saying this is ridiculous. Doing it is far from upholding the constitution. Trump, not be a lawyer, is following the law. There is no co-equal commander-in-chief. Your hero had two judges say he was ms13, and another deny his fraudulent asylum application. He was under a final order of removal, but was granted an errant withholding of removal order. Withholding as in - until conditions change. Well, conditions changed. How much due process do you want these illegals to have? To a point, certainly not to the extent a citizen might expect. We’re going to call it a class action (in reverse) due process.

That’s an odd thing to say, as the law in use is from the very beginnings of this nation. Shirley you’ll eventually get something right.

You don’t understand what the majority of the country is saying. We were against the Biden immigration policy all along. Due process for illegal immigrants is short and sweet. You entered this country illegally, it’s time to leave, one way or another. Every one of you.

This is entirely wrong. You should read the finding before you comment on it.

A rancher near here uses llamas to protect his herd from coyotes, wonder if they work for wolves?

My wife says dynadasies are hard to grow.