Jump to content

Interviewed_at_Weehawken

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,855

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Interviewed_at_Weehawken

  1. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    What is your terminology for what they call the "Blair ride?" I think NFHS materials also call it that.
  2. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    "Where's Dave?" "He had to drive Kurt Vonnegut home."
  3. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    According to another thread, every match these gents miss counts as a loss by pin against them.
  4. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Also Dean's dreaded "reverse cutback." Some are calling him 'dirty' for his 'attempt to injure Amos' knee' In regular speed, it looked like a mistake and a coincidence. Does not look great in slow motion!
  5. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Brooks got pinned? Yianni pinned multiple times. Crazy year!
  6. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Phelps swam a lot. A real lot. But spending large amounts of time in the water also has thermogenic effects that go beyond just the (considerable) exercise of elite swimmers. I heard a study quoted on a podcast. It was either Attia or Huberman. Can't remember.
  7. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
  8. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
  9. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Not as bad as what Brands did to Jeff Prescott!
  10. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    I believe that Dake has said that someone in media proposed that he should go up another weight and try to take out Taylor, and that is what solidified his choice to move up. Supposedly it was specifically for that reason.
  11. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    That is not the Zain plan. Next!
  12. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    It is the 1960s training techniques
  13. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    That is a pleasant thought. Lovely.
  14. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Exactly. The Anthony Cassar plan!
  15. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
  16. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Blast from the past!
  17. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Apparently he can't make 125 safely/effectively on a regular basis, so they are limiting his weigh-ins. If he has been having documented troubles making the weight for years, how is he still able to get certified there? It seems as if he is actually a 133.
  18. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    People are forgetting how close we were to losing the sport, and the adults (who should be smarter) seem to be blinded by their own ambition.
  19. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Not necessarily accurate. The committee has already shown a bias toward Lee in 2021. Plus he has 100% bonus and just absolutely demolished a guy who would be ranked top 10 at the moment.
  20. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
  21. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Askren v. Kish If you want to take it out of dual meets: Schultz v. Banach; Dake vs. Taylor.
  22. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Also, the best way to protect his safety is for him to go 133. That is the purpose of the rules. If 125 isn't safe to make all of the time, it is not the weight class for young Patrick. This is where the adults need to step in and do the right thing.
  23. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    If safety is an issue, he shouldn't be going down to 125. At all. That is the point of the rules. He should be 133. You bare either a 125, or you are not. There are ways to manipulate certification that are not "breaking rules' but do enable guys to certify at lower weights than they should. Every program does it, but it seems to be happening with some more than others, or to a greater degree. It is not 1997 anymore.
  24. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    Yep. Some many grey areas. I know some states require you to take the mat for the weigh-in to count at the high school level. Wrestlers are very good at finding ways around rules!
  25. Interviewed_at_Weehawken
    ... and isn't this the guy who flew out to Iowa when he knew Lee was not wrestling, missed weight, and then claimed Spencer was ducking him and he had no interest in wrestling a backup?
×
×
  • Create New...