Offthemat

I’ve already listened to too much Gavin Newsum. Time I won’t get back.

Jazz hands?

No problem.

ADD?

Antifa is just an idea.

Unresponsive. Anything about links?

Kind of like efficiency ex-spurts. They have to find something to justify their pay.

What would you know about contractors and fulfilling contracts?

Trump is not a thief, therefore there is nothing to say about that. We can talk about your lies, or we can talk about red robster's lies. Right now we're talking about red robster's.

SECRET MEETING OPENS FLOODGATES ON TRUMP/RUSSIA HOAX &nbsp ““You look back at what was going on in the FBI starting in 2016 [with] these cases [and] the way they approached Gen. [Michael] Flynn; Crossfire Hurricane; the Russian ‘collusion’ case [prosecuted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller]; then moving to the raid on Mar-a-Lago [and] the [DOJ] lawfare that came after President Trump, this is outrageous. And then you had the arrogance of these two individuals – Comey and Brennan – it was unbelievable,” former FBI special-agent-in-charge Jody P. Weis, a 22-year veteran of the bureau, said in a recent interview. “So I’m extremely happy that someone is looking into this.”“ https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/07/16/exclusive_secret_meeting_opens_document_floodgates_on_trumprussia_hoax_1123108.html

I’ll go along with that.

Sure. Let me have your link to Uranium One, too. This one’s for you, Bud: https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2025/07/16/exclusive_secret_meeting_opens_document_floodgates_on_trumprussia_hoax_1123108.html

How many pet rocks do you have? I’m still looking for a gold one.

Yep, I can’t think of anything, either.

How do they do that? It doesn’t even make sense. Build on the coast accounting for it being under water? Piers and boat stalls instead of parking lots?

Being an expert scientist and all, can you tell me what good a climatologist has ever done for anybody? I mean, with all the warnings of oceans rising, highly intelligent people like Obama is still buying and building waterfront properties, evidently not paying any attention to what the climatologists say, so what good are they?

This better describes Biden. This is idiocy.

Remember all those jobs you got fired from when you didn’t do what the boss asked you to do? They weren’t asks, either.

It’s not a critique of past practices, it’s a plan for future applications, with some references to experiences from information collected from refugee camps in the past. That’s what the footnotes are, like always, references. Some, but not all, of the references are from refugee camp experiences. You even conveniently left out the preceding paragraph, which contains this phrase: “The shielding approach is an ambitious undertaking, which may prove effective in preventing COVID-19 infection among high-risk populations if well managed. While the premise is based on mitigation strategies used in the United Kingdom“ “May prove effective” is not a reference to the past, and where are the refugee camps in the United Kingdom? You could have just said “yes.”

So it’s not a plan? It’s just an outline of what to plan for when you make the plan? There’s no denying that some form of punishment and/or quarantine was finding favor at that time, especially among dimocrats. Timeline considerations Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months. Other logistical considerations Consideration: Plan to identify additional resources and outline supply chain mechanisms to support green zones. Social/Cultural/Religious Practices Consideration: Plan for potential disruption of social networks.

You could have started with making a point.

The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide “The plan’s authors were unnamed but included 26 footnotes. It was completely official. The document was only removed on about March 26, 2023. During the entire intervening time, the plan survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy. It was called “Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.” By absence of empirical data, the meaning is: nothing like this has ever been tried. The point of the document was to map out how it could be possible and alert authorities to possible pitfalls to be avoided. The meaning of “shielding” is “to reduce the number of severe Covid-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (‘high-risk’) and the general population (‘low-risk’). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector, or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.” In other words, this is what used to be concentration camps.“ https://brownstone.org/articles/the-cdc-planned-quarantine-camps-nationwide/

FIFY

That’s not football.