Kerk wrestled a safe gameplan to win against a guy who is fast, explosive, and strong. He coasted. No problem with that, but he wins the match the way it was wrestled 10/10 times.
Bartlett just won by more than one takedown against a guy who has three other losses on the season by one takedown (or less). That is like MM winning via techfellery. He didn't look bad. I am not sure why thinking he should have a wide margin on an AA quality wrestler is a requirement for him to do well. He won that match pretty easily.
LL looked like the cut might be a thing. He is at 133 for them next year. Davis at 141.
Barr with a 1M19S techfall against Poz? HFS. To put that in to perspective, here are his other losses via bonus:
2023-24 season-
- 3/21/24, NCAAs via 14-4 MAJ to Tanner Sloan
2022-23 season-
- NONE
2021-22 season-
- 1/16/22, Penn State dual via 10-2 MAJ to Aaron Brooks (184)
2020-21 season-
- 3/6/21, B1Gs via 10-2 MAJ to Aaron Brooks (184)
B1G champ vs B1G champ? Davis wins? Not impressive, but he got the dub against another high profile guy. VanDee might just wrestle Michigan guys tough. That could be a thing.
Kasak 4-0 over Harer? That one was perplexing and concerning. This is the same guy that a HEW-Ed Scott techfalled rather easily.
Turley putting up a fight against Haines wasn't a surprise. I think Haines gets bonus next time, if they meet again. While it was close, it really wasn't. Haines was never in danger.
Starocci with the techfellery on SCW? Is it insane to think that a 4x champ has nearly doubled his bonus rate from last year as of now? 52% VS 100%...