Jump to content

mspart

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,978

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mspart

  1. mspart
    I see what you mean. But in this case, it seems apparent that most of the bureaucracy is against Trump so I don't think there would be any issue with them calling this out as currently constituted. That may change. I'm sure someone from across the aisle can call out waste that these guys miss. Like that would happen. mspart
  2. mspart
    I think in this case it is not the government a group of outsiders looking inside for waste and identifying it. They seem to be on this train for some time and want to do it. They do not constitute another agency really. They can do nothing by themselves. I think that is the reason. mspart
  3. mspart
    Release the report. Gaetz needs to go through the same hellish nightmare confirmation hearing as all the rest will. If he did nothing wrong, that should be in the report. mspart
  4. mspart
    So to understand correctly, Vak has no objection to a DOGE type group trying to root out wasteful and inefficient spending. Vak just doesn't want Musk or Vivek at the head. Is that correct? mspart
  5. mspart
    I would be happy to have the folks that ordered this to lose their jobs. If that action is a felony, then yes, jail or prison. But at least fire those that ordered this. mspart
  6. mspart
    Congress has to approve anything they identify. They will not control government spending. They will identify inefficiencies and waste. It will be up to Congress to act on the information. mspart
  7. mspart
    There you go again personally attacking. I'm sorry you don't see it as a character flaw but it is. It doesn't assist you in your attempt to communicate. What comes across is rage, not information. mspart
  8. mspart
    Illuminate please. What did she quite said? mspart
  9. mspart
    Perhaps, they will include him if he is that good. I just don't see where cutting wasteful spending is a bad thing, no matter who does it. You are more interested in the who, I am more interested in the get 'er done. mspart
  10. mspart
    Exactly Vak. That role does not exist in government. So why do you keep saying it does when you just said it doesn't? If Musk and Vivek can be successful, then why not give them a shot. If not, then they got their shot no harm done. Again, any changes will have to get through congress. mspart
  11. mspart
    Exactly the point Vak. How have they failed? Spending is not reduced. mspart
  12. mspart
    Trump and Biden conversing civilly. A rare moment. Biden looked more relaxed than at anytime in the last 6 months. mspart
  13. mspart
    That's 48484747477484858559 times if you are seriously counting. mspart
  14. mspart
    Gaetz was a rabble rouser. He will shake up DOJ which needs it badly. But I don't think he will be judicious about it, I seen him taking a chain saw to it. I would like someone who is a bit more careful about this trimming operation. But as we can see Garland isn't the man for the job. mspart
  15. mspart
    He can't increase space x funding etc. He can only find them not inefficient and leave them alone. Congress has the purse strings. You guys are all Chicken Littles running around saying the sky is falling or gonna fall if Musk is able to identify wasteful and inefficient spending but saves his own funding. I'd say that not a bad bargain. The money will be spent if he does nothing. The money might be saved if he does something. Objectively, which is better? mspart
  16. mspart
    Just wondering. Did she get disappeared or what? mspart
  17. mspart
    Yep, this will be investigated I'm sure and there will be firings as there well should be. mspart
  18. mspart
    Why him? What does he have to offer? mspart
  19. mspart
    Yeah, I'm not for this one. Just saw it on The Hill. mspart
  20. mspart
    So how has the office that already exists been doing? Apparently not very well as we are trillions in debt. Maybe a new approach is needed as they seem ineffective. See what I did there? Called them ineffective while Musk is looking for inefficiencies? Your newly found awesome department might be at the top of the list. mspart
  21. mspart
    So doing nothing is preferable to doing something? I think your issue is with Trump and who he chooses, not with the effort itself. But if it is with the effort itself, it wouldn't matter who is doing this as far as you are concerned. mspart
  22. mspart
    That doesn't answer the question. Is cutting no fat better than cutting fat? mspart
  23. mspart
    So what if they identify and eliminate all the waste except for space x and tesla stuff. Is that still bad? mspart
  24. mspart
    Agreed. mspart
  25. mspart
    He loves mexican food!! mspart
×
×
  • Create New...