Jump to content

Interviewed_at_Weehawken

Members
  • Posts

    5,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Interviewed_at_Weehawken

  1. I think we are also missing at least one "get back" coach.
  2. I was also referring to the 8-8 criteria win over Zepeda that I referenced earlier. Admittedly, the OP backed off a little, but that's where the "win is a win" sentiment was initially expressed. I had made the point that it might be a little early to talk about Stanich being a contender when he is squeaking out a win over a high school wrestler who may not be a starter at NC State this year (but I'm really hoping pans out over the long run).
  3. Yes, but apparently a super close match is just as convincing as a tech fall!
  4. Indeed. But, personally, I would have said one year if that was what I meant.
  5. I am not super surprised with Cenzo's movement, but I can't think of any other recent big names that moved around so much so quickly. I knew it was a thing in football. Just look up any number of NFL or D1 head coaches and watch how they went from a position coach at a D3 all the way up the ladder through the years.
  6. He's also been RTC coach, I think.
  7. I think it was Koll for a year or two at Stanford, but 2021 would have been the only year that covid altered anything.
  8. Graduated 2020. Has it been Stanford, Arizona State, UNC, and now Lehigh in six years?
  9. You're the only one beating anything in here
  10. Great hire, but seems to be a bit of a vagabond. I understand that is part of coaching, but he hasn't stayed long in any place.
  11. Hmmm. Sounds like DH may be a conspiracy theorist?
  12. Giving up 8 points in one match to someone who isn't a world beater (yet) would be more of a concern.
  13. Also Stanich had an 8-8 criteria win over Zepeda during this recent run. While Zepeda may end up being outstanding, he is probably not ready to challenge Henson or Mendez, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a redshirt.
  14. Aren't you the guy that said ICE wasn't LEO, and then had a post about them being LEO?
  15. Exactly. Never convicted of rape. It literally never happened.
  16. Didn't you just say they were not LEO? Then you post something demonstrating your ignorance? Talk about "hella-scary" LEO often arrests people based upon training and experience btw.
  17. I'm pretty sure he isn't a convicted rapist.
  18. Like I said before: Not many living people, outside of gymnasts, displayed the balance and body control that he did.
  19. @Tripnsweep It might be horrible speech, but we all enjoy our deserve to be able to express ourselves. It is a natural right. You would choose to deprive themselves of the right to express themselves because you don't like them or their message. That is dangerous.
  20. Your constant complaints about "WHATABOUTISM" just demonstrates hypocrisy because you literally change your stance from day to day based on tribalism. You literally have proven you can't be consistent from day to day r thread to thread, and if someone tries to hold you to your own standard, you cry "Whataboutism."
  21. NO... you literally were talking about protecting free speech yesterday, but today you say that the greatest president of your lifetime doesn't deserve to express himself. Be consistent, son!
×
×
  • Create New...