1032004
-
Posts
7,692 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Teams
College Commitments
Rankings
Authors
Jobs
Store
Everything posted by 1032004
-
Don't remember if anything in 2nd period or if timeclock issues. It was Woods/Echemendia where they stopped it with 1 second though if that's what you're thinking of
-
The officials reviewed that call though
-
Agree overall, but what did Dresser mess up at 157?
-
Yes, but the way Feldkamp wrestled last night, not sure he beats Glazier.
-
What were the refs looking in the rulebook about towards the end?
-
Yeah it seems the main “outcoaching” Brands did was using Kennedy and Arnold at 174/184. But they’re likely their best 2 guys there, so it’s not like it was rocket science to do that. I think people just weren’t totally sure if Kennedy was available. And if Swafford wasn’t, that likely made the decision even easier. That said, Dresser really didn’t do anything that would show him as outcoaching Brands…
-
Sure, could be 30 years, could be 1.
-
Yes, “in theory” is of course just a guess and a lot can change by next year. I don’t like either of them either. Just saying I don’t think next year’s teams will be all that different especially when you consider tonight’s results. Anthony likely isn’t beating Swiderski or Paniro if he’s not in jail, and Iowa won 184 (Angelo) and 197 (AJ) tonight. Like I said, could come down to Kueter vs Bastida. Or not, no one knows.
-
Here is the Chittum replay
-
Lol you seem triggered. Long time until next year, maybe Iowa gets some more portal guys
-
Check the video a couple posts up. I agree with no TD, but it’s awfully close
-
As he pointed out though, they restarted and wrestled 1 second… I was more commenting on prior to that.
-
@jross I actually just watched this like 20x and I actually could see this being called either way. It does seem like there is an ever so slight pause while Woods has his knee down, that you could probably argue was “reaction time.” Reaction time really needs to be defined…
-
Oh shoot I think you’re right, forgot about that. That part of the rule seems contradictory
-
Why not just enter unattached though?
-
Not sure who else Iowa will have at 157 or 141 next year, but off the top of my head ISU probably becomes the favorites at those weights with Iowa becoming the favorite at 165, which would give them the dual if in theory the rest of the matches have the same outcome as tonight.
-
Also, what would be the advantage of wrestling attached at the Soldier Salute?
-
FWIW, Minnow claims that Swafford was suspended for gambling at least for tonight, possibly the season…
-
Next year should still be close no? Of tonight’s winners, ISU loses only Carr, while Iowa loses Woods and Franek. Could come down to Bastida vs Kueter
-
Yeah I think this is what’s been happening in practice, and yes for that reason I think fewer matches will go into overtime.
-
I’m not a fan of either team so no I probably wouldn’t have “cared,” but I would have thought it was the wrong call. Chittum was closer to a takedown than Woods IMO, and seems like the refs agreed.
-
Ha. Very true. Can probably add 125
-
Actually Brain seems upset about this one, and did point out that they did actually wrestle the last second…
-
Maybe. And I was surprised he didn’t challenge and probably would have if I was him. Just don’t think it “lost them the dual”
