1032004

Based on the fact that “package volume” was separated out from “mail volume” in the link you shared… I’m not arguing that they’re “efficient,” I’d be on board with reducing the number of mail delivery days (just keep in mind this likely would impact Amazon packages as well). I’m more putting the % change numbers into context and pointing out that the actual employees have more work to do than prior years due to more houses to go to and more packages. Delivering a few less letters per house doesn’t impact their workload. As @fishbane noted, much of the “data” you cited is incorrect. C’mon Willie, you should know better than to just believe anonymous Twitter users and random AI summaries.

Interesting that Ramos stays above Lilledahl in coaches rank, but Hardy passes Bartlett. Hardy also now ahead of Bartlett in RPI. https://theguillotine.com/2025/03/ncaa-releases-final-coaches-rankings-and-final-rpi-rankings/

Yes that stood out to me as well.

I laughed at “everything’s computer!”

Well there’s only 7 teams and 6 of them are pretty good

He was definitely blowing the smoke off. Also not getting taken down here was impressive

I saw people saying they thought he was hoping Rutgers would injury default instead of taking the DQ, but not sure why they would. I understand people doing that when their guy is losing, but this was a 0-0 match and Cartagena-Walsh had already beaten Rogotzke in the dual. And the slam was pretty bad

I guess Flo rankers agree with you, they kept Bartlett one and put Hardy two. I’m also I’m surprised they kept Happel at 5

This. These guys are worse trolls than Cinnabon

So “all else” other than H2H and conference finish? I’m not sure how equal that is though. The only other criteria Bartlett will have for sure is winning % (10%). I think Hardy will have coaches rank (10%). He should also have common opponents (10%). Not sure on RPI. So still comes down to quality wins IMO, not sure the exact formula but I think Hardy has the edge due to his tougher schedule

Isn’t “all things” including the H2H though? Based on the seeding formula, H2H is canceled out by Conf placement + CR which I think Hardy will have. Bartlett will have winning %. Hardy may have RPI as he was only one spot behind Bartlett in the last RPI. So could come down to quality wins, not sure how they stack up but that’s an area where going to CKLV helps

Not following your logic here. You’re afraid of guys skipping early season tournaments, yet are advocating against the guy that took a loss at an early season tournament, and advocating for the guy that barely wrestled the 15 match minimum. Rewarding Hardy despite having the loss at CKLV should only encourage coaches to wrestle there. I agree with @BruceyB

Yeah I would have liked to see finals with commentary plus multiview of 3rd/5th on same screen

Agree finals should be separated from the 3rd/5th matches. It also detracted from those matches too. I like the multiview in the earlier rounds but that was not an option for finals

I’d take peak Gable over peak Snyder at 285. I’d also take peak Parris over peak Gwiz, and peak Kerk over peak Coon. But @PortaJohn has a fair point, 2022 wasn’t peak Parris or Kerk

Strickenberger only has 2 losses at 125, he could be 2 or 3. I assume Lilledahl will be #1. He’ll probably be ranked #1 after beating the previous #1.

Disagree. Love Rock

We should hire the SHALLENGE…LOST! guy too

Pretty sure it was, in Orine/McGonagle they confirmed it is not the mat refs reviewing the challenges. Looked like it may have been Gary Kessell. But yeah, don’t think I’ve ever seen that before - call is made, officials overturn it on their own then challenged and reversed back to original call…

Agree. Is this same as B10 where when they review it on their own it’s the mat refs and when they actually challenge it’s a third party?

Started at 157, Hipolito over Scott

“Haines was a 157 last year and Pinto was a 184 so that means Pinto will win”

Hopefully for PSU he breaks the Suriano curse